The attitudes, knowledge and skills needed in mental health nurses: The perspective of users of mental health services*
Corresponding Author
Sharon E. Rydon
School of Health Sciences, Albany Campus, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
Sharon E. Rydon, M. Phil (Nursing), RPN, RGON, BA.
Sharon E. Rydon, Manukau Institute of Technology, Newbury Street, Private Bag 94006, Manukau City, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sharon E. Rydon
School of Health Sciences, Albany Campus, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
Sharon E. Rydon, M. Phil (Nursing), RPN, RGON, BA.
Sharon E. Rydon, Manukau Institute of Technology, Newbury Street, Private Bag 94006, Manukau City, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorThis research was undertaken as partial fulfilment of the requirement of a degree of Master in Philosophy (Nursing) through Massey University, Albany Campus, Private Bag 102 904, Northshore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand. Consent for the project was, therefore, obtained through Massey University's Human Ethics Committee (Albany) and the Auckland Ethics Committee, Auckland. As the author is employed at Manukau Institute of Technology, Newbury Street, Private Bag 94006, Manukau City, Auckland, New Zealand, research funding was obtained from that institution's Research and Ethics Committee.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Knowledge about the practice and roles of mental health nurses in New Zealand is currently limited. In a sociopolitical climate where the views of users of mental health services are increasingly incorporated into education and the planning and delivery of services, there is a need for research that reflects the perspective of users. In this study a qualitative descriptive methodology with focus group interviews was used to explore with users of mental health services, the attitudes, knowledge and skills that they need in mental health nurses. Users of mental health services valued the therapeutic work of mental health nurses, and identified positive attitudes towards users of mental health services as essential in mental health nurses. However, they did not consistently experience a therapeutic approach in their interactions with mental health nurses.
REFERENCES
- Anonymous (1993). Coming out: My experience as a mental patient. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 31 (5), 17–20.
- Baker, R. & Hinton, R. (1999). Do focus groups facilitate meaningful participation in social research? In: R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds). Developing Focus Groups: Politics, Processes and Practice (pp. 79–98). London: Sage.
- Barker, P. & Ritter, S. (1996). Empowering service users: The myth, the reality and the hope. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 3, 391–394.
- Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 14, 4–7.
- Beech, P. & Norman, I. (1995). Patients’ perceptions of the quality of psychiatric nursing care: Findings from a small-scale descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 4, 117–123.
- Benson, A. (1994). Two centuries of asylum: The end of an era in the history of the treatment of the mentally ill. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 3, 29–34.
- Berger, E., Carter, A., Casey, D. & Litchefield, L. (1996). What's happening with consumer participation? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 5, 131–135.
- Brink, P. & Wood, M. (1978). Basic Steps in Planning Nursing Research. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
- Champ, S. (1998). A most precious thread. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 7, 54–59.
- Cleary, M., Edwards, C. & Meehan, T. (1999). Factors influencing nurse–patient interaction in the acute psychiatric setting: An exploratory investigation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 8, 109–116.
- Connor, H. (1999). Collaboration or chaos: A consumer perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 8, 79–85.
- Cote-Arsenault, D. & Morrison-Beedy, D. (1999). Practical advice for planning and conducting focus groups. Nursing Research, 48, 280–283.
- Crotty, M. (1999). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage Publications.
- Crowe, M. (1997). An analysis of the sociopolitical context of mental health nursing practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 6, 59–65.
- Danaher, G., Schirato, T. & Webb, J. (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
- Edwards, K. (1995). A preliminary study of users’ and nursing students’ views of the role of the mental health nurse. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 222–229.
- Evans, A. (1995). Philosophy of nursing: Future directions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 4, 14–21.
- Fain, J. (1999). Reading, Understanding, and Applying Nursing Research. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
- Farrington, A. (1992). Mental health nursing: Now you see us: Now you don’t. British Journal of Nursing, 1, 272.
-
Farrow, T. (2001). Owning their expertise: Why nurses use ‘no suicide contracts’ rather than their own assessments.
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 11, 214–219.
10.1046/j.1440-0979.2002.00251.x Google Scholar
- Gijbels, H. (1995). Mental health nursing skills in an acute admission environment: Perceptions of mental Health nurses and other mental health professionals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 460–465.
- Happell, B., Pinikahana, J. & Roper, C. (2002). Attitudes of postgraduate nursing students towards consumer participation in mental health services and the role of the consumer academic. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 11, 240–250.
- Heaton, J. (1999). The gaze and visibility of the carer: A Foucauldian analysis of the discourse of informal care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 759–777.
- Hummelvoll, J. K. & Severinsson, E. (2001). Coping with everyday reality: Mental health professionals’ reflections on the care provided in an acute psychiatric ward. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 10, 156–166.
- Keddy, B. (1996). A feminist critique of psychiatric nursing discourse. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 17, 381–391.
- Mental Health Commission (1998a). Consumer and Family Opinion About Mental Health Services. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
- Mental Health Commission (1998b). Blueprint for Mental Health Services in New Zealand. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
- Mental Health Commission (2000). The Discrimination Times. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
- Mental Health Commission (2001). Recovery Competencies for New Zealand Mental Health Workers. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
- Ministry of Health (1996). Towards Better Mental Health Services. The report of the National Working Party on Mental Health Workforce Development. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
- Ministry of Health (1997). Moving Forward: The National Mental Health Plan for More and Better Services. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
- Ministry of Health (2000). Guidelines to Involving Families/Whanau of Mental Health Consumers/Tangata Whai Ora in Care, Assessment, and Treatment Processes. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
- Moyle, W. (2003). Nurse–patient relationship: A dichotomy of expectations. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12, 103–109.
- Muller, A. & Poggenpoel, M. (1996). Patients’ internal world experiences of interacting with psychiatric nurses. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, X, 143–150.
- O'Brien, A. J. (1999). Negotiating the relationship: Mental health nurses’ perceptions of their practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 8, 153–161.
- O'Brien, A. J. (2000). The therapeutic relationship: Perceptions of mental health nurses (Master's Thesis). Albany, New Zealand: Massey University.
- Onega, L. (1991). A theoretical framework for psychiatric nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 68–73.
- Peterson, D. (1998). Ethical Research with Mental Health Consumers. Mental Health Occasional Publications (1). Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
- Porter, S. (1993). The determinants of psychiatric nursing practice: A comparison of sociological perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1559–1566.
- Prebble, K. & McDonald, B. (1997). Adaptation to the mental health setting: The lived experience of comprehensive nurse graduates. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 6, 30–36.
- Reinhard, S. (1994). Perspectives on the family's caregiving experience in mental illness. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26, 70–74.
- Richmond, I. & Roberson, E. (1995). The customer is always right: Patients’ perceptions of psychiatric nursing actions. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 9, 36–43.
- Rogers, A. & Pilgrim, D. (1994). Service users’ views of psychiatric nurses. British Journal of Nursing, 3, 16–18.
- Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334–340.
- Seaman, C. (1987). Research Methods: Principles, Practice, and Theory for Nursing, 3rd edn. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
- Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
- Walsh, K. (1994). Ontology and the nurse–patient relationship in psychiatric nursing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 3, 113–118.
-
Walton, P. (2000). Psychiatric hospital care – a case of the more things change, the more they remain the same.
Journal of Mental Health, 9, 77–88.
10.1080/09638230016976 Google Scholar
- Webster, D. C. (1996). The culture of psychiatric nursing. In Culture and Caring: Caring in Culture (pp. 19–36). The Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Australian and New Zealand College Of Mental Health Nurses Inc., October 10–13. New Zealand: Australian and New Zealand College of Mental Health Nurses.
- Yoder, S. D. & Rode, M. W. (1990). How are you doing? Patient evaluations of nursing actions. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 28, 26–30.