Volume 76, Issue 3 pp. 399-406
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Acromegaly surgery in Manchester revisited – The impact of reducing surgeon numbers and the 2010 consensus guidelines for disease remission

Yi Yuen Wang

Yi Yuen Wang

Departments of Neurosurgery

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Higham

Claire Higham

Endocrinology, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust (SRFT), Salford

Search for more papers by this author
Tara Kearney

Tara Kearney

Endocrinology, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust (SRFT), Salford

Search for more papers by this author
Julian R.E. Davis

Julian R.E. Davis

Endocrine Sciences Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Trainer

Peter Trainer

Department of Endocrinology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Kanna K. Gnanalingham

Kanna K. Gnanalingham

Departments of Neurosurgery

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 August 2011
Citations: 57
Yi Yuen Wang, Department of Neurosurgery, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK. Tel.: +44 0161 206 4340; Fax: +44 0161 206 4606; E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Introduction Surgical remission rates for acromegaly vary and are dependent on the tumour morphology, biochemical definition of disease remission and surgical expertise. A previous report from the Manchester region in 1998 reported an overall surgical remission rate of 27% using accepted criteria for biochemical remission at the time. The establishment of the 2010 Consensus guidelines further tightens biochemical criteria for remission. This report aims to assess the impact of establishing a specialist pituitary surgery service in Manchester in 2005, with reduced surgeon numbers on the remission rates for acromegaly surgery.

Methods Patients with acromegaly undergoing first time endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery between 2005 and 2010 were studied. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Review of a prospectively collected acromegaly surgery database was performed with documentation of pre- and postoperative biochemical tests [oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) and IGF-1], as well as clinical, pathological and radiological data. Definition of disease remission was according to the 2010 Consensus criteria (GH nadir <0·4 μg/l following an oGTT and normalized population matched IGF-1).

Results There were 43 consecutive patients with acromegaly, with 13 (30%) microadenomas and 12 (28%) invasive adenomas. Overall, surgical remission was achieved in 29 (67%) patients. The remission rates were similar between micro (77%), macro (63%) and giant (67%) adenomas. There were nonsignificant trends towards higher remission rates for noninvasive tumours compared with invasive tumours (74%vs 50%) and for patients with a preoperative GH nadir <10 μg/l (73%vs 54%) and IGF-1 standard deviation score <15 (72%vs 54%).

Conclusions Remission rates for acromegaly surgery have improved following establishment of a specialist surgical service, with a reduction in surgeon numbers. Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery remains an effective first-line treatment for achieving biochemical remission in acromegaly, despite the introduction of the more stringent 2010 consensus guidelines.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.