Volume 132, Issue 3 pp. 437-440
Full Access

Treatment of basal cell carcinoma by dermatologists in the United Kingdom

R.J MOTLEY

Corresponding Author

R.J MOTLEY

On behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists Audit Subcommittee and the British Society for Dermatological Surgery

Dr R.J.Motley, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF4 4XW, U.K.Search for more papers by this author
D.J GOULD

D.J GOULD

On behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists Audit Subcommittee and the British Society for Dermatological Surgery

Search for more papers by this author
W.S DOUGLAS

W.S DOUGLAS

On behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists Audit Subcommittee and the British Society for Dermatological Surgery

Search for more papers by this author
N.B SIMPSON

N.B SIMPSON

On behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists Audit Subcommittee and the British Society for Dermatological Surgery

Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1995
Citations: 31

Summary

Details of presentation and treatment were obtained prospectively by questionnaire for 1366 patients with basal cell carcinoma, first attending under the care of 166 consultant dermatologists in the U.K., during a 2-week period. One thousand five hundred and ninety-seven tumours were reported in these patients (median age 71 years). Most were situated on the head and neck, and their median size was 9 mm. Excision was the most common treatment used in 58% of tumours, curettage and cautery was used in 24%, cryotherapy in 8%, and radiotherapy in 8%. On average, one in four tumours were referred to other specialists for treatment (range 0–70%). Very few patients (2%) were referred to a combined dermatology/radiotherapy/plastic surgery clinic, calling into question its value and availability. There was considerable variation in practices between dermatologists, demonstrating a clear need for individual, local audit of the management of this common dermatological problem. The data collected in this study form a suitable measure with which local performance may be compared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.