Volume 77, Issue 4 pp. 473-477
Full Access

Acute myeloid leukaemia in childhood: the costs and benefits of intensive treatment

Marianne Phillips

Marianne Phillips

LRF Centre for Childhood Leukaemia at Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, and Institute of Child Health, Guilford Street, London

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Richards

Susan Richards

Clinical Trials Service Unit, Oxford

Search for more papers by this author
Judith Chessells

Corresponding Author

Judith Chessells

LRF Centre for Childhood Leukaemia at Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, and Institute of Child Health, Guilford Street, London

Professor J. Chessells, LRF Centre for Childhood Leukaemia, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London.Search for more papers by this author
First published: April 1991
Citations: 8

Abstract

Summary. Response to treatment and resource implications were compared in two groups of children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated during consecutive periods. Event-free survival at 5 years improved from 12% (SE 3·4) during 1972–82 (group A) to 45% (SE 6·9) during 1983–87 (group B). The median time spent in hospital increased from 35 to 170 d. Allogeneic marrow transplantation was offered to all eligible children in group B. Eleven of the 53 children had a suitable donor and 10 proceeded to bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The relapse rate was lower after BMT than after chemotherapy, although not significantly so. We conclude that there has been a real improvement in prognosis for children with AML that modern treatment requires intensive hospital resources and that these results should encourage further efforts to improve outlook and to explore treatments not involving radiation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.