Volume 12, Issue 2 pp. 220-226

Reattendance at hospital for asthma in two Australian states, 2000–2003

Patricia K. CORRELL

Corresponding Author

Patricia K. CORRELL

Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research,

Patricia K. Correll, Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, PO Box M77, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australian. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Wei XUAN

Wei XUAN

Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research,

Search for more papers by this author
Margaret WILLIAMSON

Margaret WILLIAMSON

Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research,

Search for more papers by this author
Vijaya SUNDARARAJAN

Vijaya SUNDARARAJAN

Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Clare RINGLAND

Clare RINGLAND

New South Wales Department of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, and

Search for more papers by this author
Guy B. MARKS

Guy B. MARKS

Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 February 2007
Citations: 9

Abstract

Objective and background:  Reattendance rates at hospitals and emergency departments (ED) can provide a valuable marker of the quality and effectiveness of clinical care. Linked hospital and ED data from New South Wales and Victoria, Australia, were used to examine reattendances for asthma.

Methods:  Hospital and ED data were linked to identify individuals who reattended hospital or ED for asthma within 28 days of an initial attendance. The sociodemographic characteristics that predicted reattendance were examined using logistic regression.

Results:  There were 139 043 attendances for asthma between July 2000 and June 2003 attributed to 95 042 people. Overall, 7.1% of people reattended for asthma within 28 days. There was a significantly higher risk of reattendance among females (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.14), people who lived in areas of greater socioeconomic disadvantage (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12–1.29) and Indigenous people (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00–1.32). Reattendance rates differed among age groups (P < 0.001), with the lowest rate being in 5- to 14-year-olds.

Conclusion:  The availability of linked hospital and ED data has provided a rare opportunity to investigate predictors of reattendance for asthma. Surveillance of trends in reattendances for asthma can be used to monitor the effectiveness of interventions to improve asthma control across the continuum of care, particularly in higher-risk groups such as Indigenous people, young children and those with greater socioeconomic disadvantage.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.