Volume 30, Issue 1 pp. 11-20

A comparison of two dosing regimens of zidovudine in Thai adults with early symptomatic HIV infection. Conducting clinical HIV trials in South-East Asia

P. Phanuphak

P. Phanuphak

Professor of Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University; Director, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre; Head, HIV Clinic of Chulakongkorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
M. L. Grayson

Corresponding Author

M. L. Grayson

Director, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology Department, Monash Medical Centre; Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic; Previously: Fellow, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Dr M. Lindsay Grayson, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology Department, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic 3168. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
S. Sirivichayakul

S. Sirivichayakul

Chief Scientist, Clinical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
S. Suwanagool

S. Suwanagool

Professor and Chairman, Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University; Head, HIV Clinic of Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
K. Ruxrungtham

K. Ruxrungtham

Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
M. Hanvanich

M. Hanvanich

Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
W. Ratanasuwan

W. Ratanasuwan

Instructor, Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
S. Ubolyam

S. Ubolyam

Medical Technologist, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Search for more papers by this author
M. D. Hughes

M. D. Hughes

Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Search for more papers by this author
C. A. Wanke

C. A. Wanke

Assistant Professor, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

*Associate Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA 0211.

Search for more papers by this author
S. M. Hammer

S. M. Hammer

Associate Professor, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

†Professor of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Columbia Presbyterian Center of the New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 March 2008
Citations: 7

Abstract

Aim: To compare the clinical and immunological efficacy, and tolerance of two dosage regimens of zidovudine (ZDV) in an adult Thai population with early symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and to identify important clinical issues associated with conducting HIV trials in South-East Asia.

Methods: HIV-infected Thai adults, with early symptomatic HIV disease and CD4 lymphocyte counts less than 400/mm3, who were managed in the infectious diseases clinics at two university teaching hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand, were enrolled in a randomised, open-label, dose-regimen comparison trial of ZDV. Two oral ZDV dosing regimens: regimen A, 100 mg tid+200 mg nocte (ZDV-A) vs regimen B, 250 mg bid (ZDV-B) were compared. The main outcome measures were:

1. Clinical efficacy: rate of progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death.

2. Immunologic efficacy: changes in CD4 lymphocyte numbers compared to baseline; rate of decline of CD4 lymphocyte numbers to less than 100/mm3.

3. Toxicity, as defined by clinical symptomatology and laboratory parameters.

Results: Two hundred and four patients were enrolled (103 ZDV-A; 101 ZDV-B) of whom 195 were followed beyond baseline. Patients were typical of those encountered with HIV in Thailand: mean age 33 years; 89% male; 88% heterosexual HIV acquisition; mean baseline CD4 lymphocyte count 241/mm3. Follow-up while on therapy was comparable for the two groups (mean +SD): 533+236 days (ZDV-A) vs 5925210 days (ZDV-B). One hundred and eleven patients (57%; 51 ZDV-A, 60 ZDV-B) were treated for at least 22 months (669530 days). Clinical and immunological outcomes for ZDV-A and ZDV-B, including rate of progression to AIDS or death, development of non-AIDS-defining opportunistic infections, mean changes in CD4 lymphocyte numbers/mm3, difference in area under the CD4:time distribution curve and difference in the rate of decline of CD4 lymphocyte numbers to less than 100/mm3, were not significantly different. The presence of oral hairy leukoplakia or unintential weight loss of 10–20% at enrolment were significantly associated with the later development of AIDS (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). ZDV-associated toxicity was similar for both regimens. Maintaining protocol adherence and appropriate clinical follow-up emerged as important practical issues.

Conclusion: In Thai adults, ZDV 100 mg tid+200 mg nocte and ZDV 250 mg bid have similar clinical and immunological efficacy. Rates of ZDV toxicity are comparable to those reported in non-Asian populations. Despite limitations in medical care access and maintaining long-term follow-up, successful trials of antiretroviral agents are feasible in South-East Asia and multi-drug treatment trials should be pursued in appropriate institutions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.