Volume 28, Issue 7 pp. 941-958
Full Access

Who Supports Free Trade in Latin America?

Eugene Beaulieu

Eugene Beaulieu

University of Calgary and International Trade Canada,

Search for more papers by this author
Ravindra A. Yatawara

Ravindra A. Yatawara

University of Delaware and

Search for more papers by this author
Wei Guo Wang

Wei Guo Wang

University of Calgary

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 July 2005
Citations: 30

Abstract

This paper examines individual trade policy preferences across 17 countries in Latin America. The focus is on whether skilled or unskilled workers are more likely to support liberalised trade and on whether country characteristics, such as factor endowments, alter the preferences of skilled and unskilled workers. Based on the standard Heckscher-Ohlin model and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, wage inequality in developing countries will decrease under free trade and unskilled workers will benefit. We find that on average skilled workers are more likely than unskilled workers to support free trade in Latin American countries. Separate country regressions reveal that this pattern is only statistically significant in 8 out of 17 Latin American countries. However, there are no countries in our sample in which unskilled workers are statistically more likely to support free trade than skilled workers, not even in the lowest skill-endowed country in the sample. We also find that people from Latin American countries with higher GDP, faster growth, more cropland and a longer period of time since reform were more likely on average to support free trade.

Footnotes

  • The authors thank Vivek Dehejia, Rick Harris and Gary Sawchuk and the editors for very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Comments from participants at the Western Economic Association meetings in Vancouver 2004 and the Canadian Economic Association meetings in Toronto 2004 were very helpful. Eugene Beaulieu acknowledges financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and would like to acknowledge and thank Carleton University and International Trade Canada for space and support while visiting in 2004/05.
    • The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.