Volume 16, Issue 11 pp. 1153-1165

A factorial study of ondansetron, metoclopramide, and dexamethasone for emesis prophylaxis after adenotonsillectomy in children

JOEL B. GUNTER MD

JOEL B. GUNTER MD

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
JOHN J. McAULIFFE MD, MBA

JOHN J. McAULIFFE MD, MBA

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
EILEEN C. BECKMAN BSN

EILEEN C. BECKMAN BSN

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
ERIC P. WITTKUGEL MD

ERIC P. WITTKUGEL MD

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
JAMES P. SPAETH MD

JAMES P. SPAETH MD

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
ANNA M. VARUGHESE MD, MPH

ANNA M. VARUGHESE MD, MPH

Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 August 2006
Citations: 24
Joel B. Gunter, MD, Professor, Clinical Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45249, USA (email: [email protected]).

Summary

Background: We conducted a factorial study of emesis prophylaxis with ondansetron (OND), metoclopramide (MET), and dexamethasone (DEX).

Methods: After informed parental consent, 240 children having adenotonsillectomy were randomized to one of 15 combinations of OND (0–60 μg·kg−1), MET (0–400 μg·kg−1), and/or DEX (0–500 μg·kg−1). Using multivariable logistic regression, models were generated for the probability of emesis before discharge, after discharge and overall for 24 h.

Results: Odds of emesis increased by a factor of three to four for children older than 7 years. Before discharge, odds of emesis decreased by factors of 0.29 for each 15 μg·kg−1 of OND and 0.37 for each 100 μg·kg−1 of MET. After discharge, odds of emesis decreased by a factor of 0.67 for each 125 μg·kg−1 of DEX and increased by a factor of 3.5 for emesis before discharge. Over 24 h, odds of emesis decreased with OND, MET, and DEX (ORs as above). A negative interaction between OND and MET was seen before discharge and over 24 h, reducing the efficacy of their combination.

Conclusions: We present novel study design and methods of analysis which are uniquely suited to studies of multiple interventions. Factorial design was a powerful tool, allowing simultaneous determination of dose–response relationships for three drugs and identifying a previously unreported negative interaction between OND and MET.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.