The effect of migration on income growth and convergence: Meta-analytic evidence
Ceren Ozgen
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] )
Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 55th Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International (RSAI), 20–22 November 2008, Brooklyn, New York; the Workshop on Creative, Intellectual and Entrepreneurial Resources for Regional Development, 15–16 June 2009, Tinbergen Institute & VU University, Amsterdam; the Workshop on Determinants and Effects of Interregional Mobility, 1–3 October 2009, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy; and the 46th Annual Meeting of the Japan Section of RSAI, 10–12 October 2009, Hiroshima, Japan. We thank Bernard Fingleton, Geoffrey Hewings, Mario Larch, Yasuhide Okuyama and three anonymous referees for useful comments. We are grateful to Etsuro Shioji and Sari Pekkala Kerr for providing additional primary study results.
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Nijkamp
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] )
Search for more papers by this authorJacques Poot
Population Studies Centre, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand (e-mail: [email protected] )
Search for more papers by this authorCeren Ozgen
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] )
Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 55th Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International (RSAI), 20–22 November 2008, Brooklyn, New York; the Workshop on Creative, Intellectual and Entrepreneurial Resources for Regional Development, 15–16 June 2009, Tinbergen Institute & VU University, Amsterdam; the Workshop on Determinants and Effects of Interregional Mobility, 1–3 October 2009, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy; and the 46th Annual Meeting of the Japan Section of RSAI, 10–12 October 2009, Hiroshima, Japan. We thank Bernard Fingleton, Geoffrey Hewings, Mario Larch, Yasuhide Okuyama and three anonymous referees for useful comments. We are grateful to Etsuro Shioji and Sari Pekkala Kerr for providing additional primary study results.
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Nijkamp
Department of Spatial Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] )
Search for more papers by this authorJacques Poot
Population Studies Centre, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand (e-mail: [email protected] )
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We compare a set of econometric studies that measure the effect of net internal migration in neoclassical models of long-run real income convergence and derive 67 comparable effect sizes. The precision-weighted estimate of beta convergence is about 2.7 per cent. An increase of one percentage point in the net migration rate of a region increases the per capita income growth rate in that region on average by about 0.1 percentage points. Introducing a net migration variable in a growth regression increases the estimate of beta convergence slightly. Studies that use panel models or IV estimation methods yield smaller coefficients of net migration in growth regressions, while the opposite holds for regressions controlling for high-skilled migration.
Resumen
Comparamos un conjunto de estudios econométricos que miden el efecto de la migración interna neta en modelos neoclásicos de convergencia de ingresos reales a largo plazo y de ahí obtenemos 67 tamaños de efectos comparables. La estimación ponderada por precisión de la beta-convergencia es aproximadamente del 2.7 por ciento. Un aumento de un punto porcentual en la tasa de migración neta de una región aumenta la tasa de crecimiento de ingresos per cápita en dicha región en un promedio de aproximadamente 0.1 puntos porcentuales. El introducir una variable de migración neta en una regresión de crecimiento aumenta ligeramente el valor estimado de beta-convergencia. Los estudios que usan modelos de panel o métodos de estimación por VI producen coeficientes menores de migración neta en regresiones de crecimiento, mientras que sucede lo contrario para regresiones que controlan migración altamente cualificada.
References
-
Abreu M,
Florax RJGM,
De Groot HLF (2005) A meta-analysis of beta-convergence: The legendary 2-percent.
Journal of Economic Surveys
19: 389–420
10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00253.x Google Scholar
- Barro RJ, Sala-i Martin X (1992) Regional growth and migration: A Japan-United States comparison. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 6: 312–346
- Barro RJ, Sala-i Martin X (2004) Economic growth. 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge
-
Begg CB (1994) Publication bias. In: H Cooper,
LV Hedges (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.030 Google Scholar
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis, electronic book, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester
-
Borjas J (1999). The economic analysis of immigration. In: O Ashenfelter,
D Card (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North Holland, Amsterdam
10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03009-6 Google Scholar
- Cardenas M, Ponton A (1995) Growth and convergence in Colombia: 1950–1990. Journal of Development Economics 47: 5–37
- Cashin P, Loayza N (1995) Paradise lost? Growth, convergence and migration in the South Pacific. IMF, working paper WP/95/28
-
Cass D (1965) Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation.
Review of Economic Studies
37: 233–240
10.2307/2295827 Google Scholar
- Cochran WG (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common X2 tests. Biometrics 10: 417–451
- Cushing B, Poot J (2004) Crossing boundaries and borders: Regional science advances in migration modelling. Papers in Regional Science 83: 317–338
- Dobson S, Ramlogan C, Strobl E (2006) Why do rates of β-convergence differ? A meta-regression analysis. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 53: 153–173
- Dominicis de L, Florax RJGM, De Groot HLF (2008) A meta-analysis on the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 55: 654–682
- Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN (1997a) Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures. British Medical Journal 315: 1533–1537
-
Egger M,
Smith GD,
Scheider M,
Minder C (1997b) Bias in meta-analysis detected by simple graphical test.
British Medical Journal, 316: 629–634
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 Google Scholar
-
Engels EA,
Schmid CH,
Terinn N,
Olkin I,
Lau J (2000) Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: An empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.
Statistics in Medicine
19: 1707–1728
10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::AID-SIM491>3.0.CO;2-P CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Etzo I (2008) Internal migration: A review of the literature. MPRA Paper No.8783
- Fingleton B, Fischer MM (2010) Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development. Annals of Regional Science 44: 467–491
-
Fratesi U,
Riggi RM (2007) Does migration reduce regional disparities? The role of skill-selective flows.
Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies
19: 78–102
10.1111/j.1467-940X.2007.00125.x Google Scholar
-
Fujita M,
Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
10.1017/CBO9780511805660 Google Scholar
- Gallup JL, Sachs JD, Mellinger AD (1999) Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review 22: 179–232
-
Gezici F,
Hewings GJD (2004) Regional convergence and the economic performance of peripheral areas in Turkey.
Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies
16: 113–132
10.1111/j.1467-940X.2004.00082.x Google Scholar
- Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126–1151
- Greenwood MJ (1975) Research on international migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13: 397–433
- Greenwood MJ, Hunt GL (1989) Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration. Journal of Urban Economics 25: 1–16
- Hamermesh DS (2007) Replication in economics. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion paper 2760, Bonn
- Hedges LV (1994) Fixed effects models. In: H Cooper, LV Hedges (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
- Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press Inc, Orlando
- Huedo-Medina T, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J (2006) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q-statistic or I2 index? Center for Health, Intervention, and Prevention, CHIP Documents, University of Connecticut, USA. URL: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/chipdocs/19. Visited on 15 December 2008
- Islam N (2003) What have we learnt from the convergence debate? Journal of Economic Surveys 17: 309–362
- Kanbur R, Rapoport H (2005) Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. Journal of Economic Geography 5: 43–57
- Kırdar MG, Saraçoğlu DS (2008) Migration and regional convergence: An empirical investigation for Turkey. Papers in Regional Science 87: 545–566
- Koetse MJ, Florax RJGM, De Groot HLF (2007) The impact of effect size heterogeneity on meta-analysis: A Monte Carlo experiment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2007-052/3, Amsterdam
- Koopmans TC (1965) On the concept of optimal economic growth. Cowles Foundation Paper 238, Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia, Yale University
- Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (2001) Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research method series, Vol. 49, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
-
Maza A (2006) Migrations and regional convergence: The case of Spain.
Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft
26: 191–202
10.1007/s10037-006-0009-9 Google Scholar
- McCann P (2001) Urban and regional economics. Oxford Publishing, Oxford
- Molho I (1986) Theories of migration: A review. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 33: 396–419
- Nelson JP, Kennedy PE (2009) The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics 42: 345–377
- Nijkamp P (2009) Regional development as self-organized converging growth. In: G Kochendorfer-Lucius, B Pleskovic (eds). Spatial disparities and development policy. World Bank, Washington DC
- Nijkamp P, Poot J (2005) The last word on the wage curve? Journal of Economic Surveys 19: 421–450
- Nijkamp P, Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Annals of Regional Science 32: 7–37
- Ostbye S, Westerlund O (2007) Is migration important for regional convergence? Comparative evidence for Norwegian and Swedish counties, 1980–2000. Regional Studies 41: 901–915
- Peeters L (2008) Selective in-migration and income convergence and divergence across Belgian municipalities. Regional Studies 42: 905–921
- Pekkala S, Kangasharju A (2001) The effect of migration on regional convergence: Short-run versus long-run. Unpublished working paper (Requested from the authors)
- Persson J (1997) Convergence across the Swedish counties, 1911–1993. European Economic Review, 41: 1835–1852
- Pissarides CA, McMaster I (1990) Regional migration, wages and unemployment: Empirical evidence and implications for policy. Oxford Economic Papers 42: 812–831
- Polese M (1981) Regional disparity, migration and economic adjustment: A reappraisal. Canadian Public Policy VII: 519–525
-
Poot J (2008) Demographic change and regional competitiveness: The effects of immigration and ageing.
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
4: 129–145
10.1504/IJFIP.2008.016910 Google Scholar
- Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559
- Raudenbush WS (1994) Random effects models. In: H Cooper, LV Hedges (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
- Rappaport J (2005) How does labor mobility affect income convergence? Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 29: 567–581
- Reichlin P, Rustichini A (1998) Diverging patterns with endogenous labour migration. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22: 703–728
- Rosenthal R, DiMatteo MR (2001) Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review Psychology 52: 59–82
- Shadish WR, Haddock CK (1994) Combining estimates of effect size. In: H Cooper, LV Hedges (eds) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
- Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94
- Shioji E (2001) Composition effect of migration and regional growth in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 15: 29–49
- Soto R, Torche A (2004) Spatial inequality, migration, and economic growth in Chile. Cuadernos De Economía 41: 401–424
- Stanley TD (2001) Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 131–150
- Sterne JAC (ed) (2009) Meta-analysis in Stata: An updated collection from the Stata Journal. Stata Press, College Station, TX
-
Stouffer SA (1940) Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance.
American Sociological Review
5: 845–867
10.2307/2084520 Google Scholar
- Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F (2000). Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
-
Thompson SG,
Sharp SJ (1999) Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods.
Statistics in Medicine
18: 2693–2708
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2693::AID-SIM235>3.0.CO;2-V CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Toya H, Hosono K, Makino T (2004) Human capital, migration, and regional income convergence in the Philippines. Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University (Tokyo) Discussion Paper Series, No.18
- UN (2009) World population prospects: The 2008 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, ESA/P/WP.210
- UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007, unleashing the potential of urban growth. United Nations Population Fund, New York
- Verbeek M (2004) A guide to modern econometrics. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester
- Williamson JG (1991) Inequality, poverty, and history. Blackwell, Oxford
-
World Bank (2008) World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. World Bank Group, Washington DC
10.1596/978-0-8213-7607-2 Google Scholar
- Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368