Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neurological complications of HIV infection
Abstract
The spectrum of neurological complications of HIV-infection has remained unchanged through the years, but its epidemiology changed remarkably as a result of the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, CMV encephalitis, CMV polyradiculomyelitis, tuberculous meningitis, primary CNS lymphoma, HIV dementia, HIV myelopathy and HIV polyneuropathy are given with a grading of evidence and recommendations.
Background and objectives
The introduction and widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of HIV infection has resulted in dramatic reductions in morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilization (Kovacs et al., 1996; Hogg et al., 1998; Palella et al., 1998). Decreasing rates for opportunistic infections, including the neurological infections, have been reported. Diagnostic tools for these neurological complications have been greatly improved in the past 5–10 years. The therapeutic approach to the neurologic diseases have been influenced by the success of HAART. Together these developments form the main reason for producing these new guidelines.
The objective of the study was to provide neurologists and others with evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological complications of HIV infection.
Neurological complications
These guidelines deal with the most common neurological complications of HIV-infection. Although the epidemiology of the neurological complications have changed considerably in recent years in the West, the spectrum has remained relatively unchanged. The most frequent opportunistic infections are cerebral toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), tuberculous meningitis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis and CMV polyradiculomyelitis. Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has become less frequent, but is still an important cause of focal brain disease. The neurological diseases that are more directly related to HIV itself are HIV dementia, vacuolar myelopathy and peripheral neuropathy. HIV dementia is rare in patients who take HAART, but with resistance and compliance problems patients may become at risk. Peripheral neuropathy is still a frequent complication, not only in severely immunosuppressed patients. The role of antiretroviral drugs in the pathogenesis remains uncertain.
HAART
An increasing number of potent antiretroviral drugs are available (Richman, 2001). When used in combinations of three or four drugs, this treatment is called HAART. In most HIV-infected patients, especially treatment-naive patients, HAART is effective in rapidly reducing plasma levels of HIV-RNA, accompanied by a gradual increase in CD4 cell counts, sometimes to normal levels (Richman, 2001; Yeni et al., 2002). For many antiretroviral-naive patients, CD4 cell counts increase to levels at which the patients are no longer generally susceptible to serious opportunistic infections. Because currently available antiretroviral regimens will not eradicate HIV, the goal of therapy is to durably inhibit viral replication so that the patient can attain and maintain an effective immune response to most potential microbial pathogens (De Luca et al., 2001; Yeni et al., 2002). The recently updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel advise the start of treatment in patients with symptomatic HIV disease and in patients with CD4 cell counts below 350 cells/μl or viral loads above 50 000–100 000 copies/ml (Yeni et al., 2002). The most commonly used regimens to start with contain two nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors with either a non-nucleoside RT inhibitor or a single (or boosted) protease inhibitor. Antiretroviral activity is evaluated by assessing changes in CD4 cell count and viral load in the plasma. Availability of new drugs has widened the options for patients who fail to respond to their antiretroviral regimen. A patient with one of the neurological complications described below has symptomatic HIV disease and HAART is indicated but the strength of the evidence for this recommendation varies from complication to complication.
The immune restoration itself, i.e. the result of HAART, may have a beneficial effect on the neurological complication. For some of the neurological diseases (PML, HIV dementia) this has been documented in small uncontrolled studies. Besides HAART, disease-specific therapy for the neurological complications is indicated, as discussed below. The duration of these specific treatments is determined by the level of immunosuppression. Before HAART became available, the treatment for the acute infection had to be followed by lifelong secondary prophylaxis to prevent relapses (e.g. for toxoplasmosis, cryptococcosis). The recommendation in general now with HAART is, that secondary prophylaxis can be discontinued if CD4 cell counts show a significant and sustained increase in both absolute and percentage terms, e.g. if they have increased to above 200 cells/μl and have remained at that level for at least 3 months. Primary prophylaxis for neurological complications is not recommended.
Search strategy
A MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine) search of the relevant literature from 1966 to August 2002 was undertaken using various combinations of the following MeSH headings: HIV-1, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HIV-infections, Toxoplasmosis cerebral, Meningitis cryptococcal, Leukoencephalopathy Progressive multifocal, Polyneuropathies, Polyradiculopathy, Encephalitis, myelitis transverse, Lymphoma, central nervous system, cytomegalovirus infection, tuberculosis central nervous system, diagnosis, therapeutics, drug therapy. The following free text words were used: highly active antiretroviral therapy, cerebral toxoplasmosis, PML, CMV encephalitis, CMV polyradiculomyelitis, primary CNS lymphoma, HIV dementia, AIDS dementia, vacuolar myelopathy, HIV myelopathy and sensory neuropathy. Limitations included meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial, sensitivity and specificity, cohort studies, case–control studies.
Grading of recommendations
All members of the task force prepared one or more of the ten selected neurological complications. The material available from the literature review was integrated and summarized in graded recommendations (Table 1). The recommendations were approved by all members.
Classification of evidence levels for diagnostic tests |
I: Evidence provided by a prospective study in a broad spectrum of persons with the suspected condition, using a ‘gold-standard’ for case definition, where the test is applied in a blinded evaluation, enabling the assessment of appropriate tests of diagnostic accuracy |
II. Evidence provided by a prospective study of a narrow spectrum of persons with the suspected condition, or a well-designed retrospective study of a broad spectrum of persons with an established condition (by ‘gold standard’) compared with a broad spectrum of controls, where test is applied in a blinded evaluation, and enabling the assessment of appropriate tests of diagnostic accuracy |
III: Evidence provided by a retrospective study where either persons with the established condition or controls are of a narrow spectrum, and where test is applied in a blinded evaluation |
IV: Any design where test is not applied in blinded evaluation or evidence provided by expert opinion alone or in descriptive case series (without controls) |
Classification of evidence levels for healthcare interventions |
Ia: Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
Ib: Evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled trial |
IIa: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomization |
IIb: Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well- designed quasi-experimental study |
III: Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case studies |
IV: Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities |
Classification of grades of recommendation |
A: Requires at least one randomized controlled trial as part of a body of literature of overall good quality and consistency addressing specific recommendation (evidence levels Ia, Ib) |
B: Requires the availability of well-conducted clinical studies but not randomized clinical trials on the topic of recommendation (evidence levels IIa, IIb, III) |
C: Requires evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities. Indicates an absence of directly applicable clinical studies of good quality (evidence level IV) |
Cerebral toxoplasmosis
Cerebral toxoplasmosis is a frequent cause of focal brain disease in HIV infection. Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite in human beings. Toxoplasmic encephalitis is almost always caused by reactivation of Toxoplasma gondii cysts in brain parenchyma.
Diagnosis
A presumptive diagnosis of cerebral toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients is based on: (1) progressive neurological deficits, (2) contrast-enhancing mass lesion(s) on imaging studies [computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI)], (3) succesful response within 2 weeks to specific treatment (see below) [class IV]. Absence of one or more of these characteristics makes cerebral toxoplasmosis less likely. Those patients are possible candidates for brain biopsy. In clinical practice most patients with mass lesion(s) are given two weeks of treatment anyway (including patients with negative serology or a single lesion). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies, including antibody studies and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies, have not produced conclusive results (Franzen et al., 1997).
Treatment
Primary therapy for cerebral toxoplasmosis (Leport et al., 1988; Danneman et al., 1992; Katlama et al., 1996a,b): pyrimethamine 200 mg load, then 50 mg/day (oral) with sulfadiazine 1 g four times daily (oral) (or clindamycin i.v. or oral 600 mg four times daily) with folinic acid 10 mg/day (oral) –[class IIa] Recommendation Grade B.
Other possible combinations:
- 1
Trimethroprim/sulfamethoxazol oral or i.v. 2.5–5 mg/kg (TMP) q.i.d. [IIa] (Torre et al., 1998).
- 2
Pyrimethamine (as above) plus clarithromycin 1 g twice daily [III].
- 3
Pyrimethamine (as above) plus azithromycin 600–1800 mg/day [III] (Jacobsen et al., 2001).
- 4
Pyrimethamine (as above) plus dapsone 100 mg/day [III].
- 5
Atovaquone 750 mg four times daily (oral) [IIa] (Torres et al., 1997).
For secondary prophylaxis (Leport et al., 1988; Katlama et al., 1996a): pyrimethamine 50 mg/day with sulfadiazine 500 mg four times daily.
[IIa] Recommendation Grade B. Alternatives are: atovaquone 750 mg four times daily (oral) [IIa] [(Katlama et al., 1996b) 13] or pyrimethamine 50 mg/day + sulfadiazine 500 mg four times daily, twice a week [IIa] (Podzamczer et al., 1995).
The primary therapy is usually continued for 6 weeks, followed by secondary prophylaxis. Secondary prophylaxis can be stopped according to the recommendations described above.
Cryptococcal meningitis
Infection with the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans in HIV-infected individuals most often leads to a subacute meningitis. The initial infection is a pulmonary infection. In the immunosuppressed host dissemination occurs afterwards to many organ systems, including the CNS.
Diagnosis
A definitive diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis is made by using any of the following methods:
- 1
Visualizing the fungus in the CSF using India ink (sensitivity 75–85%) [class I].
- 2
Detecting cryptococcal antigen by latex agglutination assay in the CSF (sensitivity 95%) [class I].
- 3
Positive CSF culture for C. neoformans[class I].
Treatment
It is important to be alert (especially in the first week after the diagnosis has been made) for high CSF pressures that may lead to blindness, coma, seizures etc. Removing 20–30 ml CSF by (repeated) spinal tap or (in severe cases) a lumbar drain for a few days may be necessary. Based on several randomized clinical trials (Larsen et al., 1990; De Gans et al., 1992; Saag et al., 1992; Van der Horst et al., 1997) the recommendation for treatment is: amphotericin B 0.7 mg/kg/day i.v. (with or without flucytosine 5-FC; 100 mg/kg/day orally) for 2 weeks [class Ia]. This treatment is followed by: fluconazole 400 mg/day (or itraconazole 400 mg/day) (orally) to complete a course of 10 weeks [class Ia] Recommendation Grade A. The addition of flucytosine to amphotericin B did not significantly improve the mortality and clinical course in a randomized clinical trial (RCT); however, flucytosine was well tolerated and there was a trend to a better CSF sterilization with its use in this study (Van der Horst et al., 1997). CSF examination should be repeated to confirm a therapeutic response (negative CSF culture).
For secondary prophylaxis fluconazole 200 mg /day (oral) [class Ia] Recommendation Grade A (Bozzette et al., 1991; Powderly et al., 1992; Saag et al., 1999). Secondary prophylaxis can be stopped according to the recommendations described above.
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a viral opportunistic infection of oligodendrocytes and astrocytes leading to demyelination in the CNS. The causative agent is a polyomavirus named JC virus. JC virus is ubiquitous in human beings and is usually acquired during adolescence (two-thirds have antibodies at age of 14 years).
Diagnosis
Slowly progressive focal neurological deficits with asymmetrical white matter abnormalities on MRI suggest PML. The lesions are non-enhancing, hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI, without mass effect. The subcortical ‘U’ fibres are characteristically involved. This diagnosis is strongly supported by positive CSF-PCR for JC virus DNA (sensitivity 72–100%; specificity 92–100%) [class I] (Cinque et al., 1997). If the CSF-PCR is negative, it is recommended to repeat CSF-PCR once or twice. Brain biopsy remains the final confirmatory test, but a positive CSF-PCR offers acceptable evidence.
Treatment
In patients who are being treated with HAART PML arrests or remits in approximately 50%, and survival is prolonged in these patients (Miralles et al., 1998; Clifford et al., 1999; De Luca et al., 2000a, 2001). The course is progressive in the other 50%.
It has been suggested by several reports that cidofovir (5 mg/kg i.v. once weekly) offers an additional benefit [class III] (De Luca et al., 2000b; Marra et al., 2002). Controlled clinical trials are lacking. Cidofovir should be considered as an experimental treatment.
CMV encephalitis
Cytomegalovirus belongs to the family of herpes viruses. CMV infection is endemic; the majority of HIV-infected adults have serologic evidence of prior CMV infection. Clinical syndromes in immunosuppressed patients include retinitis, gastrointestinal ulcers, encephalitis and polyradiculomyelitis.
Diagnosis
CMV encephalitis is suspected in an HIV-infected patient with (usually) a history of CMV disease (e.g. CMV retinitis), a clinically progressive encephalopathy and periventricular enhancement (ventriculitis) on imaging (CT/MRI) studies. The diagnosis is strongly supported by: (i) positive CSF-PCR for CMV-DNA (sensitivity 62–100%; specificity 89–100%) [class I] (Cinque et al., 1998) or (ii) positive CSF culture [class I] (Cinque et al., 1998), but in general CSF viral cultures are highly insensitive.
Brain biopsy is not a realistic option given the brainstem and periventricular localization of the encephalitis. CSF-PCR is the diagnostic test of choice.
Treatment
Induction treatment (for 3 weeks) (Anduze-Faris et al., 2000): ganciclovir 5 mg/kg i.v. twice daily [class IV] or foscarnet 90 mg/kg i.v. twice daily [class IV] or cidofovir 5 mg/kg i.v. every week; after two courses every 2 weeks [class IV] or ganciclovir and foscarnet (dosages as above) [class IV] Recommendation Grade C.
Maintenance treatment (Anduze-Faris et al., 2000): ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/day i.v. [class IV].
CMV polyradiculomyelitis
This is the most common polyradiculomyelitis in AIDS. The most frequent manifestations are pain (low-back, sciatic), paresthesia, sphincter dysfunction, distal sensory loss, and progressive ascending weakness.
Diagnosis
CMV polyradiculomyelitis is suspected in an HIV-infected patient with (usually) a history of CMV disease (e.g. CMV retinitis), clinically a rapidly ascending polyradiculomyelitis and a highly characteristic CSF polymorphonuclear pleocytosis. The diagnosis is strongly supported by: (i) positive CSF-PCR for CMV-DNA (sensitivity 62–100%; specificity 89–100%) [class I] (Cinque et al., 1998) or (ii) positive CSF culture [class I] (Cinque et al., 1998), but in general CSF viral cultures are highly insensitive.
Treatment
Induction treatment (for 3 weeks) (Anduze-Faris et al., 2000): ganciclovir 5 mg/kg i.v. b.i.d. [class IV] or foscarnet 90 mg/kg i.v. b.i.d. [class IV] or cidofovir 5 mg/kg i.v. every week; after two courses every 2 weeks [class IV] or ganciclovir and foscarnet (dosages as above) [class IV] Recommendation C.
Maintenance treatment (Anduze-Faris et al., 2000): ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/day i.v. [class IV].
Tuberculous meningitis
Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the leading cause of death worldwide among persons infected with HIV. Tuberculous meningitis and CNS tuberculomas are common complications. CNS tuberculosis in HIV disease is more frequent in developing countries.
Diagnosis
CNS tuberculosis has been described in 10–20% of patients with HIV-related tuberculosis. Lymphocytic pleocytosis, low glucose and raised protein are the typical features of tuberculous meningitis. Post-contrast brain scans show enhancement of the meninges and the periphery of the tuberculoma and on occasion, may reveal miliary lesions. Hydrocephalus may appear early.The diagnosis is based on demonstration of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the CSF (Zuger and Lowy, 1997; Gordin, 1999): (i) culture (sensitivity 25–86%) [class I] or (ii) CSF smear (ZN) (sensitivity 8–86%) [class IV] or (iii) CSF-PCR (sensitivity 83–100%; specificity 88–100%) [class II].
Treatment
Isoniazid 5 mg/kg/day, up to 300 mg/day and rifampicin 10 mg/kg/day up to 600 mg/day and pyrazinamide 15–30 mg/kg/day (max 2.5 g/day) and ethambutol 15–25 mg/kg/day up to 1600 mg/day [class III] Recommendation Grade A (Zuger and Lowy, 1997; Gordin, 1999).
Ethambutol can be substituted with streptomycin (15 mg/kg/day, up to 1 g/day i.m. or i.v.; max 2 months) or amikacin (15 mg/kg/day i.m. or i.v.). The role of steroids in HIV-positive tuberculous meningitis is unclear. The minimum duration of treatment is 6 months. Isoniazid may lead to pyridoxine deficiency and a sensorimotor distal polyneuropathy. Therefore pyridoxine 20 mg/day should be added to the regimen.
Primary CNS lymphoma
Primary CNS lymphoma is a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that arises within and is confined to the nervous system. It is the second most frequent CNS mass lesion in adults with AIDS in western countries. Primary CNS lymphoma is associated with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. The transforming potential of the virus plays a role in the pathogenesis of this tumour.
Epstein–Barr virus has the potential to transform B lymphocytes after infection. This transforming potential of EBV is involved in the development of primary CNS lymphoma and other tumours. Cytological examination of the CSF rarely reveals pathological cells and its value, although not well studied, seems limited. Data on other potential CSF markers of primary CNS lymphoma are inconclusive. Data on CD23 are promising and need further validation. These markers cannot be recommended as diagnostic tests in primary CNS lymphoma. Three small studies suggest that thallium-201 single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) is specific for primary CNS lymphoma. Two positron emission tomography (PET) studies show comparable results (O'Malley et al., 1994; Ruiz et al., 1994; Berry et al., 1995; Cingolani et al., 1998; Lorberboym et al., 1998; Antinori et al., 1999; Licho et al., 2002). In conclusion, SPECT/PET study results are inconclusive, and these investigations cannot be recommended.
Diagnosis
A definitive diagnosis is made by histological examination of brain tissue (obtained by brain biopsy or at autopsy). In an HIV-infected individual with a single or multiple contrast-enhancing brain lesion(s) on CT or MRI not responding to anti-toxoplasmic therapy, a presumptive diagnosis can be supported by: positive CSF EBV-PCR (sensitivity 83–100%, specificity 93–100%) [class II] (Cinque et al., 1993, 1996; Arribas et al., 1995; De Luca et al., 1995).
Treatment
HAART improves neurological status and prolongs survival in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (Hoffman et al., 2001). Besides HAART three other treatment options exist: (i) whole-brain irradiation and corticosteroids [class III] (Baumgartner et al., 1990; Goldstein et al., 1991; Donahue et al., 1995), (ii) intravenous methotrexate followed by whole brain radiation [class III] (Jacomet et al., 1997) or (iii) methotrexate, thiotepa, and procarbazine intravenously in combination with methotrexate intrathecally [class III] (Forsyth et al., 1994) –Recommendation Grade B.
HIV dementia
HIV dementia is a syndrome of cognitive and motor dysfunction that has also been termed: AIDS dementia complex, HIV-associated cognitive-motor complex and AIDS dementia. Its paediatric counterpart is called progressive encephalopathy. The cognitive impairment is compatible with a subcortical dementia. Most patients with HIV dementia are severely immunosuppressed.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis is based on (Price, 1996; McArthur and Selnes, 1997a): (i) progressive cognitive impairment (with or without motor dysfunction), (ii) exclusion of CNS opportunistic infections and tumors (by CSF and CT/MRI) and is supported by: (1) high levels of HIV RNA in the CSF (above 3 log copies/ml) [class III] (Brew et al., 1997; Ellis et al., 1997; McArthur et al., 1997b) and (2) diffuse, bilateral (often symmetrical) non-enhancing white-matter hyperintensities on MRI [class III] (Levy et al., 1986).
Treatment
HAART [class III] Recommendation Grade B (Foudraine et al., 1998; Sacktor et al., 2002). Most nucleosides and non-nucleosides (e.g. nevirapine) penetrate relatively well into the CSF; most protease inhibitors do not (with the exception of indinavir). It seems reasonable to include at least two drugs in the regimen that penetrate well (Enting et al., 1998). The data are limited. Most combinations have not been well studied in HIV dementia.
HIV myelopathy
Spinal cord disease is observed in various stages of HIV infection.The most common type is HIV myelopathy (also named HIV-related vacuolar myelopathy). HIV myelopathy is a progressive non-segmental spinal cord disease. The diagnosis is one of exclusion.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis is based on (Di Rocco 1999; Thurnher et al., 2000): (i) progressive myelopathy without sensory level, (ii) absence of focal lesion or mass lesion in spinal cord or compression of spinal cord on MRI and (iii) negative human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I) serology, (iv) normal serum vitamin B12, (v) negative CSF PCR for herpesviruses, (vi) negative CSF syphilis tests. All diagnostic tests – [class IV].
Treatment
HAART [class III] (Di Rocco et al., 2000; Staudinger and Henry, 2000).
HIV polyneuropathy
Polyneuropathies do occur frequently in the course of HIV infection. The pathogenesis is poorly understood and treatment is largely restricted to symptomatic pain therapy.
Diagnosis
The most important neuropathy in HIV infection is the distal sensory polyneuropathy. Its pathogenesis is unclear. This neuropathy is indistinguishable from the toxic neuropathy caused by the nucleosides zalcitabine, didanosine, and stavudine. Symptoms of paraesthesiae and pain predominate; disability caused by loss of sensory or motor function is less prominent. Electrodiagnostic studies may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis but may not be necessary in all cases.
Treatment
Symptomatic treatment: (i) amitriptyline 25–100 mg/day [class I], (ii) tramadol 50 mg three times daily to 100 mg four times daily [class I] and (iii) carbamazepine 200 mg three or four times daily [class I] (Sindrup and Jensen, 1999). Gabapentin is a promising drug (2400–3600 mg/day), but has not been studied in RCT.
Summary and conclusions
Despite the success of HAART, HIV-infected individuals are at risk for a variety of neurological complications. The risk for those complications increases with an increasing level of immunodeficiency. Those patients with CD4 cell counts below 200 × 106/ml are particularly at risk for opportunistic infections, lymphoma and HIV dementia. Nucleic acid amplification in the CSF by PCR have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy in PML, CMV infections, primary CNS lymphoma and HIV dementia. Besides HAART, specific treatment options are available for the majority of these complications. In general, the task force recommends rapidity in evaluating these patients in order to limit damage to the nervous system.