Volume 26, Issue 1 pp. E71-E77

Institution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation late after lung transplantation – a futile exercise?

Silvana F. Marasco

Silvana F. Marasco

Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital

Department of Surgery, Monash University

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Vale

Matthew Vale

Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Arthur Preovolos

Arthur Preovolos

Department of Perfusion, The Alfred Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Vince Pellegrino

Vince Pellegrino

Intensive Care Unit, The Alfred Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Geraldine Lee

Geraldine Lee

Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit, The Alfred Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Greg Snell

Greg Snell

Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Trevor Williams

Trevor Williams

Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 December 2011
Citations: 22
Corresponding author: Dr. Silvana Marasco, MBBS (Hons), MS, FRACS, Cardiothoracic Surgeon, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3181, Australia.
Tel.: +61 3 9076 2558; fax: +61 3 9076 2317; e-mail: [email protected]

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Abstract

Marasco SF, Vale M, Preovolos A, Pellegrino V, Lee G, Snell G, Williams T. Institution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation late after lung transplantation – a futile exercise?
Clin Transplant 2012: 26: E71–E77.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Abstract: The use of and indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are expanding as its reliability improves with widely varying results reported. A retrospective review of 24 lung transplant recipients who required ECMO support postoperatively was performed with 13 patients requiring ECMO within the first 48 h (“early” group) and 11 requiring ECMO after seven d postoperatively (“late” group). The majority of early ECMO group had primary graft failure patients and the late ECMO group comprised patients with infection or non-specific graft failure. There were significant differences in outcomes between groups, with 10/13 in the early group and 4/11 in the late group successfully weaned from ECMO (p = 0.045). Six of the 13 patients in the early group and none of the late group survived to hospital discharge (p = 0.009). The late ECMO group had a much higher incidence of death owing to complications existing prior to institution of ECMO (essentially uncontrolled infection or organ failure). There were no differences in complications arising during ECMO between groups. Late institution of ECMO in lung transplant recipients for causes other than primary graft failure is associated with such poor survival that its use should be considered only in very select cases.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.