All Things Considered: Systematic Cognitive Processing and Electoral Decision-making
Abstract
This paper seeks to understand what difference it makes if voters systematically consider a representative range of salient criteria before choosing a candidate, and whether the effects of such systematic processing are conditioned by political knowledge. To this end, we executed experiments during the 2000 electoral season that randomly exposed some subjects to an Analytic Hierarchy Processing (AHP) tool, which encourages systematic processing of various orthogonal decision criteria in complex choice environments. We predicted, and found, that the choices of knowledgeable voters exposed to AHP were weaker and less consistent than control group responses, suggesting that systematic processing induces integrative complexity and perhaps “analysis paralysis” among knowledgeable voters. However, we found that among less knowledgeable voters, the opposite pattern generally emerged—AHP exposure was associated with even greater reliance on party ID and ideology cues, perhaps even bolstering predispositions via projection and rationalization.
References
- Aldrich, John, John Sullivan, and E. Borgida. 1989.“Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz before a Blind Audience’?”American Political Science Review 83(1): 123–42.
- Alvarez, R. M., and J. Brehm. 1995.“American Ambivalence Toward Abortion Policy: A Heteroskedastic Probit Method for Assessing Values. American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 1055–82.
- Aronson, Ronald. 1980. Jean-Paul Sartre—Philosophy of the World. London Verso Press.
- Bargh, J. A. 1994. “The Four Horsemen of Automaticity: Awareness, Intention, Efficiency, and Control in Social Cognition.” In Handbook of Social Cognition, eds. R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum. , pp. 1–40.
-
Barker, David C.
2002. Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior. New York
Columbia University Press.
10.7312/bark11806 Google Scholar
- Bartels, Larry. 1996.“Uninformed Voters. Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194–231.
- Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980.“The Two Faces of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 74(1): 8–91.
- Chaiken, Shelly. 1980.“Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing in the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 1752–66.
- Chaiken, Shelly, A. Liberman, and Alice Eagly. 1989. “Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing Within and Beyond the Persuasion Context.” In Unintended Thought, eds. J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh. New York Guilford Press. , pp. 212–52.
- Chaiken, Shelly and Yaacov Trope, eds. 1999. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York The Guilford Press.
- Chen, Serena and Shelly Chaiken. 1999. “The Heuristic-Systematic Model in Its Broader Context.” In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, eds. Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope. New York The Guilford Press.
- Cobb, Michael D., and James H. Kuklinski. 1997.“Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 88–121.
- Combs, James E., and Dan Nimmo. 1993. The New Propaganda: The Dictatorship of Palaver in Contemporary Politics. New York Longman.
- Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David Apter. New York Free Press Guilford Press, pp. 202–61.
- Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven Yale University Press.
- Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven Yale University Press.
- Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York Harper and Row.
- Eagly. Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL Harcourt College Publishers.
- Feldman, Stanley and John Zaller. 1992.“The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State. American Journal of Political Science 36(2): 268–307.
- Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven Yale University Press.
- Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven Yale University Press.
- Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill.
- Forman, Ernest and Mary Ann Selly. 1998. Decision by Objectives (How to Convince Others that You are Right). http://www.ExpertChoice.com. Accessed September, 7, 2004.
- Franklin, Benjamin. 1956[1772]. “A Letter to Joseph Priestly.” Reprinted in The Benjamin Franklin Sampler. New York Fawcett, 1956.
- Funk, Carolyn. 1999.“Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation. Journal of Politics 61(3): 700–20.
- Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., and D. Eisenstadt. 1991.“Cross-racial Appraisal as Related to Attitude Ambivalence and Cognitive Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(1): 83–92.
- Hurwitz, John and Mark Peffley. 1987.“The Means and Ends of Foreign Policy as Determinants of Presidential Support. American Journal of Political Science 31(2): 236–58.
- Iyengar, Shanto and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
- Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice and Public Policy. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
- Judd, C. M., and C. M. Lusk. 1984.“Knowledge Structures and Evaluative Judgments: Effects of Structural Variables on Judgment Extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 1193–1207.
-
Kelley, Stanley, Jr.1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton
Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400855650 Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R., and L. M. Sanders. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
- Lau, Richard and David Sears 1986. Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997.“Voting Correctly. American Political Science Review 91(3): 585–99.
- Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001.“Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 951–71.
- Lavine, Howard. 2001.“The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence toward Presidential Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 915–29.
- Liberman, Akiva and Shelly Chaiken. 1991.“Value Conflict and Thought-Induced Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27(3): 203–16.
- Linville, Patricia W. 1982.“The Complexity-Extremity Effect and Age-based Stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(4): 689–703.
- Lodge, Milton, Kathleen McGraw, and Patrick Stroh. 1989.“An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review 83(2): 399–420.
- Lupia, Arthur. 1994.“Shortcuts vs. Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88(1): 63–76.
-
Luskin, Robert C.
2002. “Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste.” In Thinking About Political Psychology, ed. James H. Kuklinski. Cambridge
Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–252.
10.1017/CBO9780511510632.008 Google Scholar
-
McClosky, Herbert and
John Zaller.
1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge
Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674428522 Google Scholar
- McKelvey, Richard D., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1986.“Information, Electoral Equilibrium, and the Democratic Ideal. Journal of Politics 31(1): 169–93.
- Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2000.“News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 301–15.
- National Election Studies. 2000. The 2000 National Election Study [data set]. http://www.umich.edu/~nes.
- Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997.“Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91(3): 567–84.
- Nie, Norman H., and K. Anderson. 1974.“Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure. Journal of Politics 36(3): 540–91.
- Nie, Norman H., S. Verba, and J. R. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge Harvard University Press.
- Nisbett, R. E., and L. Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
- Palmer, Brian. 1999. “Click Here for Decisions. Fortune (May 10): 153–56.
- Peffley, Mark A., and Jon Hurwitz. 1985.“A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint. American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 871–90.
- Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1981. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque Wm. C. Brown.
-
Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo.
1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York
Springer-Verlag.
10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 Google Scholar
-
Popkin, S. L.
1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago
University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Rahn, Wendy M. 1995. “Candidate Evaluation in Complex Information Environments: Cognitive Organization and Comparison Processes.” In Political Judgment, eds. Milton Lodge and Kathleen McGraw. Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press, pp. 43–64.
- Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven Yale University Press.
- Saaty, Thomas L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York McGraw-Hill.
- Sears, David O. 1986.“College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(3): 515–30.
-
Simon, Herbert.
1960. The New Science of Management Decision. New York
Harper and Brothers.
10.1037/13978-000 Google Scholar
- Smith, Eric R. A. N. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley and Los Angeles University of California Press.
- Sullivan, J. L., J. E. Piereson, and G. E. Marcus. 1982. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
- Sullivan, Rosemary. 1975. Theodore Roethke: The Garden Master. Seattle University of Washington Press.
- Tesser, Abe and M. C. Conlee. 1975.“Some Effects of Time and Thought on Attitude Polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13(2): 262–70.
- Tesser, Abe and C. Leone. 1977.“Cognitive Schemas and Thought as Determinants of Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(4): 340–56.
- Tetlock, Philip E. 1986.“A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 819–27.
- Tetlock, Philip E. 1993. “Cognitive Structural Analysis of Political Rhetoric: Methodological and Theoretical Issues.” In Explorations in Political Psychology, eds. S. Iyengar and W. McGuire. Durham Duke University Press.
- Thompson, Megan M., Mark P. Zanna, and Dale W. Griffin. 1995. “Let's Not be Indifferent about (Attitudinal) Ambivalence.” In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, eds. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum, pp. 361–86.
- Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974.“Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185 1124–31.
- Verba, Sidney and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York Harper and Row.
- Verba, Sidney and G. R. Orren. 1985. Equality in America: The View From the Top. Cambridge Harvard University Press.
-
Verba, Sidney,
Kay Lehman Schlozman and
Henry E. Brady.
1995. Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge
Harvard University Press.
10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 Google Scholar
- Wilson, Timothy, Dana S. Dunn, Dolores Kraft, and D. Lisle. 1989. “The Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why We Feel the Way We Do.” In Advances in Social Psychology, ed. Leonard Berkowitz. Orlando Academic Press, pp. 287–343.
- Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New York Yale University Press.
- Woodward, Bob. 1994. The Agenda: Inside the Clinton White House. New York Simon and Schuster.
- Zahedi, F. 1986.“The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces 16(1): 96–108.
-
Zaller, John.
1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge
Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511818691 Google Scholar
- Zaller, John and Stanley Feldman. 1992.“A Simple Theory of Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.