Volume 31, Issue 12 pp. 1365-1370

Faecal lactoferrin – a novel test to differentiate between the irritable and inflamed bowel?

R. SIDHU

R. SIDHU

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
P. WILSON

P. WILSON

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A. WRIGHT

A. WRIGHT

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
C. W. H. YAU

C. W. H. YAU

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
F. A. D’CRUZ

F. A. D’CRUZ

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
L. FOYE

L. FOYE

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK

Search for more papers by this author
S. MORLEY

S. MORLEY

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A. J. LOBO

A. J. LOBO

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
M. E. MCALINDON

M. E. MCALINDON

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
D. S. SANDERS

D. S. SANDERS

Gastroenterology & Liver Unit

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 May 2010
Citations: 41
Dr R. Sidhu, Consultant Gastroenterologist, Room P39, P Floor, Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31, 1365–1370

Summary

Background Distinguishing between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can be challenging.

Aims To investigate the utility of faecal lactoferrin as a marker of inflammation in patients with IBD, IBS and controls.

Methods Disease activity in IBD patients was assessed using the modified Harvey–Bradshaw Activity Index. Stool samples were analysed using an ELISA assay.

Results We recruited 137 patients with IBS, 126 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 104 with Crohn’s disease (CD), and 98 healthy volunteers. The median ± IQ lactoferrin concentration (μg/g faecal weight) was 0 ± 1.4 for IBS patients, 6.6 ± 42 for UC patients, 4 ± 12.7 for CD patients and 0.5 ± 2 for healthy controls. Lactoferrin levels were significantly higher in IBD patients compared with IBS/healthy controls (P < 0.001). The median lactoferrin concentrations were significantly higher in active UC & CD patients compared with inactive patients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of lactoferrin in distinguishing active IBD from IBS/healthy controls were 67% and 96%, 87% and 86.8% respectively.

Conclusions Lactoferrin is useful to differentiate between IBD and IBS, and can be used as an adjunct to blood parameters to determine IBD patients who have ongoing inflammation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.