Volume 19, Issue 5 pp. 753-762
Original Article

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of chronic care management for diabetes: investigating heterogeneity in outcomes

Arianne M. J. Elissen MSc

Corresponding Author

Arianne M. J. Elissen MSc

PhD Student/Researcher, Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Ms Arianne M.J. Elissen, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Lotte M. G. Steuten PhD

Lotte M. G. Steuten PhD

Senior Researcher, Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Lidwien C. Lemmens PhD

Lidwien C. Lemmens PhD

Senior Researcher

Search for more papers by this author
Hanneke W. Drewes MSc

Hanneke W. Drewes MSc

PhD Student/Researcher

PhD Student/Researcher

Search for more papers by this author
Karin M. M. Lemmens PhD

Karin M. M. Lemmens PhD

Senior Researcher, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen MSc

Jolanda A. C. Meeuwissen MSc

Senior Researcher, Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline A. Baan PhD

Caroline A. Baan PhD

Senior Researcher, Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef PhD

Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef PhD

Professor, Department of Integrated Care, TRANZO, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 February 2012
Citations: 67

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to support decision making on how best to redesign diabetes care by investigating three potential sources of heterogeneity in effectiveness across trials of diabetes care management.

Methods Medline, CINAHL and PsycInfo were searched for systematic reviews and empirical studies focusing on: (1) diabetes mellitus; (2) adult patients; and (3) interventions consisting of at least two components of the chronic care model (CCM). Systematic reviews were analysed descriptively; empirical studies were meta-analysed. Pooled effect measures were estimated using a meta-regression model that incorporated study quality, length of follow-up and number of intervention components as potential predictors of heterogeneity in effects.

Results Overall, reviews (n = 15) of diabetes care programmes report modest improvements in glycaemic control. Empirical studies (n = 61) show wide-ranging results on HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and guideline adherence. Differences between studies in methodological quality cannot explain this heterogeneity in effects. Variety in length of follow-up can explain (part of) the variability, yet not across all outcomes. Diversity in the number of included intervention components can explain 8–12% of the heterogeneity in effects on HbA1c and systolic blood pressure.

Conclusions The outcomes of chronic care management for diabetes are generally positive, yet differ considerably across trials. The most promising results are attained in studies with limited follow-up (<1 year) and by programmes including more than two CCM components. These factors can, however, explain only part of the heterogeneity in effectiveness between studies. Other potential sources of heterogeneity should be investigated to ensure implementation of evidence-based improvements in diabetes care.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.