Volume 35, Issue 3 pp. 639-647
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of scanning strategies on trueness and time efficiency of digital impression on paediatric models

Dilara Şeyma Alpkılıç-İşsever

Corresponding Author

Dilara Şeyma Alpkılıç-İşsever

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence

Dilara Şeyma Alpkılıç-İşsever, İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Süleymaniye, Prof. Dr. Cavit Orhan Tütengil Sk, No: 4, 34116 Fatih/Istanbul, Turkey.

Email: [email protected] and [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Müge Tokuç

Müge Tokuç

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul Okan University, Tuzla, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 October 2024
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

Various scanning methods aim to reduce intraoral scanner errors, yet no specific approach targets paediatric patients.

Aim

Evaluate continuous (C) and noncontinuous (NC) scanning patterns' impact on the trueness and duration of paediatric digital impressions.

Design

A standard pedodontic typodont model was scanned with a Trios 4 Move+ IOS using four scanning strategies. C1 and C2 followed continuous scanning from the right molars, with different directions. NC1 scanned noncontinuously from the right molar, with breaks every four teeth. NC2 began at the right primary incisor, with breaks after every three teeth. Each scan, performed five times by one researcher, was timed. Industrial scanning provided reference data. Deviations were analyzed using the MIXED procedure.

Results

NC1 had higher deviations in the lower jaw, whereas C1 and NC1 showed higher deviations in the upper jaw (p < .001). C1 had significantly higher deviations in the upper jaw than the lower jaw (p = .041). NC2 had the longest scanning time in both upper and lower jaws (p = .002).

Conclusion

Paediatric digital impressions benefit from starting at the anterior and incorporating breaks, although this increases scanning time.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.