Volume 24, Issue 4 pp. 286-294
Feature Article

The value of purpose built mental health facilities: Use of the Ward Atmosphere Scale to gauge the link between milieu and physical environment

Daniel Nicholls

Corresponding Author

Daniel Nicholls

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Correspondence: Dr Daniel Nicholls, School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Kidd

Kevin Kidd

Mental Health, Justice Health, Alcohol and Drugs Services, ACT Government Health Directorate, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Threader

Jennifer Threader

Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Hungerford

Catherine Hungerford

Faculty of Health, University of Canberra

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 May 2015
Citations: 16
Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Receipt of funding was not dependent upon findings of the research. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Daniel Nicholls, RN, PhD.
Kevin Kidd, RN, MHA.
Jennifer Threader, PhD Candidate/Psychologist.
Catherine Hungerford, RN, PhD.

Abstract

This study investigated changes in the ‘atmosphere’ of an acute adult mental health setting following relocation to a new purpose-built facility. The Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS) was designed and validated for specific use in hospital-based psychiatric facilities, and measures several dimensions of an environment. In this study, the WAS was administered to consumers and staff at periods before and also after their relocation to a new purpose-built acute adult mental health facility. There were significant improvements in the physical atmosphere of the new facility, when compared with the old facility. In terms of ward atmosphere, however, improvements were seen to occur in only a small number of measures and there were minor differences between consumers' and staff perspectives on some indicators. Interestingly, it was found that consumers noted less ‘staff control’ in the new setting, raising the question of the differences in understanding of control. For staff only, there was a perception of greater levels of consumer ‘involvement’ in the new facility. Despite the minor differences in perception, the study does confirm that architecture is an important influence on the ‘atmosphere’ of a health facility, for both staff and consumers.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.