Volume 17, Issue 3 pp. 365-375

Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for research: Qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project

Michelle A. Banfield PhD

Michelle A. Banfield PhD

Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, The Australian National University

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa J. Barney PhD

Lisa J. Barney PhD

Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kathleen M. Griffiths PhD

Kathleen M. Griffiths PhD

Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Helen M. Christensen PhD

Helen M. Christensen PhD

Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 January 2012
Citations: 29
Dr Michelle Banfield
Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute
Level 1, Ian Potter House
Corner of Marcus Clarke and Gordon Streets
The Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200
Australia
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background There is growing acceptance of the importance of the consumer viewpoint in mental health research. Previous studies have identified differences in research priorities between researchers and mental health consumers in Australia defined broadly. However, little is known about the research priorities of consumers with specific mental health conditions.

Objective The aim of this study was to explore Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for depression and bipolar disorder research.

Design Focus groups with consumers and individual telephone interviews with consumer advocates. Participants were asked to discuss the topics they believed were priorities for depression or bipolar disorder research. Transcripts were thematically analysed using NVivo 7.

Setting and Participants Ten people with depression and 19 with bipolar disorder participated in face-to-face focus groups held in three Australian capital cities. Five participants with each disorder participated in online focus groups. Five Australian consumer advocates with experience of depression and six with experience of bipolar disorder were individually interviewed by telephone.

Results Participants raised a broad variety of topics for research. The most salient themes included the need for research on medication, and lifestyle and psychosocial influences on depression and bipolar disorder.

Conclusions Participants’ priorities reflect an interest in a holistic approach to mental health research that examines the influences of everyday life and psychosocial influences both on the development and on the management of these disorders. Their focus was on research that explores individualized care and the active role that consumers can play in their own care and recovery.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.