Volume 25, Issue 2 pp. 86-88
Full Access

Comparison of preservative-free and preservative-containing ipratropium bromide

R. L. HENRY MB, BS, FRACP

Corresponding Author

R. L. HENRY MB, BS, FRACP

Senior Lecturer in Paediatrics

University of Newcastle, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Dr R. Henry, Department of Paediatrics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia.Search for more papers by this author
R. G. HANKIN SRN

R. G. HANKIN SRN

Research Nurse

University of Newcastle, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
R. ABRAMSON BA

R. ABRAMSON BA

Post Dip Appl Psych

University of Newcastle, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: April 1989
Citations: 2

Abstract

Abstract A double-blind crossover study was performed on 33 children with asthma to compare the effectiveness of nebulized solutions of preservative-containing and preservative-free ipratropium bromide. Both solutions produced bronchodilation. No significant differences were found between the two solutions at any time after nebulization in minimum and maximum changes from baseline value or in the areas under the lung function time curves. The presently formulated preservative-containing ipratropium bromide solution was not shown to be inferior to a preservative-free compound.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.