Volume 376, Issue 1 pp. 13-38

The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses

Richard Massey

Corresponding Author

Richard Massey

California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Heymans

Catherine Heymans

University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Joel Bergé

Joel Bergé

Service d'Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France

Search for more papers by this author
Gary Bernstein

Gary Bernstein

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Bridle

Sarah Bridle

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas Clowe

Douglas Clowe

Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tuscon, AZ 85721, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Håkon Dahle

Håkon Dahle

Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1029, Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Ellis

Richard Ellis

California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Erben

Thomas Erben

Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Hetterscheidt

Marco Hetterscheidt

Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
F. William High

F. William High

California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Department of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 01238, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Hirata

Christopher Hirata

Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Henk Hoekstra

Henk Hoekstra

University of Victoria, Elliott Building, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick Hudelot

Patrick Hudelot

Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, UMR5572, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31000 Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Mike Jarvis

Mike Jarvis

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Johnston

David Johnston

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Konrad Kuijken

Konrad Kuijken

Leiden Observatory, PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA, Leiden, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Vera Margoniner

Vera Margoniner

Department of Physics, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rachel Mandelbaum

Rachel Mandelbaum

Department of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yannick Mellier

Yannick Mellier

Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie - Paris, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France

Observatoire de Paris - LERMA, 61 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Reiko Nakajima

Reiko Nakajima

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephane Paulin-Henriksson

Stephane Paulin-Henriksson

INAF/Catania Astrophysical Observatory, via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Molly Peeples

Molly Peeples

California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 W. 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Roat

Chris Roat

Department of Physics, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre Refregier

Alexandre Refregier

Service d'Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jason Rhodes

Jason Rhodes

California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Schrabback

Tim Schrabback

Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Mischa Schirmer

Mischa Schirmer

Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Calle Alvarez Abreu 70, 38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Uroš Seljak

Uroš Seljak

Department of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elisabetta Semboloni

Elisabetta Semboloni

University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada

Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie - Paris, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Ludovic Van Waerbeke

Ludovic Van Waerbeke

University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2007
Citations: 55

ABSTRACT

The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of weak-lensing measurement, in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. We review 16 current and emerging shear-measurement methods in a common language, and assess their performance by running them (blindly) on simulated images that contain a known shear signal. We determine the common features of algorithms that most successfully recover the input parameters. A desirable goal would be the combination of their best elements into one ultimate shear-measurement method. In this analysis, we achieve previously unattained discriminatory precision via a combination of more extensive simulations and pairs of galaxy images that have been rotated with respect to each other. That removes the otherwise overwhelming noise from their intrinsic ellipticities. Finally, the robustness of our simulation approach is confirmed by testing the relative calibration of methods on real data.

Weak-lensing measurements have improved since the first STEP paper. Several methods now consistently achieve better than 2 per cent precision, and are still being developed. However, we can now distinguish all methods from perfect performance. Our main concern continues to be the potential for a multiplicative shear calibration bias: not least because this cannot be internally calibrated with real data. We determine which galaxy populations are responsible for bias and, by adjusting the simulated observing conditions, we also investigate the effects of instrumental and atmospheric parameters. The simulated point spread functions are not allowed to vary spatially, to avoid additional confusion from interpolation errors. We have isolated several previously unrecognized aspects of galaxy shape measurement, in which focused development could provide further progress towards the sub-per cent level of precision desired for future surveys. These areas include the suitable treatment of image pixellization and galaxy morphology evolution. Ignoring the former effect affects the measurement of shear in different directions, leading to an overall underestimation of shear and hence the amplitude of the matter power spectrum. Ignoring the second effect could affect the calibration of shear estimators as a function of galaxy redshift, and the evolution of the lensing signal, which will be vital to measure parameters including the dark energy equation of state.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.