Volume 17, Issue 6 pp. 776-783
Original Article

Effect of intervention on decision making of treatment for disease progression, prostate-specific antigen biochemical failure and prostate cancer death

Rex C.-C. Huang MS

Rex C.-C. Huang MS

PhD Student

PhD Student, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Anssi Auvinen PhD

Anssi Auvinen PhD

Professor of Epidemiology

Professor of Epidemiology, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Matti Hakama PhD

Matti Hakama PhD

Professor of Epidemiology

Professor of Epidemiology, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Professor of Epidemiology, Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Teuvo L. J. Tammela PhD

Teuvo L. J. Tammela PhD

Professor of Urology

Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Martti Ala-Opas PhD

Martti Ala-Opas PhD

Professor of Urology

Professor of Urology, Department of Urology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Mikael Leppilahti PhD

Mikael Leppilahti PhD

Professor of Surgery

Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Timo Vornanen MD

Timo Vornanen MD

Professor of Surgery

Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Hsiu-Hsi Chen PhD

Corresponding Author

Hsiu-Hsi Chen PhD

Professor of Biostatistics

Professor of Biostatistics, Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Professor of Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence

Hsiu-Hsi Chen PhD

Division of Biostatistics

Graudate Institite of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine

College of Public Health

National Taiwan University

Room 533, No. 17, Hsuchow Road

Taipei

Taiwan

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 July 2012
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background

Patient preference for the choice of treatment modality for prostate cancer has increasingly gained attention.

Objective

To assess the impact of client-oriented decision on long-term mortality, disease progression and biochemical failure compared with standard treatment protocol (TP).

Methods

With data from a Finnish multicentre, randomized controlled trial with two arms [104 in the enhanced patient participation (EPP) arm and 106 in the TP arm], disease-specific and disease-free survival, biochemical failure with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and disease progression were compared between the two arms using Wilcoxon test and also Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Patients in the EPP arm had a higher risk of death by 37% [HR, 1.37 (0.87–2.17)] compared with those in the TP arm. Patients in the EPP arm were at increased risk of having biochemical failure by 14% [HR, 1.14 (0.72–1.79)] and for having disease progression by 2% [HR, 1.02 (0.61–1.70)] compared with those in the TP arm. All the differences were non-significant.

Conclusions

Patients actively involved in the choice of treatment had higher risk of prostate cancer death but only slightly increased risk of biochemical failure and clinical disease progression. These findings would provide a good reference when patient autonomy for the choice of treatment modality is addressed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.