Maintaining control over illness: a model of partner activity in prostate cancer
Corresponding Author
V. NANTON ba, msc, phd, research fellow
Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Veronica Nanton, Research Fellow, Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorD. OSBORNE ba, phd, freelance researcher
32 Holbrook Avenue, Rugby
Search for more papers by this authorJ. DALE ba mbbs ma frcgp phd, professor of primary care
Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
V. NANTON ba, msc, phd, research fellow
Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Veronica Nanton, Research Fellow, Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorD. OSBORNE ba, phd, freelance researcher
32 Holbrook Avenue, Rugby
Search for more papers by this authorJ. DALE ba mbbs ma frcgp phd, professor of primary care
Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
NANTON V., OSBORNE D. & DALE J. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 329–339Maintaining control over illness: a model of partner activity in prostate cancer
Prostate cancer demonstrates particular characteristics and potential stresses for both patient and partner, yet its consequences for the couple are often inadequately addressed in the clinical setting. One-to-one interviews have shown areas of partner need but do not address the dynamic of the couple which itself holds implications for clinical practice. The participation of nine out of a possible 15 women in interviews with men taking part in a study of information needs suggested the extent of involvement by partners in prostate cancer. Secondary analysis of the verbal interaction and thematic content of the interviews authenticated the representation by members of the couple of the struggle against cancer as a shared experience. The women were shown to exercise authority, accepted by men in relation to illness-related issues and assumed responsibility for the management of information, care and the continuation of normal day-to-day life. Findings suggest a model of partner activity in prostate cancer conceptualized as ‘maintaining control over illness’. In the clinical setting, attention to the interaction between partners may facilitate appropriate communication strategies by health professionals, leading to more effective information exchange. Encouragement of the attendance and involvement of partners in the planning of care would support their contribution.
REFERENCES
-
Anderson-Wallace M.,
Blantern C. &
Boydell T. (2001) Advances in cross boundary practice: inter-logics as method.
Career Development International
6, 414–420.
10.1108/13620430110405758 Google Scholar
- Arksey H. (1996) Collecting data through joint interviews. Social Research Update 15, University of Surrey.
-
Bakhtin M.M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (Trans. Mcgee, V.W.). University of Texas Press, Austin, MN, USA.
10.7560/720466 Google Scholar
- Banks I. (2001) No man's land: men, illness, and the NHS. British Medical Journal 323, 1058–1060.
- Banthia R., Malcarne V.L., Varni J.W., Ko C.M. & Sadler G.R. (2003) The Effects of Dyadic Strength and Coping Styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 26, 31–51.
- Barnoy S., Bar-Tal Y. & Zisser B. (2006) Correspondence in informational coping styles: how important is it for cancer patients and their spouses? Personality and Individual Differences 41, 105–115.
- Berger P. & Luckman T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday, New York, USA.
- Brown G. (2002) A note on deixis, point of view, and the English verbs: depart and leave. Research Centre for Applied Linguistics Publications. Working papers 8, 61–72.
-
Brown P. &
Levinson S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10.1017/CBO9780511813085 Google Scholar
- Calman K. & Hine D. (1995) A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. A report by the expert advisory group to the Chief Medical Officer. London.
- Carlen P. (1988) Women Crime and Poverty. OUP, London, UK.
- Dale J., Jatsch W., Hughes N., Pearce A. & Meystre C. (2004) Information needs and prostate cancer: the development of a systematic means of identification. British Journal of Urology International 94, 63–69.
- Department of Health (2000) The National Cancer Plan. HMSO, London, UK.
- Drummond N. & Mason C. (1990) Diabetes in a social context, just a different way of life in the age of reason. In: Readings in Medical Sociology (eds. S. Cunningham Burley & N.P. Mc Keganey), pp. 37–54. Routledge, London, UK.
- Edgell S. (1980) Middle Class Couples: A Study of Segregation, Domination and Inequality in Marriage. George Allen and Unwin, London, UK.
- Ezer H., Ricard N. & Bouchard L. (2006) Adaptation of wives to prostate cancer following diagnosis and three months after treatment: a test of family adaptation theory. International Journal of Nursing Studies 43, 827–838.
- Feldman-Stewart D., Brundage M.D., Nickel J.C. & MacKillop W.J. (2001) The information required by patients with early stage prostate cancer. British Journal of Urology International 87, 218–223.
- Fergus K., Grey R., Fitch M.I., Labreque M. & Philips C. (2002) Active Consideration; Conceptualizing patient – provided support for spouse caregivers in the context of prostate cancer. Qualitative Health Research 12, 492–514.
-
Finch J. &
Mason J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. Routledge, London, UK.
10.4324/9780203393208 Google Scholar
- Given B.A., Given R.N., Given C.W., & Kozachik S. (2001) Family support in advanced cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 51, 213–231.
-
Goffman E. (1979) Footing.
Semiotica
25, 1–29. Reprinted in Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 Google Scholar
- Gollins T. (2001) Male carers: a study of the inter-relations between caring, male identity and age. Sheffield Online Papers in Social Research [online]. No.3, April. ISSN: 1470-0689 [Accessed 1 August 2007] Available at: http://www.shef.ac.uk/socstudies/Shop/gollins.pdf
- Gulavita S., Sinnot C., Setliff A.E. & Sellick S.M. (2000) What do men with prostate cancer want to know? Canadian Family Physician 9, 1769–1771.
- Harden J., Schafenacker A., Northouse L. & Mood D. (2002) Couples' experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncology Nursing Forum 29, 701–709.
- Heaton J. (1998) Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Research Update 22, University of Surrey.
- Heaton J. (1999) The gaze and visibility of the carer. A Foucauldian analysis of the discourse of informal care. Sociology of Health and Illness 21, 759–777.
-
Lavery J. &
Clarke V. (1999) Prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' coping and marital adjustment.
Psychology, Health and Medicine
4, 289–302.
10.1080/135485099106225 Google Scholar
- Li S. & Arber A. (2006) The construction of troubled and credible patients: a study of emotion talk in palliative care settings. Qualitative Health Research 16, 27–44.
- Maliski S.L., Heilemann M.V. & McCorkle R. (2001) Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: his work, her work, our work. Oncology Nursing Forum 6, 985–992.
- Moore A. (2001) Pragmatics. [Accessed 15 April, 2008]. Available at: http://www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/pragmatics.htm
- Morris S.M. (2001) Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qualitative Health Research 11, 553–567.
- Morris S.M. & Thomas C. (2001) The carer's place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting? European Journal of Cancer Care 10, 87–95.
- Morris S.M. & Thomas C. (2002) The need to know: informal carers and information. European Journal of Cancer Care 11, 183–187.
- Nanton V., Docherty A., Meystre C. & Dale J. (2008) Finding a pathway: Information and uncertainty along the prostate cancer patient journey. British Journal of Health Psychology. epub ahead of print. DOI: 1348/135910708X342890.
- Ong L., Visser M., Lammes F. & De Haes J. (2000) Doctor-patient communication and cancer patient quality of life and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling 41, 145–156.
-
Pahl J. (1989) Money and Marriage. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
10.1007/978-1-349-20268-3 Google Scholar
- Pahl J.M. & Pahl R.E. (1971) Managers and Their Wives. Allen Lane, London, UK.
- Pope C., Ziebland S. & Mays N. (2000) Education and debate: qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal 320, 114–116.
- Resendes L. & McCorkle R. (2006) Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Investigation 24, 192–198.
- Riechers E.A. (2004) Including partners into the diagnosis of prostate cancer to provide a model of care. Urology Nursing 24, 22–29.
- Semino E., Heywood J. & Short M. (2004) Methodological problems in the analysis of metaphors in a corpus of conversations about cancer. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1271–1294.
- Soloway C.T., Soloway M.S., Kim S.S. & Kava B.R. (2005) Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of he prostate cancer couple. British Journal of Urology International 95, 780–785.
- Thomas C. & Morris S.M. (2002) Informal carers in cancer contexts. European Journal of Cancer Care 11, 178–182.
-
Thomas C.,
Morris S.M. &
Harman J.C. (2002) Companions through cancer: the care given by informal carers in cancer contexts.
Social Science and Medicine
54, 529–544.
10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00048-X Google Scholar
- Wootten A.C., Burney S., Foroudi F., Frydenberg M., Coleman G. & Ng K. (2007) Psychological adjustment of survivors of localised prostate cancer: investigating the role of dyadic adjustment, cognitive appraisal and coping style. Psycho-Oncology 16, 1–19. epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1159.
- Wortham S.E.F. (1996) Mapping participant deictics: a technique for discovering speakers' footing. Journal of Pragmatics 25, 331–348.