Interspecific pairwise relationships among body size, clutch size and latitude: deconstructing a macroecological triangle in birds
Corresponding Author
Alison G. Boyer
Correspondence and present address: Alison G. Boyer, Ecology, Behavior and Evolution Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0116, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorJean-Luc E. Cartron
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJames H. Brown
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alison G. Boyer
Correspondence and present address: Alison G. Boyer, Ecology, Behavior and Evolution Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0116, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorJean-Luc E. Cartron
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJames H. Brown
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Aim Ecogeographical ‘rules’, large-scale patterns in ecological variables across geographical space, can provide important insights into the mechanisms of evolution and ecological assembly. However, interactions between rules could obscure both the observation of large-scale patterns and their interpretation. Here, we examine a system of three variables interrelated by ecogeographical rules – the latitudinal increase in body size within closely related homeotherms (Bergmann’s rule), the negative allometry of clutch size (Calder’s rule) and the latitudinal increase in clutch size (Lack’s rule) – in a global dataset of birds.
Location Global.
Methods We used linear regressions and meta-analysis techniques to quantify the three rules across clades and through the taxonomic hierarchy. Path analysis was used to quantify interactions between rules at multiple taxonomic levels, as a function of both phylogenetic inheritance of traits and indirect feedbacks between the three rules. Independent contrasts analyses were performed on four clades with available phylogenies, and the taxonomic partitioning of variation in each trait was quantified.
Results Standardizing across all clades, Lack’s and Bergmann’s rules were supported at all taxonomic levels, with Calder’s rule being supported at the order level. Lack’s rule was consistently stronger and more often detected than the other two rules. Path analysis showed that the indirect effects often outweighed the direct effects of Calder’s rule at the genus level and Bergmann’s rule at the order level. Strong interactions between Calder’s and Bergmann’s rules led to a trade-off between the rules depending on taxonomic resolution.
Main conclusions We found strong interactions between Bergmann’s, Lack’s and Calder’s rules in birds, and these interactions varied in strength and direction over the taxonomic hierarchy and among avian clades. Ecogeographical rules may be masked by feedbacks from other, correlated variables, even when the underlying selective mechanism is operating. The apparently conflicting pairwise relationships among clutch size, body size and latitude illustrate the difficulty of interpreting individual pairwise correlations without recognition of interdependence with other variables.
Supporting Information
Figure S1 Phylogenetic trees used in independent contrasts analysis for (a) Corvidae,(b) Falconidae and (c) Galliformes.
Figure S2 Linear regression results for Bergmann’s rule in birds: log body length versus midpoint of latitudinal range, with species as data points within (a) genera, (b) families and (c) orders.
Figure S3 Linear regression results for Lack’s rule in birds: median clutch size versus midpoint of latitudinal range, with species as data points within (a) genera, (b) families and (c) orders.
Figure S4 Linear regression results for Calder’s rule in birds: median clutch size versus log body length, with species as data points within (a) genera, (b) families and (c) orders.
Appendix S1 Data table and references for clutch size, body length and latitudinal midpoint for all bird species used in the analysis.
Appendix S2 Analysis of the relationship between body length and body mass in birds.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
JBI_2175_sm_Appendix.S1.txt103.3 KB | Supporting info item |
JBI_2175_sm_Appendix.S2.doc82.5 KB | Supporting info item |
JBI_2175_sm_supplementary_figures.pdf7.5 MB | Supporting info item |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Alwin, D.F. & Hauser, R.M. (1975) The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40, 37–47.
- Ar, A. & Yom-Tov, Y. (1978) The evolution of parental care in birds. Evolution, 32, 655–669.
-
Ashmole, N.P. (1963) The regulation of numbers of tropical oceanic birds.
Ibis, 103b, 458–473.
10.1111/j.1474-919X.1963.tb06766.x Google Scholar
- Ashton, K.G. (2002) Patterns of within-species body size variation of birds: strong evidence for Bergmann’s rule. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 505–523.
-
Bennett, P.M. &
Owens, I.P.F. (2002) Evolutionary ecology of birds. Oxford University Press, New York.
10.1093/oso/9780198510888.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Bergmann, C. (1847) Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmekönomie der Tiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien, 1, 595–708.
- Binder, P.M. (2008) Frustration in complexity. Science, 320, 322–323.
- Blackburn, T.M. & Gaston, K.J. (1996) Spatial patterns in the body sizes of bird species in the New World. Oikos, 77, 436–446.
-
Blackburn, T.M.,
Gaston, K.J. &
Loder, N. (1999) Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule.
Diversity and Distributions, 5, 165–174.
10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00046.x Google Scholar
- Brown, J.H. & Sibly, R.M. (2006) Life-history evolution under a production constraint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 17595–17599.
-
Brown, J.H.,
Bedrick, E.J.,
Ernest, S.K.M.,
Cartron, J.-L.E. &
Kelly, J.F. (2004) Constraints on negative relationships: mathematical causes and ecological consequences.
The nature of scientific evidence (ed. by
M. Taper and
S. Lele), pp. 298–308. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10.7208/chicago/9780226789583.003.0010 Google Scholar
- Buehler, D.A. (2000) Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). The birds of North America online (ed. by A. Poole). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/506/ (accessed 21 April 2009).
- Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Calder, W.A., III (1984) Size, function, and life history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Cardillo, M. (2002) Body size and latitudinal gradients in regional diversity of New World birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 59–65.
- Cartron, J.-L.E., Kelly, J.F. & Brown, J.H. (2000) Constraints on patterns of covariation: a case study in strigid owls. Oikos, 90, 381–389.
- Charnov, E.L. (2001) Evolution of mammal life histories. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 521–535.
- Charnov, E.L. & Ernest, S.K.M. (2006) The offspring-size/clutch-size trade-off in mammals. The American Naturalist, 167, 578–582.
- Clegg, S.M. & Owens, I.P. (2002) The ‘island rule’ in birds: medium body size and its ecological explanation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1359–1365.
- Cody, M.L. (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution, 20, 174–184.
- Covas, R., Brown, C.R., Anderson, M.D. & Brown, M.B. (2002) Stabilizing selection on body mass in the sociable weaver Philetairus socius. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1905–1909.
- Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., Rodriguez, M.A., Rangel, T.F. & Hawkins, B.A. (2007) Seeing the forest for the trees: partitioning ecological and phylogenetic components of Bergmann’s rule in European Carnivora. Ecography, 30, 598–608.
- Du, W., Ji, X. & Shine, R. (2005) Does body volume constrain reproductive output in lizards? Biology Letters, 1, 98–100.
- Ericson, P.G.P., Jansen, A.-L., Johansson, U.S. & Ekman, J. (2005) Inter-generic relationships of the crows, jays, magpies and allied groups (Aves: Corvidae) based on nucleotide sequence data. Journal of Avian Biology, 36, 222–234.
- Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist, 125, 1–15.
- Figuerola, J. & Green, A.J. (2006) A comparative study of egg mass and clutch size in the Anseriformes. Journal für Ornithologie, 147, 57–68.
- Fitch, H.S. (1970) Reproductive cycles in lizards and snakes. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications, 52, 1–247.
- Garland, T.J., Harvey, P.H. & Ives, A.R. (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology, 41, 18–32.
- Gaston, K.J., Chown, S.L. & Evans, K.L. (2008) Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 483–500.
- Griebeler, E.M. & Böhning-Gaese, K. (2004) Evolution of clutch size along latitudinal gradients: revisiting Ashmole’s hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 679–694.
- Griffiths, C.S. (1999) Phylogeny of the Falconidae inferred from molecular and morphological data. The Auk, 116, 116–130.
- Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
- Holt, R.D. & Slade, N. (2004) Constraints come in many colors. The nature of scientific evidence (ed. by M. Taper and S. Lele), pp. 308–315. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Hussell, D.J.T. (1985) Clutch size, daylength and seasonality of resources: comments on Ashmole’s hypothesis. The Auk, 102, 632–634.
- Jackson, J.A. & Ouellet, H.R. (2002) Downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens). The birds of North America online (ed. by A. Poole). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/613/ (accessed 21 April 2009).
- Jackson, J.A., Ouellet, H.R. & Jackson, B.J.S. (2002) Hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosus). The birds of North America online (ed. by A. Poole). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/702/ (accessed 21 April 2009).
- James, F. (1970) Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology, 51, 365–390.
- Jetz, W., Sekercioglu, C. & Böhning-Gaese, K. (2008) The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. PloS Biology, 6, e303.
-
Johnston, R.F. &
Selander, R.K. (2008) House sparrows rapid evolution of races in North America.
Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature (ed. by
J.M. Marzluff,
E. Shulenberger,
W. Endlicher and
M. Alberti), pp. 315–320. Springer-Verlag, New York.
10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_19 Google Scholar
- Kimball, R.T., Braun, E.L., Zwartjes, P.W., Crowe, T.M. & Ligon, J.D. (1999) A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 11, 38–54.
- Kline, R.B. (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York.
- Klomp, H. (1970) The determination of clutch-size in birds. Ardea, 58, 1–124.
- Koenig, W.D. (1984) Geographic variation in clutch size in the Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus): support for Ashmole’s hypothesis. The Auk, 101, 698–706.
- Kulesza, G. (1990) An analysis of clutch-size in New World passerine birds. Ibis, 132, 407–422.
- Lack, D. (1947) The significance of clutch size. Parts I and II. Ibis, 89, 302–352.
- Lack, D. (1948) The significance of clutch size. Part III. Some interspecific comparisons. Ibis, 90, 25–45.
- Lack, D. (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, London.
- Linstedt, S.L. & Boyce, M.S. (1985) Seasonality, fasting endurance, and body size in mammals. The American Naturalist, 125, 873–878.
- Lomolino, M.V., Sax, D.F., Riddle, B.R. & Brown, J.H. (2006) The island rule and a research agenda for studying ecogeographic patterns. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1503–1510.
- Maddison, W. & Maddison, D. (2008) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.5. Available at: http://www.mesquiteproject.org/ (accessed 25 October 2008).
- Meiri, S. & Dayan, T. (2003) On the validity of Bergmann’s rule. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 331–351.
- Meiri, S. & Thomas, G.H. (2007) The geography of body size – challenges of the interspecific approach. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 689–693.
- Midford, P., Garland, T.J. & Maddison, W. (2008) PDAP: PDTREE: a translation of the PDTREE application of Garland et al.’s phenotypic diversity analysis programs, version 1.13. Available at: http://www.mesquiteproject.org/pdap_mesquite (accessed 25 October 2008).
- Millar, J.S. (1981) Pre-partum reproductive characteristics of eutherian mammals. Evolution, 35, 1149–1163.
- Murphy, E.C. (1985) Bergmann’s rule, seasonality and geographic variation in body size of house sparrows. Evolution, 39, 1327–1334.
- Olson, V.A., Davies, R.G., Orme, C.D.L., Thomas, G.H., Meiri, S., Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Owens, I.P.F. & Bennett, P.M. (2009) Global biogeography and ecology of body size in birds. Ecology Letters, 12, 249–259.
-
Perrins, C.M. (1977) The role of predation in the evolution of clutch size.
Evolutionary ecology (ed. by
B. Stonehouse and
C. Perrins), pp. 181–191. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD.
10.1007/978-1-349-05226-4_16 Google Scholar
- Perrins, C.M. & Moss, D. (1975) Reproductive rates in the great tit. Journal of Animal Ecology, 44, 695–706.
- Peters, R.H. (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.8.1. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 22 December 2008).
- Ramirez, L., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. & Hawkins, B.A. (2008) Partitioning phylogenetic and adaptive components of the geographical body-size pattern of New World birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 100–110.
-
Rensch, B. (1938) Some problems of geographical variation and species-formation.
Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 150, 275–285.
10.1111/j.1095-8312.1938.tb00182k.x Google Scholar
- Ricklefs, R.E. (1980) Geographical variation in clutch size among passerine birds: Ashmole’s hypothesis. The Auk, 97, 38–49.
- Saether, B.-E. (1987) The influence of body weight on the covariation between reproductive traits in European birds. Oikos, 48, 79–88.
- Shine, R. (1988) The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin’s ‘fecundity advantage’ model. The American Naturalist, 131, 124–131.
- Sibly, R.M. & Brown, J.H. (2007) Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 17707–17712.
- Skutch, A.F. (1949) Do tropical birds raise as many young as they can nourish? Ibis, 100, 1–30.
- Slagsvold, T. (1982) Clutch size variation in passerine birds: the nest predation hypothesis. Oecologia, 54, 159–169.
-
Starck, J.M. &
Ricklefs, R.E. (1998) Avian growth and development: evolution within the altricial precocial spectrum. Oxford University Press, New York.
10.1093/oso/9780195106084.001.0001 Google Scholar
-
Weimerskirch, H. (2001) The demography of seabirds and its relationship with the marine environment.
Biology of marine birds (ed. by
E.A. Schreiber and
J. Burger), pp. 115–135. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
10.1201/9781420036305.ch5 Google Scholar
- Williams, G.C. (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. The American Naturalist, 100, 687–690.