Volume 18, Issue 5 pp. 266-272

Nonpharmacological treatment for migraine: incremental utility of physical therapy with relaxation and thermal biofeedback

DA Marcus

Corresponding Author

DA Marcus

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pain Evaluation and Treatment Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;

DA Marcus, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center1, Pain Evaluation and Treatment Institute, 4601 Baum Blvd, Pittsburgh PA15213, USA. Search for more papers by this author
L Scharff

L Scharff

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pain Evaluation and Treatment Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;

Search for more papers by this author
S Mercer

S Mercer

School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand;

Search for more papers by this author
DC Turk

DC Turk

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 July 2008
Citations: 4

Abstract

The identification of musculoskeletal abnormalities in headache patients has led to the incorporation of physical therapy (PT) into treatment programs for chronic headache. The current studies: (i) investigated the efficacy of PT as a treatment for migraine, and (ii) investigated the utility of PT as an adjunct treatment in patients who fail to improve with relaxation training/thermal biofeedback (RTB). PT alone is not effective in reducing headache, with only 14% of subjects reporting significant headache reduction (mean reduction of 15.6% in comparison with 41.3% in RTB). However, PT may have been a useful adjunct, with 47% of a group of 11 subjects who had failed to improve with RTB reporting improvement with the addition of PT. It is recommended that RTB remain the nonmedical treatment of choice for migraine, and that PT may be a useful adjunct for patients who fail to improve after such treatment

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.