Volume 26, Issue 3 pp. 477-480
Full Access

Length–weight relationships of fishes collected from the Korangi-Phitti Creek area (Indus delta, northern Arabian Sea)

S. M. Hussain

S. M. Hussain

NAPHIS, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Islamabad, Pakistan

Search for more papers by this author
R. Paperno

R. Paperno

Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Melbourne, FL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Z. Khatoon

Z. Khatoon

Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Melbourne, FL, USA

Pakistan Council of Scientific & Industrial Research Laboratory Complex, Karachi, Pakistan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 May 2010
Citations: 18
Author’s address: Richard Paperno, Florida Fish & Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1220 Prospect Ave, Suite 285 Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.
E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Length–weight relationships of 41 fish species (20 families) collected from the Korangi-Phitti Creek area on the northern side of the Indus delta at the northern Arabian Sea are presented. This study provides first reports of length–weight relationships for seven species (Sardinella brachysoma, Arius arius, Trachinotus mookalee, Nuchequula blochii, Gerres limbatus, Brachirus orientalis, and Synaptura commersonnii). The coefficients of determination (r2) were > 0.90 for 35 species. Estimates of b ranged from a minimum 2.204 for Liza carinata to a maximum of 3.535 for Pseudorhombus arsius; 16 species showed isometric growth (b =3), eight species showed positive allometric growth (b >3), while 17 species showed negative allometric growth (b <3).

Introduction

The Korang-Phitti Creek area is located on the northern side of the Indus delta in the northern Arabian Sea. This complex network of small creeks has vast mangrove-dominated areas that serve as nursery and spawning grounds for many important pelagic and demersal fish species. As a result of the area's productivity, it is exploited by small-scale fishermen; overfishing of certain fish stocks in the creeks have been a matter of great concern as the number of fishermen escalate each year (Meynell, 1995). Despite the importance of the fisheries within the region, no baseline biological data (i.e. length–weights) are available for many fish species from these waters. Such data are critical for comparing growth rates, examining age structure, or estimating production and biomass of the fish stocks (Ricker, 1975). In the present study, the parameters of the length–weight relationship are reported for 41 fish species (mangrove residents and important coastal fishes) that visit the Korangi-Phitti Creek area.

Materials and methods

Fish samples in the Korangi-Phitti Creek area (24°45′N, 67°20′E) were collected at 123 stations from February 1999 to December 2001. Monofilament gill nets of 8.9, 5.7, and 3.8 cm stretch mesh sizes were used. Multiple mesh sizes of gill nets were used in order to efficiently sample the wide range of size groups of fish encountered and to collect a range of immature to fully mature specimens. All fish were stored on ice in the field and brought to the laboratory where they were identified to the lowest possible taxon, measured to the nearest 0.1 cm total length (TL), and weighed to the nearest 0.01 g total weight (TW); where possible, the sex determined. Only combined values were reported when too few individuals were sexed to produce a significant relationship; total N represents the total number of fish in the catch and n represents the random subsample of fish measured after outliers were removed. Nomenclature for the families followed Nelson (2006).

Length–weight parameters were estimated for the entire sample of each species and by sex, as appropriate according to the following linear regression using PROC REG (SAS Institute, 1989): log TW = log a + b log TL, where TW = weight (g), TL = length (cm), a = y-intercept, and b = slope. To test for possible significant differences between sexes (P<0.05) a Student’s t-test was used for the comparison of two slopes (Zar, 1984). Outliers were identified in SAS (PROC REG, RSTUDENT option) using tests for influence. Only high influence points (Studentized residuals beyond ±2.96) believed to be due to measurement, recording, or identification error were removed from the data set before final parameter estimation. Outliers in small datasets (N ≤ 25) were identified using Dixon’s test statistic for outliers (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). A Student’s t-test was also performed to determine whether the estimated values of the slope (b) significantly deviated from isometric growth (b =3).

Results and discussion

A total of 14 196 fish representing 41 species, 33 genera, and 20 families were collected during the sampling period. The most abundant taxa were clupeids, Anodontostoma chacunda, Nematalosa nasus, and Sardinella gibbosa. The number of fish collected varied by species, ranging from a low of 10 individuals each for Brachirus orientalis and Synaptura commersonnii, to 5413 for S. gibbosa. Length–weight relationships of all 41 species are summarized in Table 1, which provides sample size (n), minimum and maximum total length, the length–weight parameters (a, b, sb), and the coefficient of determination (r2). Along with providing data on species from a previously understudied ecosystem, this study provides data on seven species in which there were no previous reports of length–weight relationships (Sardinella brachysoma, Arius arius, Trachinotus mookalee, Nuchequula blochii, Gerres limbatus, B. orientalis, and S. commersonnii).

Table 1.
Descriptive statistics and estimated parameters of length–weight relationship for 41 fish species, Korangi-Phitti Creek, Indus delta, northern Arabian Sea
Family Species Sex Total N n Total Length (cm) Parameter estimates
Min Max a b r 2 s b P
Albulidae Albula vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) Combined 37 37 19.2 40.0 −1.944 2.858 0.950 0.111
Pristigasteridae Ilisha megaloptera (Swainson, 1839) Combined 25 18 9.5 20.2 −1.742 2.779 0.949 0.161
Engraulidae Thryssa dussumieri (Valenciennes, 1848) Combined 94 94 5.4 11.4 −0.731 1.585 0.837 0.073
Thryssa hamiltonii (Gray, 1835) Combined 418 416 9.5 21.8 −2.594 3.362 0.924 0.047 0.968
Male 33 11.8 18.1 −2.340 3.144 0.940 0.143
Female 84 12.2 21.8 −2.341 3.151 0.950 0.080
Clupeidae Anodontostoma chacunda (Hamilton, 1822) Combined 1831 1696 9.4 19.9 −1.811 2.947 0.968 0.013 0.866
Male 654 9.4 18.9 −1.803 2.943 0.958 0.024
Female 868 10.1 19.9 −1.817 2.950 0.970 0.018
Hilsa kelee (Cuvier, 1829) Combined 151 147 9.7 15.6 −1.450 2.492 0.680 0.142
Nematalosa nasus (Bloch, 1795) Combined* 2088 2058 10.2 25.5 −1.873 2.946 0.922 0.019 0.002
Male 782 12.7 25.5 −1.448 2.609 0.835 0.042
Female 1131 10.2 25.0 −1.781 2.880 0.850 0.036
Sardinella brachysoma Bleeker, 1852 Combined 17 16 13.1 15.4 −2.500 3.444 0.907 0.294
Sardinella gibbosa (Bleeker, 1849) Combined 5413 2051 4.8 18.2 −1.108 3.058 0.853 0.028
Sardinella sindensis (Day, 1878) Combined 15 12 9.9 13.6 −1.918 2.899 0.866 0.361
Ariidae Arius arius (Hamilton, 1822) Combined 137 137 15.4 36.5 −5.401 3.161 0.953 0.060 0.080
Male 25 25 20.8 32.0 −5.863 3.361 0.945 0.170
Female 55 55 21.0 36.4 −5.042 3.013 0.951 0.093
Plicofollis tenuispinis (Day, 1877) Combined 51 48 18.2 38.0 −4.964 2.987 0.969 0.078 0.156
Male 13 13 18.2 32.4 −4.448 2.773 0.971 0.144
Female 24 22 21.6 38.0 −5.036 3.017 0.984 0.085
Mugilidae Liza carinata (Valenciennes, 1836) Combined 260 252 9.0 17.1 −1.052 2.205 0.723 0.086
Liza melinoptera (Valenciennes, 1836) Combined 38 38 13.1 25.2 −1.904 2.977 0.954 0.109 0.550
Male 13 13.9 16.0 −1.894 2.957 0.936 0.234
Female 15 14.2 25.2 −1.688 2.814 0.982 0.106
Liza parsia (Hamilton,1822) Combined 14 14 14.2 23.5 −1.779 2.882 0.975 0.135
Liza subviridis (Valenciennes, 1836) Combined 962 334 6.6 28.6 −1.514 2.647 0.961 0.029 0.082
Male 14 12.8 28.6 −1.780 2.889 0.980 0.120
Female 57 9.7 27.8 −2.101 3.156 0.976 0.066
Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758 Combined 208 208 4.8 47.3 −1.878 2.929 0.957 0.043 0.460
Male 39 20.3 31.5 −2.113 3.098 0.977 0.078
Female 29 20.7 47.2 −1.978 3.014 0.981 0.082
Valamugil cunnesius (Valenciennes, 1836) Combined 473 370 12.3 26.7 −1.939 2.965 0.909 0.049 0.425
Male 70 14.0 17.5 −1.704 2.775 0.865 0.133
Female 238 13.6 25.5 −1.856 2.899 0.871 0.073
Platycephalidae Platycephalus indicus (Linnaeus, 1758) Combined 19 19 13.0 48.0 −1.756 2.736 0.984 0.086
Carangidae Alepes djedaba (Forsskål, 1775) Combined 57 55 8.0 21.5 −2.258 3.220 0.969 0.079
Caranx sexfasciatus Quoy & Gaimard, 1825 Combined 37 37 10.6 21.4 −1.929 3.041 0.984 0.066
Scomberoides commersonnianus (Lacepède, 1801) Combined 174 174 11.4 36.0 −2.249 3.105 0.985 0.029
Trachinotus mookalee Cuvier, 1832 Combined 16 16 10.2 32.4 −1.663 2.871 0.991 0.073
Leiognathidae Nuchequula blochii (Valenciennes, 1835) Combined 118 68 6.8 9.0 −2.035 3.212 0.842 0.171
Leiognathus equulus (Forsskål, 1775) Combined 12 12 7.8 13.0 −1.989 3.210 0.985 0.123
Secutor insidiator (Bloch, 1787) Combined 65 63 7.4 11.6 −2.669 3.823 0.895 0.168
Gerreidae Gerres filamentosus Cuvier, 1829 Combined 52 52 9.2 18.7 −1.849 2.989 0.968 0.077
Female 22 10.2 18.6 −1.728 2.883 0.950 0.148
Gerres limbatus (Cuvier, 1830) Combined 24 24 7.3 13.0 −1.830 2.992 0.909 0.201
Haemulidae Pomadasys kaakan (Cuvier, 1830) Combined 101 101 9.8 22.0 −1.776 2.985 0.976 0.047
Sparidae Acanthopagrus berda (Forsskål, 1775) Combined 21 21 10.8 36.7 −1.822 3.092 0.985 0.087
Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn, 1782) Combined 43 43 12.6 29.3 −1.710 3.015 0.965 0.089
Rhabdosargus sarba (Forsskål, 1775) Combined 58 56 8.8 23.5 −1.712 2.954 0.971 0.070
Female 33 12.9 18.1 −1.676 2.923 0.872 0.201
Sciaenidae Johnius dussumieri (Cuvier, 1830) Combined 30 30 8.4 17.6 −2.079 3.097 0.960 0.120
Female 20 11.5 17.6 −1.807 2.856 0.911 0.210
Terapontidae Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) Combined 242 242 10.5 19.3 −1.914 3.091 0.969 0.035
Male 14 11.1 17.7 −1.981 3.162 0.954 0.200
Gobiidae Psammogobius biocellatus (Valenciennes, 1837) Combined 17 17 10.0 19.8 −1.747 2.752 0.948 0.166
Scatophagidae Scatophagus argus (Linnaeus, 1766) Combined* 709 697 5.5 45.0 −1.297 2.854 0.982 0.015 0.001
Male 192 9.0 24.1 −1.199 2.764 0.955 0.044
Female 464 9.1 45.0 −1.296 2.856 0.973 0.022
Sphyraenidae Sphyraena forsteri Cuvier, 1829 Combined 20 19 26.3 54.0 −5.460 3.036 0.988 0.082
Scombridae Scomberomorus guttatus (Bloch & Schneider,1801) Combined 13 13 16.2 39.0 −2.010 2.872 0.991 0.084
Paralichthyidae Pseudorhombus arsius (Hamilton, 1822) Combined 16 16 11.4 23.6 −2.676 3.535 0.975 0.152
Soleidae Brachirus orientalis (Bloch & Schneider,1801) Combined 10 10 12.3 20.8 −1.789 3.027 0.986 0.128
Synaptura commersonnii (Lacepède, 1802) Combined 10 10 12.9 36.0 −1.876 3.075 0.995 0.078
  • Combined totals include unsexed individuals used for parameter estimation after outliers were removed; sb, standard error estimate of the slope b.
  • *Significant differences (P< 0.05) between males and females. Names in bold = first reports of length–weight parameters; estimates of b in bold = not significantly (P > 0.05) different from three.

The coefficient of determination (r2) of the length–weight relationships ranged from 0.723 for Liza carinata to 0.995 for S. commersonnii, all models were significant and r2 values were > 0.90 for 35 species (sexes pooled). The estimated b values ranged from a minimum of 2.204 for L. carinata to a maximum of 3.535 for Pseudorhombus arsius. Fourteen species included enough sexed individuals to be able to conduct sex-specific length–weight regressions (Table 1). Two species (N. nasus and Scatophagus argus) were found to have differences in the sex-specific b-value. In both species, males had a significantly lower b value (2.609 and 2.764, respectively) than females. There were 16 species that showed isometric growth (b =3) with estimated b-values not significantly (P>0.05) different from three. Eight species showed positive allometric growth (b > 3) and 17 species showed negative allometric growth (b <3).

The length–weight relationship was relatively ‘weak’ for several species (Thryssa dussimieri, H. kelee, N. nasus, S. gibbosa, Sardinella sindensis, and L. carinata), with r2 ranging from 0.680 to 0.866 (Table 1). The low r2 may be the result of several factors such as gut fullness or maturity stage (T. dussimieri, H. kelee, N. nasus, S. gibbosa, and L. carinata) and low sample size (S. sindensis). The influence of season, habitat, ontogenetic changes, sex, gonad maturity, diet, stomach fullness and health on length–weight relationships has been identified in many studies (Richter et al., 2000; Moutopoulos and Stergiou, 2002; Frota et al., 2004, among others). Although the estimations of the length–weight relationship did not take these factors into account, except for the sex when available, these data represent important baseline data needed for management of the fisheries in the region.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Pakistan Science Foundation Islamabad project number S-KU/BIO(319). We thank Dr. R. E. Matheson of the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission for providing useful comments on the taxonomic classification of the families described in the manuscript. We thankfully acknowledge the Director of the Centre of Excellence in Marine Biology, University of Karachi, for his cooperation.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.