Volume 31, Issue 4 pp. 404-408
Original Article

Validation of schedules for optimal prostate-specific antigen monitoring after radical prostatectomy

Leandro Blas

Leandro Blas

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masaki Shiota

Corresponding Author

Masaki Shiota

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Correspondence

Masaki Shiota M.D., Ph.D., Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Tokiyoshi Tanegashima

Tokiyoshi Tanegashima

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shigehiro Tsukahara

Shigehiro Tsukahara

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shohei Ueda

Shohei Ueda

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Jun Mutaguchi

Jun Mutaguchi

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shunsuke Goto

Shunsuke Goto

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Satoshi Kobayashi

Satoshi Kobayashi

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takashi Matsumoto

Takashi Matsumoto

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Junichi Inokuchi

Junichi Inokuchi

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masatoshi Eto

Masatoshi Eto

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 December 2023
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background

Early detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is crucial for early treatment and improving survival outcomes. The optimal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring remains unclear, and several models have been proposed. We aimed to externally validate four models for optimal PSA monitoring after RP and propose modifications to improve them.

Methods

We reviewed the clinicopathological data of 896 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP between 2009 and 2022. We examined all PSA values and estimated the PSA value for four monitoring schedules at each time point in the virtual follow-up. We defined the ideal PSA for BCR detection between 0.2 and 0.4 ng/mL.

Results

During the median follow-up of 21.4 months, 128 (14.3%) patients presented BCR. The original and modified Keio models, National Cancer Center Hospital model, and American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology model detected BCR in 14 (10.9%), three (2.3%), 12 (9.4%), and 11 (8.6%) patients with PSA >0.4 ng/mL. Most patients experienced BCR detected with PSA >0.4 ng/mL during the first year postoperative. The modification of interval within 6 months postoperative avoided BCR detection with PSA >0.4 ng/mL within the first year postoperative in 8/9 (88.9%), 1/2 (50.0%), 5/6 (83.3%), and 4/4 (100%) for the original and modified Keio models, National Cancer Center Hospital model, and American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology model, respectively.

Conclusion

We validated four models for PSA monitoring after RP to detect BCR and suggested modifications to avoid detections out of the desired range of PSA. These modifications could help to establish an optimal PSA monitoring schedule after RP.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.