Volume 421, Issue 3 pp. 2692-2712

The origin of the early-time optical emission of Swift GRB 080310

O. M. Littlejohns

Corresponding Author

O. M. Littlejohns

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Based on observations made also with ESO telescopes at the La Silla and Paranal Observatory under programme IDs 080.D-0250 and 080.D-0791.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
R. Willingale

R. Willingale

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
P. T. O’Brien

P. T. O’Brien

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
A. P. Beardmore

A. P. Beardmore

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
S. Covino

S. Covino

INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Emilio Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
D. A. Perley

D. A. Perley

Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Search for more papers by this author
N. R. Tanvir

N. R. Tanvir

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
E. Rol

E. Rol

Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, PO Box 94248, NL-1090 SJ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
F. Yuan

F. Yuan

Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Cotter Road, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
C. Akerlof

C. Akerlof

Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Search for more papers by this author
P. D’Avanzo

P. D’Avanzo

INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Emilio Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
D. F. Bersier

D. F. Bersier

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
A. J. Castro-Tirado

A. J. Castro-Tirado

Instituto de Astrofisica de Andaluca (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 03004, E-18008, Granada, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
P. Christian

P. Christian

Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Search for more papers by this author
B. E. Cobb

B. E. Cobb

Department of Physics, The George Washington University, Corcoran 105, 725 21st St, NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA

Search for more papers by this author
P. A. Evans

P. A. Evans

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
A. V. Filippenko

A. V. Filippenko

Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Search for more papers by this author
H. Flewelling

H. Flewelling

Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Search for more papers by this author
D. Fugazza

D. Fugazza

INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Emilio Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
E. A. Hoversten

E. A. Hoversten

Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA

Search for more papers by this author
A. P. Kamble

A. P. Kamble

Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, PO Box 94248, NL-1090 SJ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
S. Kobayashi

S. Kobayashi

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
W. Li

W. Li

Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Search for more papers by this author
A. N. Morgan

A. N. Morgan

Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Search for more papers by this author
C. G. Mundell

C. G. Mundell

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
K. Page

K. Page

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
E. Palazzi

E. Palazzi

INAF – IASF di Bologna, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
R. M. Quimby

R. M. Quimby

Cahill Center for Astrophysics 249-17, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
S. Schulze

S. Schulze

Centre for Astrophysics and Cosmology, Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhagi 5, 107 Reykjavk, Iceland

Search for more papers by this author
I. A. Steele

I. A. Steele

Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
A. de Ugarte Postigo

A. de Ugarte Postigo

Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 February 2012

ABSTRACT

We present broad-band multiwavelength observations of GRB 080310 at redshift z= 2.43. This burst was bright and long-lived, and unusual in having extensive optical and near-infrared (IR) follow-up during the prompt phase. Using these data we attempt to simultaneously model the gamma-ray, X-ray, optical and IR emission using a series of prompt pulses and an afterglow component. Initial attempts to extrapolate the high-energy model directly to lower energies for each pulse reveal that a spectral break is required between the optical regime and 0.3 keV to avoid overpredicting the optical flux. We demonstrate that afterglow emission alone is insufficient to describe all morphology seen in the optical and IR data. Allowing the prompt component to dominate the early-time optical and IR and permitting each pulse to have an independent low-energy spectral indices we produce an alternative scenario which better describes the optical light curve. This, however, does not describe the spectral shape of GRB 080310 at early times. The fit statistics for the prompt- and afterglow-dominated models are nearly identical making it difficult to favour either. However one enduring result is that both models require a low-energy spectral index consistent with self-absorption for at least some of the pulses identified in the high-energy emission model.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.