A MODEL OF THE EVOLUTION OF DICHOGAMY INCORPORATING SEX-RATIO SELECTION, ANTHER-STIGMA INTERFERENCE, AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION
Risa D. Sargent
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140; Email: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorMohammad A. Mandegar
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSarah P. Otto
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRisa D. Sargent
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140; Email: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorMohammad A. Mandegar
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSarah P. Otto
Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Abstract Historically, explanations for the evolution of floral traits that reduce self-fertilization have tended to focus on selection to avoid inbreeding depression. However, there is growing support for the hypothesis that such traits also play a role in promoting efficient pollen dispersal by reducing anther-stigma interference. The relative importance of these two selective pressures is currently a popular topic of investigation. To date, there has been no theoretical exploration of the relative contributions of selection to avoid the genetic costs of self-fertilization and selection to promote efficient pollen dispersal on the evolution of floral traits. We developed a population genetic model to examine the influence of these factors on the evolution of dichogamy: the temporal separation of anther maturation and stigma receptivity. Our analysis indicates that anther-stigma interference can favor dichogamy even in the absence of inbreeding depression. Although anther-stigma interference and inbreeding depression are the key forces driving the initial evolution of dichogamy, selection to match the timing of pollen dispersal to the availability of ovules at the population level becomes a more potent force opposing the further evolution of dichogamy as the extent of temporal separation increases. This result may help to explain otherwise puzzling phenomena such as why dichogamy is rarely complete in nature and why dichogamy tends to be associated with asynchronous flower presentation.
Literature Cited
- Aizen, M. A., and A. Basilio. 1995. Within and among flower sexphase distribution Alstromeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). Can. J. Bot. 73: 1986–1994.
- Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Genet. 3: 274–284.
- Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philos. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 358: 991–1004.
- Bertin, R. I. 1993. Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 80: 557–560.
- Bertin, R. I., and C. M. Newman. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59: 112–152.
- Brunet, J. 1996. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77: 2458–2471.
- Brunet, J., and D. Charlesworth. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants: Evolution 49: 70–79.
- Cesaro, A. C., S. C. H. Barrett, S. Maurice, B. E. Vaissiere, and J. D. Thompson. 2004. An experimental evaluation of self-interference in Narcissus assoanus: functional and evolutionary implications. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 1367–1376.
- Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. Camb. 74: 329–340.
- Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237–268.
-
Darwin, C.
1876. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Murray,
London
.
10.5962/bhl.title.110800 Google Scholar
- Dudash, M. R., and C. B. Fenster. 2001. The role of breeding system and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of an outcrossing mating strategy in Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1953–1959.
- Fetscher, A. E. 2001. Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 525–529.
-
Fisher, R. A.
1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover,
New York
.
10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1445:SOEFDD]2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11: 53–63.
- Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36: 47–79.
- Harder, L. D., and M. A. Aizen. 2004. The functional significance of synchronous protandry in Alstroemeria aurea. Funct. Ecol. 18: 467–474.
- Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. Am. Nat. 152: 684–695.
- Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 315–320.
- Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416: 320–323.
- Holsinger, K. E. 1991. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 307–308.
- Holsinger, K. E., M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christianson. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. Am. Nat. 124: 446–453.
- Hossaert-McKey, M., and J. L. Bronstein. 2001. Self-pollination and its costs in a monoecious fig (Ficus aurea, Moraceae) in a highly seasonal subtropical enviornment. Am. J. Bot. 88: 685–692.
- Huang, S.-Q., L.-L. Tang, Q. Yu, and Y.-H. Guo. 2004. Temporal floral sex allocation in protogynous Aquilegia yabeana contrasts with protandrous species: support for the mating enviornment hypothesis. Evolution 58: 1131–1134.
- Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54–70.
- Kalisz, S., D. W. Vogler, and K. M. Hanley. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430: 884–887.
- Kohn, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1992. Floral manipulation reveal the cause of male fitness variation in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6: 590–595.
- Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24–40.
- Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67–79.
- Lloyd, D. G. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 153: 370–380.
- Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. N. Z. J. Bot. 24: 135–162.
- Lloyd, D. G., and J. M. A. Yates. 1982. Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36: 903–913.
-
Maynard Smith, J.
1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge
,
U.K.
10.1017/CBO9780511806292 Google Scholar
- Mazer, S. J., H. Paz, and M. D. Bell. 2004. Life history, floral development, and mating system in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae): Do floral and whole-plant rates of development evolve independently Am. J. Bot. 91: 2041–2050.
- Medan, D., and N. Bartoloni. 1998. Fecundity effects of dichogamy in an asynchronically flowering population: a genetic model. Ann. Bot. 81: 373–383.
- Nagylaki, T. 1976. A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. J. Theor. Biol. 58: 55–58.
- Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 497–508.
- Renner, S. S. 2001. How common is heterodichogamy Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 595–597.
- Routley, M. B., and B. C. Husband. 2003. The effect of protandry on siring success in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) with different inflorescence sizes. Evolution 57: 240–248.
- Routley, M. B., and B. C. Husband. 2005. Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1050–1059.
- Routley, M. B., R. I. Bertin, and B. C. Husband. 2004. Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165: 983–993.
- Sargent, R. D., and B. D. Roitberg. 2000. Seasonal decline in malephase duration in a protandrous plant: a response to inreased mating opportunities Funct. Ecol. 14: 484–489.
- Schoen, D. J., and T.-L. Ashman. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49: 131–139.
- Uyenoyama, M. K., and D. M. Waller. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40: 14–46.
- Wells, M. S., and D. G. Lloyd. 1991. Dichogamy, gender variation and bet-hedging in Pseudowintera colorata. Evol. Ecol. 5: 310–326.
- Wyatt, R. 1983. Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. Pp. 51–95 in L. Real, ed. Pollination biology Academic Press, Toronto .