Volume 41, Issue 6 pp. 738-744
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Lupus anticoagulant diagnosis in patients receiving direct oral FXa inhibitors at trough levels: A real-life study

Juliette Gay

Juliette Gay

Service d’Hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jérôme Duchemin

Jérôme Duchemin

Service d’Hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Meriem Imarazene

Meriem Imarazene

Service d’Hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Michaela Fontenay

Michaela Fontenay

Service d’Hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR 8104, Cochin Institute, Université de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Georges Jourdi

Corresponding Author

Georges Jourdi

Service d’Hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France

Inserm UMR-S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, Université de Paris, Paris, France

Correspondence

Georges Jourdi, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Hematology Department, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris 75014, France.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 September 2019
Citations: 11

Abstract

Introduction

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) induce false positive results for lupus anticoagulant (LA) diagnosis. Consequently, it is suggested not to perform LA testing in xabans patients although it may be useful in selected patients. In this monocentric study, we evaluated xabans impact at trough levels (ie, just before the next intake) on LA diagnosis in treated patients using dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and two LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

Methods

Sixty patients receiving rivaroxaban (30) or apixaban (30) were included. Plasma concentrations were measured using specific anti-Xa assays. LA testing was performed using one dRVVT (LAC-Screening®/Confirm®; Siemens) and two LA sensitive aPTT-based assays (Hemosil® Silica Clotting Time (SCT) Screen/Confirm; Werfen and Dade® Actin® Factor Sensitivity FSL/FS (Actin F); Siemens).

Results

Median [min-max] concentrations were 23 [<18-68] for rivaroxaban and 42 ng/mL [19-99] for apixaban. dRVVT was positive in 93% of rivaroxaban and 40% of apixaban samples. SCT was positive in 40 and 30% and Actin F in 17 and 20% of samples respectively. Xabans affected more significantly dRVVT than aPTT-based assays (P < .001) with less false positive results with apixaban than with rivaroxaban samples irrespective of the assay used.

Conclusion

lupus anticoagulant diagnosis in rivaroxaban and apixaban samples drawn at trough levels remains questionable whenever positive results are obtained. If LA testing in apixaban samples might be useful to rule-out LA using dRVVT and/or aPTT-based assays, the wide majority of rivaroxaban samples would give false positive results.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.