Volume 22, Issue 7 pp. 717-723
Full Access

The influence of terfenadine and ipratropium bromide alone and in combination on bradykinin-induced nasal symptoms and plasma protein leakage

K. RAJAKULASINGAM

Corresponding Author

K. RAJAKULASINGAM

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Dr K. Rajakulasingam, Medicine I, Centre Block, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO9 4XY, U.K.Search for more papers by this author
R. POLOSA

R. POLOSA

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
L. C. K. LAU

L. C. K. LAU

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
M. K. CHURCH

M. K. CHURCH

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
S. T. HOLGATE

S. T. HOLGATE

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
P. H. HOWARTH

P. H. HOWARTH

Immunopharmacology Group, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: July 1992
Citations: 7

Summary

Nasal instillation of bradykinin elicits many of the characteristic features of rhinitis. To assess the relevance of histamine release from metachromatic cells and the activation of cholinergic pathways, we investigated the effects of terfenadine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, and ipratroprium bromide, a selective antimuscarinic agent, on bradykinin induced rhinorrhoea, nasal airways resistance (NAR), nasal pain and plasma protein leakage. Oral terfenadine (120 mg) or matched placebo and nasal ipratropium bromide (80 μg) or matched placebo were administered at 4 hr and 30 min respectively prior to bradykinin nasal challenge in two randomized, double-blind and cross-over studies on eight non-rhinitic subjects. Thus subjects received either double-placebo, oral terfenadine and nasal placebo, oral placebo and nasal ipratopium bromide or oral terfenadine and nasal ipratropium bromide, as pretreatment. Bradykinin challenge induced mean maximal increases of 57%, 59%, 77% and 72% in NAR on the placebo, terfenadine, ipratropium bromide and terfenadine plus ipratropium bromide pretreatment days respectively. These increments were not significantly different. Similarly rhinorrhoea and nasal pain induced by bradykinin nasal challenge were not significantly different on the four challenge days. Bradykinin nasal challenge caused a mean maximal increase in albumin levels in recovered nasal lavages of 11.5, 13.0, 12.2 and 12.3 times of baseline levels on the placebo, terfenadine, ipratropium bromide and terfenadine plus ipratroprium bromide pretreatment days respectively. Similarly total protein levels achieved a mean maximal increase of 8.0, 8.2, 7.9 and 8.8 times of baseline levels on these challenge days. The increments in both albumin and total protein did not significantly differ on the 4 challenge days. This study, therefore, demonstrates that cholinergic pathways and mast cell release of histamine do not contribute to increase in NAR, rhinorrhoea and plasma protein extravasation induced by bradykinin.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.