Volume 47, Issue s4 pp. 115-119
Free Access

Lessons Learned from Cloning Dogs

MJ Kim

MJ Kim

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
HJ Oh

HJ Oh

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
GA Kim

GA Kim

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
JE Park

JE Park

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
EJ Park

EJ Park

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
G Jang

G Jang

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
JC Ra

JC Ra

Stem Cell Research Center, RNL BIO, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
SK Kang

SK Kang

Stem Cell Research Center, RNL BIO, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
BC Lee

BC Lee

Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 July 2012
Citations: 10
Author’s address (for correspondence): BC Lee, Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]

Contents

The aim of this article is to review dog cloning research and to suggest its applications based on a discussion about the normality of cloned dogs. Somatic cell nuclear transfer was successfully used for production of viable cloned puppies despite limited understanding of in vitro dog embryo production. Cloned dogs have similar growth characteristics to those born from natural fertilization, with no evidence of serious adverse effects. The offspring of cloned dogs also have similar growth performance and health to those of naturally bred puppies. Therefore, cloning in domestic dogs can be applied as an assisted reproductive technique to conserve endangered species, to treat sterile canids or aged dogs, to improve reproductive performance of valuable individuals and to generate disease model animals.

Introduction

Cloning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) is an assisted reproductive technology (ART) used to improve reproduction and to produce valuable human disease models, because applications of advanced ARTs in domestic dogs have been very limited compared to other mammals. Although artificial insemination (AI), the conventional ARTs, with sperm chilling and cryopreservation has been highly successful and resulted in widespread use and distribution of sperm (Thomassen and Farstad 2009), the results of other technologies, for example, in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, are extremely limited (Chastant-Maillard et al. 2010). Therefore, alternative technologies are required to improve canine ARTs, especially to preserve female genetics, non-reproductive males, deceased individuals, etc. Because the first successful mammalian cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) was reported (Campbell et al. 1996), numerous species including cattle (Cibelli et al. 1998), pigs (Polejaeva et al. 2000), goats (Baguisi et al. 1999) and dogs (Lee et al. 2005) have been cloned, along with considerable improvements in SCNT technology. After the first cloned dog, Snuppy, was born, several varieties and breeds of viable cloned puppies have now been produced including transgenic dogs. Here, we review embryo production by SCNT in dogs (Jang et al. 2008, Oh et al. 2009, Hong et al. 2009a, Hong et al. 2009b, Kim et al. 2011) and the normality of cloned dogs and discuss applications of SCNT embryo technology in dogs.

Overview of Dog Cloning

Cloning in dogs has relied heavily on the female’s natural reproductive ability, because of unique reproductive features characterized by a monoestrual, polyovulatory and non-seasonal reproductive cycle, ovulation of oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage, and delayed meiotic resumption of ovulated oocytes (Johnston et al. 2001). These features require numerous adaptations of in vivo/vitro methods commonly and efficiently used in other species. Although a mature oocyte with MII cytoplast is essential for SCNT (Cibelli et al. 2002), in vitro maturation rates of canine oocytes still remain low (Otoi et al. 2000, Kim et al. 2007a) compared to results in farm animals (Galli and Lazzari 2008). Therefore, protocols to collect in vivo matured oocytes surgically by flushing oviducts have been developed (Lee et al. 2005), and between six and 12 oocytes can be collected during one oestrus cycle of each bitch, with an average recovery rate up to 93.8% recovery rate (Kim et al. 2010). Because ovulation induction is also not well established in dogs, natural ovulation of the oocyte donor dog and recipient has to be predicted by serum progesterone concentration (ovulation occurs at 4.0–9.9 ng/ml) and vaginal smears (Lee et al. 2005, Johnston SD et al. 2001).

Since the first cloned dog, named Snuppy (Seoul National University puppy), was reported by Lee et al. (2005), a total of 40 non-transgenic puppies and 12 transgenic cloned puppies have been reported (Table 1). A variety of donor cells have been used including male and female, adult and foetal fibroblasts, young and aged donor dogs, small and large breeds, fibroblasts and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and even genetically modified cells (Lee et al. 2005; Jang et al. 2007, 2008; Hong et al. 2009a,b; Kim et al. 2011; Oh et al. 2011). Electrofusion of a cytoplast with a donor cell transferred into the perivitelline space of an enucleated oocyte in dogs is carried out by needle fusion, with a success rate up to 83.5% (Park et al. 2011). After electrofusion and chemical activation, the reconstructed embryos are immediately transferred to a spontaneously synchronous recipient because in vitro culture protocol has not yet been established in dogs (Lee et al. 2005). Cloning efficiency (number of puppies/transferred embryos) was higher in nulliparous than in multiparous recipients, but synchronization between the oocyte donor dog and recipient within 1 day did not influence efficiency (Kim et al. 2010).

Table 1. Production of non-transgenic cloned dogs through somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos
Breed Sex No. of pregnant/recipient No. of delivered pups/embryos transferred No. of dead pups within 1 month after delivery Reference
Afghan hound Male 3/123 2/1095 1 (Lee et al. 2005)
Afghan hound Female 3/12 3/167 0 (Jang et al. 2007)
Toy poodle Female 2/20 1/358 0 (Jang et al. 2008)
Beagle Female 1/2 2/50 0 (Hong et al. 2009a)
Mixed Female 6/29 6/482 2 (Hossein et al. 2009b)
Beagle Male 4/36 5/712 1 (Hossein et al. 2009a)
Sapsaree dog Male 2/15 2/309 1 (Jang et al. 2009)
Golden retriever Male/female 4/39 4/664 1 (Kim et al. 2009)
Labrador retriever Male 4/18 10/400 3 (Oh et al. 2009)
Labrador retriever Female 1/8 4/130 0 (Park et al. 2009b)
Pekingese Female 3/16 1/180 0 (Park et al. 2011)

Normality of Cloned Dogs

Growth characteristics including body weight, height, development and haematologic profiles were all determined in cloned dogs and compared with controls and cell donor dogs (Park et al. 2010). Apart from some variations in body weight, differences were also observed in dental development (Park et al. 2010), but variable dentition has been reported in several breeds (Arnall 1961). Age-specific haematologic and serum biochemical values in cloned dogs were similar to those of control dogs (Park et al. 2010). It can be concluded that cloned dogs derived from SCNT had similar growth characteristics to dogs born after natural fertilization without any evidence of significant adverse effects. Reproductive characteristics were reported for two female cloned beagles, specifically their hormonal profiles and ovarian follicular development after puberty (Hong et al. 2010). The first oestrus of the clones was within the reference range (Hong et al. 2010). Serum progesterone concentration could be used to predict ovulation in cloned dogs as in non-cloned dogs, and other hormones including estradiol, LH and FSH were similar to levels in non-cloned dogs (Hong et al. 2010). The normal morphological changes of ovarian follicles during proestrus and early oestrus observed with ultrasonography were also similar to non-cloned dogs (Hong et al. 2010). The reproductive competence of cloned dogs was also investigated. The in vivo development of embryos produced by AI between a cloned male and a non-cloned female dog showed normal development, and AI between a cloned male and cloned female dogs resulted in successful birth of the next generation (Park et al. 2009a). The offspring from cloned dogs have similar growth performance and health to those of naturally bred puppies (Park et al. 2009a).

The risk of birth defects in neonates born following cloning is a major concern. Large offspring syndrome has been observed in bovine and ovine cloned offspring (Young et al. 1998). There have also been some reports about abnormalities in cloned dogs (Kim et al. 2009; Hong et al. 2011a), but it is still controversial.

Applications of Dog Cloning

Conservation of endangered species

The number of species on the Species Survival Commission’s Red List is increasing because of human activities. Of the 5487 mammal species, nearly one-quarter (1219) are globally threatened or extinct (http://www.iucnredlist.org/). To maintain genetic biodiversity and reduce the interval between generations, ARTs for endangered species have been developed (Pukazhenthi et al. 2005). Cloning has the potential to be a powerful tool for preservation of endangered animals. The first successful cloning attempt in endangered canids was the gray wolf (Canis lupus) that is considered a threatened species in many countries (Kim et al. 2007b). Because of limited availability of oocytes and recipients, interspecies SCNT has been used to clone the endangered animals, using a wolf somatic cell and a dog oocyte and recipient (Kim et al. 2007b; Oh et al. 2008). The mitochondrial (mt) DNA sequences in the cloned wolf offspring were identical to those of the oocyte donor dog, in agreement with results in a cloned gaur (Lanza et al. 2000) and mouflon (Loi et al. 2001). Furthermore, a fibroblast derived from a gray wolf 6 h after death was also successfully cloned (Oh et al. 2008). Therefore, interspecies SCNT in dogs can be used for preservation of endangered canine species, both within a conservation programme and also in extreme situations involving sudden death. Two clones of the Sapsaree breed, which is registered as a national monument in South Korea, were produced using mixed breed dog oocytes (Jang et al. 2009). The clones were genetically identical to the nuclear donor dog, but their mtDNA originated from the oocyte donor dogs (Jang et al. 2009). Thus, if a female clone breeds with a wild-type male, the mtDNA of their progeny would be derived from the oocyte donor dog. In contrast, although cloned males obtained their mtDNA from oocyte donor dogs, the mtDNA of their sperm is not transmitted to their progeny, indicating that genetic characteristics of an individual can pass to the second generation. Therefore, cloning of male endangered species can be recommended for conservation programme.

Cloning of pet dogs

The reproductive ability of dogs is terminated or impaired due to removal of the reproductive organs or due to age. Removal of a dog’s reproductive organs may be indicated because of disease, to prevent further diseases, or most commonly to prevent breeding. More than 80% of sexually intact male dogs >5 years old had benign prostatic hypertrophy, and in most cases, castration is a recommended treatment (Memon 2007). Even in healthy older dogs, pregnancy is not recommended. Primipara >6 years old had low reproductive ability, because of special obstetric conditions and stillbirths compared with young primipara (Munnich and Kuchenmeister 2009). Thus, it is difficult to propagate neutered or old dogs with impaired reproductive ability using conventional methods. As an alternative, cloning can restore reproductive ability in such cases (Jang et al. 2008; Park et al. 2009b). A 14-year-old toy poodle was cloned using a large breed dog as a recipient (Jang et al. 2008). Telomere lengths of the clone were not significantly different from those of the aged donor dog or the age-matched control dog (Jang et al. 2008). In addition, a dead pet dog can also be reproduced by SCNT, if some cells are maintained permanently by cryopreservation to preserve chromosome stability and genetic integrity. The first commercially cloned pet dogs were five pit bull terriers produced in 2008, 3 years after the cell donor had died (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7542338.stm).

Propagation of elite dogs

Most of the genetic information, except mt DNA, is transmitted from a somatic cell donor to a clone. Although some differences can be seen in phenotypes of cloned animals, especially related to epigenetic reprogramming (Schmidt-Kuntzel et al. 2009), characteristics related to nuclear genetic information can be passed on to the clones, so that a clone could inherit elite ability from the cell donor if the related gene is naturally present or inserted into the donor’s genome. Because re-cloned dogs have been obtained, theoretically, infinite propagation of the elite ability is also possible. Therefore, cloning can be a powerful tool to produce dogs with an excellent talent identical to that of their donors because an elite dog’s abilities cannot be passed on to the next generation via other ARTs. For example, it is believed that the scent sniffing ability of a dog originates from the anatomical structure of the nasal cavity (Craven et al. 2007) or from gene expression in olfactory receptors (Robin et al. 2009). In a cancer-sniffing dog, the sensitivity of scent detection in stool samples from patients with colorectal cancer compared with conventional diagnosis by colonoscopy was 0.97 and the specificity was 0.99 (Sonoda et al. 2011). The accuracy of canine scent detection was high even for early cancer (Sonoda et al. 2011). To propagate the cancer-sniffing dog, SCNT technology was applied. Successful cloning of a cancer-sniffing dog was reported, and four clones were generated from a female neutered dog; the clones are growing and healthy without apparent abnormalities (Park et al. 2009b). To evaluate the success of cloning technology for propagation of the cancer-sniffing dogs, the sniffing talent in the cloned dogs is currently being tested and compared to the donor dogs; the results will be reported after a complete evaluation.

Production of transgenic cloned dogs

Dogs have been used as animal models for human diseases because of the similarities in their size, longevity and physiology to humans. Of the nearly 580 known hereditary diseases described in the dog, more than half (288) can be potential models for human diseases (http://omia.angis.org.au, accessed May 2012). Because production of transgenic large animals using pronucleus injection or homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells is not available, recent successes in creating transgenic animals (Schnieke et al. 1997; Cibelli et al. 1998; Dai et al. 2002) using SCNT give promise to future generation of genetically modified models in large animals including dogs.

Up until now, two kinds of transgenic dogs expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) genes constitutively (Hong et al. 2009b) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) genes conditionally (Kim et al. 2011) have been reported. All the dogs were delivered healthy at birth except two: one pup died at day 10 after birth because of interstitial pneumonia (Kim et al. 2011) and the other died because of chronic bronchopneumonia at 11 weeks after birth (Hong et al. 2011b). Regarding the death of the transgenic pups, it is difficult to conclude that the integration of transgenes into their genome was the cause of the health problems because the death frequency of cloned pups is within the reference range (Johnston et al. 2001). In addition, transgenic dogs born by SCNT exhibited normal reproductive ability, and the exogeneous gene was successfully transmitted to their progeny as well as stable insertion of the transgene into the genome (Hong et al. 2011c; Kim et al. 2011). Therefore, the previous results indicate that SCNT technology in dogs can be applied to produce transgenic dogs.

On the basis of the previous successful cloning of RFP or GFP transgenic dogs, we are now producing transgenic dogs for application to the neuronal degenerative Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although the pathogenesis of AD has been a subject of intensive research for the last several decades worldwide, treatment or preventive measures have so far produced no breakthrough because of the lack of appropriate AD models. Mouse models have a limitation for AD research because the irreconcilable species gap between rodents and humans has impeded the research itself as well as the translation of findings from rodent studies to human cases (Kokjohn and Roher, 2009). As an alternative to the mouse model, we performed a preliminary study to produce a transgenic dog that expresses a neuron-specific RFP transgene in brain by SCNT. A transgenic dog expressing the RFP transgene in neural cells of the brain under human synapsin 1 promoter was generated (Oh et al. 2012), indicating that the human synapsin promoter is functional. Currently, we are performing a study to produce a neural-specific transgene expressing dog, which will be a pivotal animal model for neurodegenerative AD.

Conclusions

Conventional ARTs in canids have developed relatively slowly, but dog embryo biotechnologies via SCNT have developed remarkably since the first successful attempts at dog cloning. Even though several obstacles still need to be overcome to increase cloning efficiency, it is clear that embryos produced in vitro through SCNT can develop normally in vivo. A number of live pups were delivered after embryo transfer, and normal growth patterns and reproduction have been established in cloned dogs and also in the second generation of the cloned animals. Therefore, dog cloning can be a useful tool to increase canine fertility and reproduction, and it can be applied to the treatment of infertility and improvement of the reproductive performance of valuable individuals, as well as to the production of clinically valuable disease models.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by IPET (#311011-05-1-SB010, #311062-04-1-SB010), RNL Bio (#0468-20110001), MKE (#10033839-2011-13), Institute for Veterinary Science, the BK21 program and Nestle′ Purina PetCare. Korea. We thank Dr. Barry D. Bavister for his valuable editing of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of interest

    None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.