Volume 44, Issue 7-8 pp. 444-448

How useful is knemometry in measuring neonatal growth?

Bronwyn Dixon

Corresponding Author

Bronwyn Dixon

Neonatal Service, Christchurch Womens' Hospital and

Dr Bronwyn Dixon, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Private Bag 4711, Christchurch 8014, New Zealand. Fax: +64 336 44883; email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Brian Darlow

Brian Darlow

Neonatal Service, Christchurch Womens' Hospital and

Departments of Paediatrics and

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy Prickett

Timothy Prickett

Endocrinology, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 July 2008
Citations: 5

Abstract

Background:  Knemometry has been used to accurately measure linear growth in both neonates and children over the last 20 years. It has been used principally as a research tool.

Aim:  To investigate whether serial measurement of lower leg length (LLL) by knemometry is a useful addition to other measures of growth in the neonatal unit.

Methods:  A 1-year prospective hospital-based cohort study from 2004 to 2005. Knemometry was performed every 3–4 days from the time of consent to time of discharge. Infants were grouped by gestation at birth for analysis (<28 weeks, 28–31 weeks, 32–36 weeks and >36 weeks gestation). The main outcome assessed was longitudinal growth. Subgroup analyses were performed on infants <10th percentile for weight, surgical infants and infants who had received antenatal steroids.

Results:  LLL measured by knemometry correlated well with postmenstrual age (r = 0.93) and weight (r = 0.93). The mean (SD) increase in LLL was 0.45 (0.7) mm/day.

Conclusion:  Change in LLL correlates well with change in weight and postmenstrual age in the neonatal period but adds little extra information to routine practice in the neonatal unit.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.