Volume 23, Issue 2 pp. 150-156

Hansen's disease in a general hospital: uncommon presentations and delay in diagnosis

JA Da Costa Nery

JA Da Costa Nery

Department of Dermatology, University Gama Filho, Brazil,

Search for more papers by this author
PAM Schreuder

PAM Schreuder

NLR, Brazil,

Search for more papers by this author
P Castro Teixeira de Mattos

P Castro Teixeira de Mattos

Department of Medicine, University Gama Filho, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
L Vieira de Mendonça

L Vieira de Mendonça

Department of Medicine, University Gama Filho, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
R Tebaldi Tardi

R Tebaldi Tardi

HD Control,

Search for more papers by this author
S De Mello

S De Mello

Department of Dermatology, Santa Casa,

Search for more papers by this author
RD Azulay

RD Azulay

Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
LF Lehman

LF Lehman

ALM Brasil, Prevention of Impairment and Disability,

Search for more papers by this author
B Naafs

Corresponding Author

B Naafs

Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

*Correspondence: B Naafs. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 January 2009
Citations: 18

Abstract

Background The question was raised as to why ‘obvious’ signs of leprosy, Hansen's disease (HD), are often missed by medical doctors working in a HD endemic area.

Methods This study describes a small sample of patients who were diagnosed with HD during their hospital admission and not before. The discussion is whether the typical early signs and symptoms of HD are just not recognized, or whether unusual presentations confuse the attending physician.

Results A total of 23 HD patients were hospitalized during the study period, of which 6 (26%) were only diagnosed with HD during their admission. All were classified as lepromatous leprosy (LL) with a history of signs and symptoms of HD. In nearly all patients, a suspicion of HD might have been raised earlier if a careful history and dermato-neurological examination had been done.

Conclusions Multibacillary (MB) HD, especially close to the lepromatous end of the spectrum, may mimic other diseases, and the patient can not be diagnosed without a biopsy or a slit skin smear examination. Clinicians working in a HD endemic area (Rio de Janeiro) do not always include HD in their differential diagnosis, especially when the clinical presentation is unusual. HD should be considered in all patients with skin lesions not responding to treatment, especially when they have neurological deficits, and live or have lived in an HD endemic area. Due to the increase in global travel and immigration, doctors in low endemic areas need to consider HD as a possible diagnosis.

Conflicts of interest

None declared

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.