Volume 4, Issue 2 pp. 131-139

Issues of cost and quality: barriers to an informed debate

Caryl E. Carpenter PhD

Corresponding Author

Caryl E. Carpenter PhD

Associate Professor, Widener University, Chester, PA, USA

Health & Medical Services Administration Widener University 1 University Race Chester PA 19013 USASearch for more papers by this author
John M. Cornman

John M. Cornman

Consultants on Purpose, Arlington, VA USA

Search for more papers by this author
A. Douglas Bender PhD

A. Douglas Bender PhD

Associate Professor, Widener University, Chester, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David B. Nash MD MBA

David B. Nash MD MBA

Associate Dean, Office of Health Policy and Clinical Outcomes, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Debates over health reform in the United States are hampered by a poorly informed public and misunderstandings about the concepts of quality, cost containment and their relationship to each other. This paper explores the nature and persistence of barriers to an informed public discussion of reform proposals. Those barriers are: (1) multiple definitions of quality, cost and cost containment, (2) the impact of the media on those definitions, (3) a false assumption that cost containment automatically results in diminished quality, and (4) the perceived impact of managed care and for-profit health firms on that assumption. We suggest a framework for building the understanding and knowledge base necessary to a reform of the nation's health care system.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.