Competition, niche specialization and the evolution of brain size in the genus Peromyscus
GEORGINA M. MACE
National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20008, U.S.A.
*Department of Zoology, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, Tyne and Wear, U.K.
Search for more papers by this authorJOHN F. EISENBERG
National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20008, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorGEORGINA M. MACE
National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20008, U.S.A.
*Department of Zoology, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, Tyne and Wear, U.K.
Search for more papers by this authorJOHN F. EISENBERG
National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20008, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Previous studies of relative brain size in mammals have suggested an association with complex habitats and with low reproductive rate. In order to examine the causal relationships more thoroughly, a detailed examination of relative brain size variation in the genus Peromyscus was undertaken. Endocranial volumes were used to estimate brain weight for 32 species including 161 subspecies, and relative brain size calculated as the species deviation from the allometric relationship between brain and body size. The intrageneric allometric coefficient was higher than most values previously reported from low taxonomic levels, but intraspecific coefficients were generally lower than this.
Island species, and relict species isolated on mountain tops, which may be ecological ‘islands’, had consistently small relative brain sizes, but peninsular species were large brained. Among the remaining species there were significant correlations between litter size and relative brain size, and between the number of competitor species and relative brain size. Species with many competitor species have relatively large brains and small litters. It is concluded that the nature of the geographical distribution, the pattern of species formation and habitat complexity all influence relative brain size in existing forms.
REFERENCES
-
BAUCHOT, R. &
STEPHAN, H., 1966. Donnees nouvelles sur l'encephalization des insectivores et des Prosimiens.
Mammalia, 30: 160–196.
10.1515/mamm.1966.30.1.160 Google Scholar
-
BAUCHOT, R. &
STEPHAN, H., 1969. Encephalization et niveau evolutif chez les simiens.
Mammalia, 33: 225–275.
10.1515/mamm.1969.33.2.225 Google Scholar
- BROWN, J. H., 1971. Mammals on mountain tops; nonequilibrium insular biogeography. American Naturalist, 105: 467–178.
- CASE, T. J., 1978. A general explanation for insular body size trends in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecology, 59: 1–18.
- CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H. & HARVEY, P. H., 1980. Primates, brains and ecology. Journal of Zoology, 190: 309–324.
- EISENBERG, J. F. & WILSON, D. E., 1978. Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the Chiroptera. Evolution, 32: 740–751.
- EISENBERG, J. F. & WILSON, D. E. 1981. Relative brain size and demographic strategies in marsupials. American Naturalist, US: 1–15.
- FOSTER, J. B., 1964. Evolution of mammals on islands. Nature, 202: 234–235.
- GLAZIER, D. S., 1980. Ecological shifts and the evolution of geographically restricted species of Peromyscus (mice). Journal of Biogeography, 7: 63–83.
- GOODWIN, G. G., 1969. Mammals from the state of Oaxaca, Mexico, in the American Museum of Natural History. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 141: 1–270.
- GOULD, S. J., 1971. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size. American Naturalist, 105: 113–136.
- GOULD, S. J., 1975a. Allometry in primates with an emphasis on scaling and evolution of the brain. Contributions to Primatology, 5: 244–292.
- GOULD, S. J., 1975b. On scaling of tooth size in mammals. American Zoologist, 15: 351–362.
- HALL, E. R. & DALQUEST, W. W., 1963. The mammals of Veracruz. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, 14: 165–362.
- HALL, E. R. & KELSON, K. W., 1959. The mammals of North America. New York : Ronald Press.
- HARVEY, P. H. & MACE, G. M., 1982. Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends. In Kings College Sociobiology Group (Eds), Current Problems in Sociobiology: 343–361. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- HIBBARD, C. W., 1968. Palaeontology. In J. A. King (Ed.), Biology of Peromyscus, Special publication No. 2 of the American Society of Mammalogists.
- HOOPER, E. T., 1968. Classification. In J. A. King (Ed.), Biology of Peromyscus, Special publication No. 2 of the American Society of Mammalogists.
- HORNER, E. B., 1954. Arboreal adaptations of Peromyscus with special reference to the use of the tail. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, 61: 1–84.
- JERISON, H. J., 1969. Brain evolution and dinosaur brains. American Naturalist, 103: 575–588.
- JERISON, H. J., 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. London : Academic Press.
- JERISON, H. J., 1977. The theory of encephalization. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 299: 146–160.
- JOLICOEUR, P. & MOSIMANN, J. E., 1968. Intervalles de confiance pour la pentre de l'axe majeur d'une distribution bidimensionelle. Biometrie-Praxmetrie, 9: 121–140.
- KING, J. A., 1968. Biology of Peromyscus. Special publication No. 2 of the American Society of Mammalogists.
- KRAEMER, H. C., 1975. On estimation and hypothesis testing problems for correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 40: 473–484.
- KREBS, C. J., 1978. Ecology. New York : Harper & Row.
- LANDE, R., 1979. A quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution, 33: 402–416.
- LAYNE, J. N., 1968. Ontogeny. In J. A. King (Ed.), Biology of Peromyscus, Special publication No. 2 of the American Society of Mammalogists.
- LAYNE, J. N., 1970. Climbing behaviour of Peromyscus floridanus and Peromyscus gossypinus. Journal of Mammalogy, 51: 580–591.
- LEMEN, C., 1980. Relationship between relative brain size and climbing ability in Peromyscus. Journal of Mammalogy, 61: 360–364.
-
MacARTHUR, R. H. &
WILSON, E. O., 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography.
Princeton
,
N. J.
: Princeton University Press.
10.1111/j.1463-6409.2007.00280.x Google Scholar
- McCABE, T. T. & BLANCHARD, B. D., 1950. Three Species of Peromyscus. Santa Barbara, California : Rood Associates.
- MACE, G. M., HARVEY, P. H. & CLUTTON-BROCK, T. H., 1981. Brain size and ecology in small mammals. Journal of Zoology, 193: 333–354.
- OSGOOD, W. H., 1909. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna, 28: 1–285.
- PIANKA, E. R., 1970. On r and K selection. American Naturalist, 104: 592–597.
- PIRLOT, P. & STEPHAN, H., 1970. Encephalization in Chiroptera. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 48: 433–444.
- RICKART, E. A., 1977. Reproduction, growth and development in two cloud forest Peromyscus from southern Mexico. Occasional Papers, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, No. 67, pp. 1–22.
- ROHLF, F. J. & SOKAL, R. R., 1969. Statistical Tables. San Francisco : W. H. Freeman.
- ROOD, J. P., 1966. Observations on the reproduction ofPeromyscus in captivity. American Naturalist, 76: 496–503.
- SACHER, G. A., 1959. Relation of lifespan to brain weight and body weight in mammals. In G. E. Woolstenholme & M. O'Connor (Eds), CIBA Foundation Colloquia on Ageing, Vol. 5. The Life Span of Animals. London : Churchill.
-
SACHER, G. A., 1975. Maturation and longevity in relation to cranial capacity in hominid evolution. In
R. H. Tuttle (Ed.), Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution,
The Hague
: Morton.
10.1515/9783110803808.417 Google Scholar
- SACHER, G. A. & STAFFELDT, E. F., 1974. Relation of gestation time to brain weight for placental mammals. Implications for the theory of vertebrate growth. American Naturalist, 108: 593–615.
- SCHMIDLY, D. J., 1977. The Mammals of Trans Pecos, Texas. Texas : Texas A & M University Press.
- SIEGEL, M. J. & VAN METER J., 1973. Skeletal correlates of ecological adaptation in two species of Peromyscus. Journal of Mammalogy, 54: 275–278.
- SIMPSON, G. G., 1964. Species density of North American recent mammals. Systematic Zoology, 13: 57–73.
-
SMITH, M. H. &
McGINNIS, J. T., 1968. Relationships of latitude, altitude and body size to litter size and mean annual production of offspring in Peromyscus.
Researches on Population Ecology, 10: 115–126.
10.1007/BF02510868 Google Scholar
- SNEDECOR, G. W. & COCHRANE, W. G., 1967. Statistical Methods. Ames , Iowa : Iowa State University Press.
- SOKAL, R. R. & ROHLF, F. J., 1969. Biometry. San Francisco : W. H. Freeman.
- STEBBINS, G. L., 1942. The genetic approach to problems of rare or endemic species. Madrono, 6: 241–258.
- WAGNER, H. O., 1961. Die Nagetiere einer Gebirgsabdachung in Siidmexico und ihre Beziehungen hungen zur Umwelt. Zoologische Jahrbiicher, Abteilung für Systematik, 89: 177–242.