Volume 63, Issue 4 pp. 512-516
Original Article

Perceptions and impact of patient reviews: a survey of academic dermatologists

Rebekah Leigh

Rebekah Leigh

Loma Linda University, School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dahyeon Kim

Dahyeon Kim

Loma Linda University, School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Marina Kristy Ibraheim

Marina Kristy Ibraheim

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christina Kraus

Christina Kraus

Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Conroy Chow

Conroy Chow

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Janiene Luke

Janiene Luke

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Harry Dao

Harry Dao

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nancy Anderson

Nancy Anderson

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fu-Sheng Chou

Fu-Sheng Chou

Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA

Kaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ashley Elsensohn

Corresponding Author

Ashley Elsensohn

Loma Linda University, Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Loma Linda University, Department of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda, CA, USA

Correspondence

Ashley Elsensohn

Pathology and Human Anatomy

Loma Linda University

25865 Barton Road, Suite 101, Building D

Loma Linda, CA 92354

USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 February 2024
Citations: 2

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding source: None.

Abstract

Background

Patient reviews (PRs) have emerged as a method to assess patient experiences with healthcare in order to improve the quality of care. Both institutional and third-party organizations collect quantitative data and comments from these patient surveys, usually accessible to the public for review. Our study examined dermatologists' perceptions of PRs and assessed their impact on dermatologists.

Methods

A survey was sent to the Association of Professors of Dermatology listserv (response rate 30%).

Results

Most respondents disagreed with the statements that PRs are good for doctors (63%), good for patients (58%), helpful for doctors (58%), or that high PRs indicate being a good doctor (65%). The majority disagreed that PRs should be available publicly (60%). Respondents agreed that PRs contribute to depersonalization (60%), energy depletion or exhaustion (55%), added stress at work (70%), negativism/cynicism about work (60%), and diminished professional efficacy (29%). Self-identified female respondents were more likely to agree that PRs added stress to work compared to self-identified males (66% vs. 42%, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, these findings suggest that PRs may negatively impact dermatologists' well-being and perceived stress levels.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.