Large-scale population genetic structure in Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata
Abstract
In bird species that have a high movement capacity, dispersal may connect subpopulations over vast geographical regions, with important consequences for the design of conservation management strategies. Here we used a molecular approach to infer the patterns and rates of dispersal among eight Mediterranean subpopulations of the endangered Bonelli's Eagle, based on 245 individuals screened at 17 microsatellite loci. There was moderate genetic differentiation between subpopulations sampled in the western (Iberia and Morocco) and eastern (Cyprus) Mediterranean, whereas differentiation among subpopulations in the former region was weak to moderate and followed a pattern of isolation by distance. Within the western Mediterranean, the small, peripheral and ecologically unique population of southwest Portugal had the lowest genetic diversity and the highest differentiation. The remaining subpopulations formed two loose clusters, one including Morocco and southwest and eastern Spain, and the other northeast Portugal and western and central Spain. Few recent migrants were detected, and they originated primarily from adjacent subpopulations. Our findings suggest that western Mediterranean Bonelli's Eagles may have a large-scale metapopulation structure, with subpopulations connected to some extent by distance-dependent dispersal, probably influenced by natal philopatry and the geographical configuration of subpopulations. The combination of marked ecological and genetic divergence suggests that the peripheral subpopulation of southwest Portugal may be regarded as a distinct management unit.
The spatial subdivision of once continuous populations due to human activity is considered one of the major contributors to species extinction (Fahrig 2003, Fischer & Lindenmayer 2007). Whereas subdivision may influence a population in diverse and complex ways, its long-term viability is often critically affected by dispersal among local subpopulations (Hanski 1999). Dispersal has direct demographic effects by influencing, for instance, the probability of patch recolonization after local extinction and the persistence of subpopulations through source-sink dynamics (Pulliam 1988, Hanski 1999). Furthermore, dispersal influences long-term population viability through genetic effects because restricted gene flow may lead to inbreeding depression and the loss of genetic diversity (Frankham et al. 2002).
In bird species with high movement capacity, dispersal has the potential to connect demographically and genetically local subpopulations separated by hundreds or even thousands of kilometres (e.g. Barlow et al. 2011, Geraci et al. 2012), with important consequences for the design of conservation management strategies (e.g. Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, Alcaide et al. 2009). However, quantifying dispersal in these species is challenging and often requires large-scale and long-term studies based on laborious and expensive capture-mark-recapture techniques (Stenseth & Lidicker 1992). To circumvent this problem, molecular approaches associated with powerful statistical techniques have increasingly provided a practical alternative with which to investigate dispersal (Broquet & Petit 2009). The spatial distribution of genetic diversity and differentiation among subpopulations has been used to infer the rates and patterns of historical gene flow, which in turn provide clues to understand how dispersal is affected by geographical, ecological and behavioural factors (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, Banks et al. 2005, Callens et al. 2011). Analyses based on individual multilocus genotypic data have also enabled estimation of contemporary migration rates, and the identification of migrants and their most likely origins (Taylor et al. 2007, Lancaster et al. 2011). Although all these approaches have some limitations because different population-level processes may result in similar genetic patterns (Broquet & Petit 2009), they may still provide useful information to support conservation management practices, particularly if genetic inferences are combined with life-history and demographic data (Banks et al. 2005, Alcaide et al. 2009, Callens et al. 2011).
Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata is an endangered species in Europe (BirdLife International 2004), where it shows a marked pattern of large-scale population subdivision (Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001, Del Moral 2006), requiring improved information on dispersal patterns to guide ongoing conservation efforts (Soutullo et al. 2008, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010). In the Western Palaearctic, Bonelli's Eagles are mainly restricted to the Mediterranean region, with roughly 80% of European breeding pairs in the Iberian Peninsula (Del Moral 2006). The European population declined from the 1970s to the early 1990s, although at present the main subpopulations seem to be relatively stable or even increasing (Real & Mañosa 1997, Beja & Palma 2008, Soutullo et al. 2008, Carrascal & Seoane 2009a). In the Iberian Peninsula, Bonelli's Eagles appear to have a metapopulation structure (e.g. Soutullo et al. 2008), with a large proportion of breeding pairs in the core subpopulations of the Spanish Extremadura and Andalucia, surrounded by smaller and peripheral subpopulations in Portugal and eastern and northern Spain (Del Moral 2006, Equipa Atlas 2008). Connectivity among all subpopulations has often been assumed to be high (Soutullo et al. 2008), due to the large-scale dispersal capacity of individuals (Real & Mañosa 2001, Cadahía et al. 2010) and to the observation of territorial recruitment sometimes occurring hundreds of kilometres from an individual's place of birth (Cheylan et al. 1996, Cadahía et al. 2009, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010). However, dispersal may be behaviourally restricted because most individuals tend to exhibit some degree of natal philopatry (Greenwood & Harvey 1982), although females disperse further than males (Cheylan et al. 1996, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010). Previous studies based on mtDNA showed no differentiation among western Mediterranean subpopulations (Iberia and northwestern Africa), suggesting that the levels of gene flow may be sufficiently high to preclude the development of local genetic structure (Cadahía et al. 2007). However, the resolution of that study was limited because it used a single locus and the detected polymorphism was low (four haplotypes). Moreover, mtDNA is maternally inherited and thus it is only affected by female dispersal behaviour.
In this study we used 17 autosomal microsatellite loci in a variety of genetic analyses to test expectations regarding dispersal patterns among Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations in the Mediterranean region. If effective dispersal among all Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations is large and essentially unconstrained by distance, as assumed in earlier studies (Soutullo et al. 2008), then the entire population should be panmictic (Wright 1943, Kimura & Maruyama 1971). However, if dispersal is constrained by distance, due for instance to philopatric behaviour, then geographical distance would be associated with a certain degree of local differentiation and there might be a pattern of isolation by distance (Wright 1943, Kimura & Maruyama 1971). Furthermore, recent migrants detected in a population should be few and originate primarily from neighbouring populations. Finally, if effective dispersal and thus gene flow are very low, differentiation would be expected in the metapopulation system, and differences should be most pronounced in small and peripheral subpopulations (Eckert et al. 2008).
Methods
Study species
Bonelli's Eagle is a long-lived bird of prey (maximum age of reproduction: 25 years; Real & Mañosa 1997), with deferred maturity (age of first successful breeding: 4 years; Soutullo et al. 2008), relatively low fecundity (mean number of fledglings per breeding pair: 0.6–1.4; Del Moral 2006), and high adult survival (annual adult survival rate: 87.1–96.7%; Soutullo et al. 2008). Generation length varies across subpopulations but is between about 9 and 13 years (estimated from demographic parameters in Real & Mañosa 1997, Soutullo et al. 2008). Breeding individuals are territorial, and show strong pair bonding and stay with high tenacity in the breeding territory within and between years (Bosch et al. 2010). However, after fledging there is a transient nomadic phase before territorial recruitment, during which individuals range widely over hundreds or thousands of kilometres (Balbontín & Ferrer 2009, Cadahía et al. 2009, 2010). In a sample of Bonelli's Eagles marked as nestlings, territorial recruitment occurred primarily within or close to the natal subpopulation, with mean distance (± sd) from birthplace to the breeding territory of 136.9 ± 127.8 km (range 23–430 km; n = 22) for females, and 72.6 ± 60.9 km (19–239 km; n = 19) for males (recalculated from Hernández-Matías et al. 2010).
Sampling and microsatellite genotyping
Blood samples from 245 Bonelli's Eagle nestlings were collected in the Iberian Peninsula, Morocco and Cyprus (Table 1, Fig. 1). Samples within the western Mediterranean were considered representative of seven subpopulations (Fig. 1), identified on the basis of regional clusters of breeding territories largely separated by distribution gaps (Del Moral 2006). Three of these (west and southwest Spain and Morocco) contain the largest number of individuals, whereas the remaining subpopulations are much smaller and geographically peripheral to the core subpopulations. All these subpopulations were relatively close to each other (< 1000 km) and within the known range of movements undertaken by immature Bonelli's Eagles during the transient nomadic phase (Balbontín & Ferrer 2009, Cadahía et al. 2009, 2010). In contrast, Cyprus was far from the western Mediterranean populations (> 3000 km), with major discontinuities in the species’ distribution between the two localities (Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001).
Population | Years | N | N T | A | A 6 | H O | H E | F is |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Portugal | ||||||||
Southwest Portugal (SWP) | 1994–2000 | 79 | 19 | 3.19 ± 0.12 | 2.59 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.04 |
Northeast Portugal (NEP) | 1996–1999 | 34 | 19 | 4.86 ± 0.11 | 3.63 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.02 |
Spain | ||||||||
Southwest Spain (SWSP) | 1998–2000 | 26 | 20 | 4.67 ± 0.03 | 3.59 ± 0.23 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.003 | 0.004 ± 0.01 |
Western Spain (WSP) | 74 | 50 | 5.67 ± 0.09 | 3.64 ± 0.14 | 0.57 ± 0.003 | 0.60 ± 0.003 | 0.06a ± 0.01 | |
Central Spain (CSP) | 1997–1998 | 6 | 6 | 3.59 | 3.59 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.07 |
Eastern Spain (ESP) | 1999–2002 | 12 | 12 | 4.35 | 3.63 ± 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.02 |
NW Africa | ||||||||
Morocco (MOR) | 1998 | 8 | 8 | 4.00 | 3.65 ± 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.07 |
Eastern Mediterranean | ||||||||
Cyprus (CYP) | 1999 | 6 | 6 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.08 |
- a Statistically significant at P < 0.05 after controlling for false discovery rate.

All samples were preserved in Queen's lysis buffer (Seutin et al. 1991) until DNA extraction and further laboratory analysis. DNA was extracted using a blood extraction kit from Amersham-Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden). DNA was diluted to a final approximate concentration of 10 ng/μL. All individuals were genotyped for a total of 17 microsatellite loci, of which 14 were specifically developed for Bonelli's Eagle (Mira et al. 2005) and three for Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti (Martinez-Cruz et al. 2002). PCR-amplification was carried out as described by Mira et al. (2005).
Genetic variation
Samples were obtained from 140 different breeding territories (Table 1), with some nests yielding up to two nestling samples in a given year, and some breeding territories yielding nestling samples over several years. The overall sample thus included an unknown proportion of siblings and half-siblings, which might bias the allele frequencies and consequently the statistical estimators (Ruzzante 1998). Because of this, instead of the overall sample (n = 245) we used 10 subsets of individuals from different territories, each with 140 individuals selected by randomly taking a single nestling from each breeding territory. Each genetic analysis was carried out independently for each of the 10 subsets and results were then averaged across the 10 subsets to obtain the overall estimates. Basing analysis on individuals from different territories was judged to overcome eventual bias due to kinship, as preliminary analysis using Queller and Goodnight's (1989) genetic estimate of relatedness, R, and the software spagedi (Hardy & Vekemans 2002), indicated that within each population the mean relatedness between nestlings from different territories was negligible (mean R < 0 for all populations; Table S1), and thus we are confident that our sampling scheme could be used for further genetic analyses.
Average allelic richness, average observed heterozygosity (HO) and unbiased average expected heterozygosity (HE; Nei 1978) were estimated within each subpopulation using genetix 4.05 (Belkhir et al. 2004). Estimates of allelic richness using rarefaction were computed with hp-rare 1.0 (Kalinowski 2005) for a rarefaction size equal to the minimum sample obtained (n = 6; Cyprus and central Spain). Departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within each population was assessed with FIS, estimated with f (Weir & Cockerham 1984), followed by a permutation test (104 permutations) of the null hypothesis of random mating (HO : FIS = 0) implemented in genetix (Belkhir et al. 2004). Linkage disequilibrium was also tested with genetix. To control for multiple comparisons, we used Storey and Tibshirani's (2003) q-value method for estimating the false discovery rates (FDR) from the distribution of P-values. To obtain FDR of 5% in multiple testing, a P-value was considered significant at the 5% level only when the q-value was also ≤ 5% (Storey & Tibshirani 2003).
Population genetic structure
The distribution of individuals among a priori subpopulations was first visualized with factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) implemented in genetix. Levels of differentiation between subpopulations were then quantified with the widely used FST estimator θ (Weir & Cockerham 1984), and significant departures from HO of no differentiation were tested with the permutation (104 permutations) procedure implemented in genetix (Belkhir et al. 2004). To limit bias in this estimator due to a possible unbalanced distribution of polymorphism among populations, we also compared results with those obtained using the Dest (Jost 2008) estimator, corrected for the level of polymorphism, with statistical significance tested using the bootstrap resampling procedure (2 × 104) implemented in the package demetics (Gerlach et al. 2010) for r (R Development Core Team 2012).
Isolation by distance (IBD) was assessed by correlating the pairwise estimates of FST and Dest with geographical distances between subpopulations using the Mantel (1967) test implemented in genetix (104 randomizations). A similar analysis was carried out at the individual level using Queller and Goodnight's (1989) coefficient of relatedness, and relating pairwise relatedness to geographical distances with the permutation procedure (104) implemented in spagedi (Hardy & Vekemans 2002). Because the exact location of many nests was unavailable, distances were always computed considering the geographical centre of each population. Cyprus was excluded from analyses because it was too far away from the remaining populations, whereas Morocco was excluded due to uncertain provenance of individuals.
To examine the extent to which a priori geographically defined subpopulations actually corresponded to genetic units, we used the Bayesian clustering method implemented in structure 2.3.1 (Pritchard et al. 2000, Falush et al. 2003). Analysis assumed the admixture model with α inferred from the data, and correlated allele frequencies with λ = 1 (Falush et al. 2003, Pritchard & Wen 2004), and were based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling with 2 × 105 iterations, following a burn-in period of 105 iterations. Information on the geographical location of individuals was used as recommended by Hubisz et al. (2009), which allows structure to be detected at lower levels of divergence. Ten independent runs of structure were performed for each K-value from one to nine. The optimal number of genetic units (K) was selected by considering for each value of K the log-likelihood given the number of clusters (Ln P(X|K) and the standardized second-order rate ∆K of change of Ln P(X|K) (Evanno et al. 2005). Although the latter approach has been criticized, it may still provide useful estimates when populations deviate from the finite island model, as for instance in the case of hierarchically structured populations (Waples & Gaggiotti 2006).
structure was also run using a hierarchical procedure, to assess whether dominant genetic structure could be hiding fine-scale genetic structure (Evanno et al. 2005). The procedure started by running a first round of structure using the overall sample, and then selecting the optimal number of genetic units using the ∆K approach (Evanno et al. 2005). At this stage, subpopulations clustering as a single genetic unit with membership probability > 0.90 were excluded from further analysis, and a second run of structure was performed on the individuals from each genetic unit including more than one subpopulation. The procedure was repeated until no further subpopulation could be identified as a distinct genetic unit. Outputs of structure were visualized and the Evanno et al. (2005) method implemented using harvester (Earl & vonHoldt 2012).
Recent dispersal
To estimate the recent exchange of individuals between genetic population units identified by structure, we used assignment tests which allocate each individual to the population from which its multilocus genotypes were most likely to be derived (Waser & Strobeck 1998), using arlequin (Excoffier et al. 2005). As sampling was based on nestlings, the population of birth of each individual was known without error. Therefore, assignment of an individual to a population different from the one in which it was sampled was taken to indicate a foreign origin of at least one of its parents.
Recent migration rates (last two generations) were also estimated using the Bayesian approach implemented in bayesass 3.0 (Wilson & Rannala 2003). The program was run using a large number of MCMC iterations (> 107), a burn-in of 106 and a sampling frequency of 103. To ensure consistent and accurate estimates, several runs were started with different random number seeds, and MCMC chains were examined for evidence of convergence and mixing using tracer (Rambaut & Drummond 2004). When there were inconsistent estimates or convergence problems, analyses were repeated using longer runs and by using different random seed numbers.
Results
Properties of microsatellite loci
In total, 123 alleles were detected across 17 microsatellite markers and 245 birds genotyped (Table S2). The number of alleles per locus in the overall sample varied from two to 22, with an average of 7.2 alleles per locus. The observed and expected heterozygosities were the lowest for the populations from southwest Portugal and Cyprus (Table 1). Mean allelic richness was also lowest for these two subpopulations after correcting for differences in sample size (Table 1).
Linkage disequilibrium tested on 136 pairs of loci at the level of each subpopulation only indicated statistically significant departures from independent segregation after correcting for multiple comparisons (FDR < 0.05) in one and seven pairs of loci, for southwest Portugal and eastern Spain, respectively. As the linked loci were inconsistent among populations, these findings suggest statistical rather than physical linkage, and thus all loci were used in subsequent analyses. The only inbreeding coefficient (FIS) significantly different from zero at FDR < 0.05 was found for the population from western Spain (Table 1), suggesting a significant departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Population genetic structure
Factor correspondence analysis highlighted strong differentiation between eastern (Cyprus) and western Mediterranean populations (Fig. 2). In a second analysis that excluded Cyprus, there was evidence of sharp differentiation of Bonelli's Eagles from southwest Portugal, with most individuals occurring in a cluster well separated from the other Iberian and North African populations (Fig. 2). Individuals from the remaining populations clustered close to each other, with some clinal variation apparent from north to south (Fig. 2).

The FST and Dest estimators were highly correlated (r = 0.96, P < 0.001), although Dest-values were consistently larger than FST-values (Table 2). Both estimators pointed to significant differentiation among all subpopulations after correcting for multiple comparisons (FDR < 0.05), particularly between the population from Cyprus and those sampled in the western Mediterranean (Table 2). The subpopulation of southwest Portugal also showed marked differentiation from the remainder, whereas differentiation among the other subpopulations was relatively low, albeit statistically significant for all pairwise comparisons (Table 2).
Population | SWP | NEP | SWSP | WSP | CSP | ESP | MOR | CYP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Southwest Portugal (SWP) | 0.197 ± 0.008a | 0.196 ± 0.006a | 0.167 ± 0.007a | 0.184 ± 0.009a | 0.175 ± 0.005a | 0.175 ± 0.005a | 0.450 ± 0.012a | |
Northeast Portugal (NEP) | 0.125 ± 0.009a | 0.157 ± 0.012a | 0.066 ± 0.007a | 0.116 ± 0.008a | 0.147 ± 0.008a | 0.147 ± 0.008a | 0.436 ± 0.005a | |
Southwest Spain (SWSP) | 0.126 ± 0.007a | 0.088 ± 0.008a | 0.078 ± 0.004a | 0.113 ± 0.004a | 0.064 ± 0.004a | 0.082 ± 0.005a | 0.406 ± 0.007a | |
Western Spain (WSP) | 0.102 ± 0.005a | 0.047 ± 0.004a | 0.040 ± 0.003a | 0.095 ± 0.007a | 0.066 ± 0.005a | 0.099 ± 0.005a | 0.363 ± 0.006a | |
Central Spain (CSP) | 0.141 ± 0.010a | 0.070 ± 0.005a | 0.059 ± 0.003a | 0.043 ± 0.003a | 0.093a | 0.070a | 0.248a | |
Eastern Spain (ESP) | 0.134 ± 0.006a | 0.104 ± 0.006a | 0.041 ± 0.002a | 0.040 ± 0.002a | 0.045a | 0.152a | 0.354a | |
Morocco (MOR) | 0.133 ± 0.010a | 0.075 ± 0.005a | 0.032 ± 0.002a | 0.034 ± 0.003a | 0.062a | 0.043a | 0.393a | |
Cyprus (CYP) | 0.355 ± 0.014a | 0.267 ± 0.004a | 0.260 ± 0.004a | 0.230 ± 0.003a | 0.224a | 0.188a | 0.250a |
- a Statistically significant considering a false discovery rate < 0.05.
Genetic and geographical distances between populations were significantly correlated for both FST (Mantel test: r = 0.56, P = 0.005) and Dest (Mantel test: r = 0.43, P = 0.038) estimators. However, differentiation observed in relation to the subpopulation of southwest Portugal showed consistent positive deviations from the isolation-by-distance trend lines, whereas the opposite was found for comparisons involving the other populations (Fig. 3, Fig. S1). When the population of southwest Portugal was removed from the analysis, there was an increase in the correlation between genetic and geographical distances for both FST (Mantel test: r = 0.66, P = 0.008) and Dest (Mantel test: r = 0.56, P = 0.055), although P-values were larger due to smaller sample sizes. In contrast to analyses at the population level, pairwise relatedness between individuals of different populations was not significantly related to geographical distance (r = 0.054, P > 0.85; Fig. S2).

In the first round of structure, Ln P(X|K) increased up to K = 4 and then levelled off, whereas ∆K peaked for K = 2, although showing a second, smaller peak for K = 4 (Fig. 4). At K = 2, the analysis separated nestlings from southwest Portugal (group membership probability = 0.954) from those of the other seven subpopulations (0.966). At K = 4, the analysis separated the subpopulations of Cyprus and southwest Portugal as clearly distinct genetic units (Fig. 1). The other two clusters were less clearly defined: one cluster included most of the individuals sampled from the coastal Mediterranean regions of Spain and North Africa (Morocco, and southwest and eastern Spain), and the other including most individuals sampled from the central Iberian Peninsula (northern Portugal, and western and central Spain) (Fig. 1). The central Iberian group included about 20% of the genotypes from the coastal Mediterranean group, particularly from southwest and eastern Spain, but the opposite was not observed (Fig. 1). A second round of analyses excluding southwest Portugal returned K = 3 (Fig. S3), confirming the separation of Cyprus, central Iberian and coastal Mediterranean subpopulations. The third round of analysis excluding Cyprus returned K = 2, separating the central Iberian and coastal Mediterranean subpopulations (Fig. S4).

Recent dispersal
In assignment tests, all nestlings from southwest Portugal and Cyprus were assigned to their subpopulation of origin, thus indicating that their parents were also from the same subpopulations. Furthermore, no nestling sampled from a different subpopulation was assigned to either southwest Portugal or Cyprus, thus pointing to few or no recent exchanges of individuals from these subpopulations with other subpopulations. In contrast, there was evidence of recent movements between the coastal Mediterranean and central Iberian populations, with 1.8% of the nestlings sampled in the former assigned to the latter, and 6.1% of those sampled in the latter assigned to the former. Foreign assignments were mostly recorded in the subpopulation from western Spain.
Inferences on recent migration rates using bayesass could not be drawn, as there were inconsistencies among runs and the analysis did not converge. Detailed analysis of the sampling of the MCMC chains using tracer indicated that bayesass was particularly poor in resolving directional migration rates between coastal Mediterranean and central Iberian subpopulations, with posterior probability distributions often showing bimodality.
Discussion
This study revealed moderate genetic differentiation between western and eastern Mediterranean subpopulations of the Bonelli's Eagle, which are separated by geographical distances well beyond the known dispersal range of individuals (Real & Mañosa 2001, Balbontín & Ferrer 2009, Cadahía et al. 2009, 2010). Within the western Mediterranean, there was weak to moderate differentiation among subpopulations located relatively close to each other, which is inconsistent with earlier views that dispersal is pronounced and essentially unconstrained by distance (Soutullo et al. 2008). Instead, the observed levels of differentiation and the pattern of isolation by distance are consistent with the presence of distance-dependent dispersal. This is also supported by the detection of very few recent migrants, which originated primarily from neighbouring subpopulations. Although distance seemed to constrain dispersal, gene flow appeared to be sufficiently high to preclude major differentiation in the metapopulation system. Nonetheless, the pronounced differentiation of the southwest Portugal population is consistent with the expectation of a particularly reduced gene flow in geographically peripheral subpopulations. Our findings are in line with other studies suggesting that population subdivision may have negative consequences, even for species with a very high dispersal capacity, which may be most pronounced in the case in small and geographically isolated subpopulations (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, Alcaide et al. 2009).
Spatial population structure: current vs. historical processes
The current patterns of genetic structure observed in western Mediterranean Bonelli's Eagles may be a consequence of a long-standing pattern of distance-dependent dispersal or may be due to recent anthropogenic habitat fragmentation coupled with demographic decline and genetic drift (e.g. Martínez-Cruz et al. 2007). Although there is at present little evidence to support either hypothesis, the information available suggests that historical rather than recent processes may underlie the patterns observed. First, although many Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations suffered a marked demographic decline, those analysed in the present study showed no evidence of genetic bottlenecks (Mira 2006), probably because the population reduction was recent, the population size remained relatively high and the species’ long generation time provided a buffer against the genetic effects of population fluctuations (Hailer et al. 2006, Brown et al. 2007). Secondly, there is no evidence for recent reductions in population connectivity, as no major changes in the range and spatial configuration of Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations have been reported during recent decades (Del Moral 2006). Thirdly, in comparable long-lived species, for instance the Spanish Imperial Eagle, genetic structure resulting from anthropogenic processes was associated with demographic declines and fragmentation levels that were older and far more pronounced than those observed in Bonelli's Eagle (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, 2007). Despite this, it cannot be ruled out that recent anthropogenic processes affected contemporary genetic structure, particularly in small and peripheral populations that are prone to genetic drift (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, 2007, Alcaide et al. 2009). Clarifying these issues would require a more detailed analysis of the demographic trend and history of Bonelli's Eagle (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2007).
Distance-dependent dispersal was inferred from the pattern of isolation by distance among Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations, and by the observation that recent migrants were few in each subpopulation and originated primarily from neighbouring subpopulations. In contrast, pairwise relatedness between individuals sampled in different subpopulations was not correlated with distance, but this was probably because their true relatedness was inevitably low (they could at most be cousins, i.e. born from two brothers breeding in different subpopulations), and because kinship estimates based solely on genetic data are often imprecise (Van Horn et al. 2008). Taken together, these results are consistent with mark-recapture and satellite tracking studies pointing to a high degree of natal philopatry in the Bonelli's Eagle, with most individuals breeding within or close to their natal subpopulation (Cheylan et al. 1996, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010), despite the occurrence of a few recruitment events hundreds of kilometres from the individual's birthplace (Cheylan et al. 1996, Balbontín & Ferrer 2009, Cadahía et al. 2009, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010). These long-distance recruitments are likely to have precluded strong divergence among subpopulations, although they were probably sufficiently rare to maintain the observed levels of genetic differentiation and isolation by distance (Wright 1943, Kimura & Maruyama 1971) as observed in other philopatric species with high mobility (Alcaide et al. 2009, Barlow et al. 2011).
The hypothesis of philopatry contributing to maintain small to moderate levels of genetic differentiation between spatially disjunct subpopulations is not incompatible with the apparent homogeneity of the mitochondrial control region in western Mediterranean Bonelli's Eagles (Cadahía et al. 2007), as differences between the patterns derived from mtDNA and microsatellites are widespread in birds (e.g. Brito 2007, Hull et al. 2008b). Female-biased dispersal in Bonelli's Eagle (Hernández-Matías et al. 2010) might have contributed to homogenized allele frequencies of maternally inherited mitochondrial markers over large geographical regions, while retaining the signature of distance-dependent dispersal in autosomal markers. It is more likely, however, that failure to detect spatial structure was due to the low diversity (four haplotypes) of this marker, reducing the statistical power to detect genetic differentiation. As gene flow among populations appeared to be moderate, genetic structure was probably only detectable at the fine resolution allowed by a large number of microsatellites.
Geographical population configuration: effect on genetic diversity and gene flow
Geographical patterns of population configuration also seemed to play a role in the genetic patterns observed, probably because they resulted in some clusters of populations exchanging individuals more often among themselves than with other clusters. This was the case of subpopulations located along the Mediterranean coastal regions of the Iberian Peninsula (southwest and northeastern Spain) and northwestern Africa (Morocco), which are close to each other and emerged as a consistent genetic unit in the structure analyses. This clustering suggests that there may be some exchange of individuals across the Mediterranean, although larger sample sizes from northwest Africa would be needed to confirm this hypothesis. Although this exchange has not been directly observed (Cheylan et al. 1996, Real & Mañosa 2001, Balbontín & Ferrer 2009, Cadahía et al. 2009, 2010, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010), it should be expected given the close proximity of subpopulations on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar. Another genetic cluster emerging from the structure analyses included most individuals from northeast Portugal, and western and central Spain. In this central Iberian cluster there was a significant representation of genotypes from the Mediterranean cluster, most pronounced in the populations of central and, to a far lesser extent, western Spain. This pattern is suggestive of an asymmetrical exchange of individuals between the two clusters. Asymmetrical migration was supported by assignment tests and is in line with recent metapopulation models suggesting that the Bonelli's Eagle population in southwest Spain is a source of colonists for western and central Spain (A. Hernández-Matías pers. comm.). Unfortunately, this pattern could not be explored further due to the unreliable estimates of recent migration rates provided by bayesass, possibly because the estimation method fails when genetic differentiation is too low and migration rates are too high (Faubet et al. 2007).
The geographical position of the small subpopulation of southwest Portugal (< 20 breeding females in 1990; Beja & Palma 2008), in the periphery of the species’ core range, probably contributed to its low genetic diversity and high divergence in relation to other subpopulations. These patterns are consistent with the expectations of increased genetic drift and reduced gene flow in small and peripheral subpopulations in a metapopulation system (Eckert et al. 2008), as already observed for other birds of prey with high movement capabilities (Martínez-Cruz et al. 2004, 2007, Alcaide et al. 2009). It is noteworthy that similar patterns of high genetic divergence from the remaining populations of the Iberian Peninsula have been reported for a range of vertebrates inhabiting southwest Portugal, some of which have been recognized as highly circumscribed endemic taxa (e.g. Mesquita et al. 2005, Godinho et al. 2008, Gonçalves et al. 2009). Divergence of these populations is generally associated with the emergence of the Caldeirão Mountains in the Early Pliocene (3.4–5.3 Ma) (Gonçalves et al. 2009), which is probably much older than the process promoting genetic divergence of the Bonelli's Eagle subpopulations inhabiting the same region, as suggested by its lack of mtDNA differentiation (Cadahía et al. 2007). In both instances it may be argued that the remote geographical position of these mountains, located at the southwesternmost tip of the Iberian Peninsula and thus partially surrounded by the sea, and the relatively large gap between it and other mountain ranges with comparable environmental conditions, may be factors limiting gene flow and thus promoting genetic differentiation even in the case of a highly mobile species. Clearly, it would be interesting to investigate whether similar patterns of genetic differentiation occur in other bird species that also show rather isolated populations in the same region.
Together with the effects of small population size and peripheral geographical position, ecological divergence may also have played a role in the genetic pattern observed in Bonelli's Eagles from southwest Portugal, as suggested for other wide-ranging species (Stenseth et al. 2004, Musiani et al. 2007, Sacks et al. 2008), including birds of prey (Hull et al. 2008a). The subpopulation of southwest Portugal is ecologically unique in that individuals nest largely in trees (Palma et al. 2006), whereas individuals in other subpopulations nest predominantly on cliffs (Carrascal & Seoane 2009b). In these circumstances, an eventual behavioural imprinting to the natal nest type might contribute to non-random dispersal (Davis & Stamps 2004) and thus to some reproductive isolation between ecotypes (Beltman & Metz 2005). Restricted dispersal between populations with contrasting nest-site selection patterns has long been hypothesized in birds of prey (Fox 1995), particularly in the case of cliff- and tree-nesting Peregrine Falcons Falco peregrinus (e.g. Wegner et al. 2005). This hypothesis requires further testing because in birds of prey, the extent of imprinting to the fledging site may vary widely (e.g. Tordoff et al. 1998, Mannan et al. 2006, Rutz 2008), and the information available to support a link between nesting habitat divergence and reproductive isolation remains scarce and ambiguous (Nesje et al. 2000, Hull et al. 2008a, Riegert et al. 2010).
Conservation implications
Despite recent positive trends in some subpopulations, the conservation of Bonelli's Eagle remains a high priority (Del Moral 2006). Findings from this study confirm the view that management of Bonelli's Eagles should assume a metapopulation structure (Real & Mañosa 1997, Soutullo et al. 2008), with distance-dependent dispersal between spatially discrete subpopulations, and occasional recruitment hundreds of kilometres from an individual's natal site (Cheylan et al. 1996, Cadahía et al. 2009, Hernández-Matías et al. 2010). Furthermore, the study suggests that the geographical scale of this metapopulation may be larger than usually assumed (Real & Mañosa 1997, Soutullo et al. 2008), given the possible exchange of individuals between the Iberian Peninsula and northwestern Africa. These results have fundamental consequences for the development of demographic models, and thus to the design of conservation management strategies. For instance, the assumption of an equal probability of individuals dispersing to any subpopulation, including the natal one, was incorporated into a recent metapopulation model for the Bonelli's Eagle, which suggested that pre-adult mortality plays a key role in determining overall population trends (Soutullo et al. 2008). This result is in marked contrast to earlier demographic models that assumed local subpopulations to be isolated, concluding that adult mortality had the largest impact on population growth rate (Real & Mañosa 1997). The two results have explicit conservation implications, because adult and pre-adult Bonelli's Eagles often have disjunct spatial distributions and require distinct management actions (Real et al. 2001, Cadahía et al. 2010). New modelling studies focusing on the entire Bonelli's Eagle metapopulation and accounting for distance-dependent dispersal are thus needed to strengthen conservation prescriptions.
The association of high genetic and ecological divergence in Bonelli's Eagles from southwest Portugal merits particular attention due to the conservation implications. This is one of the few subpopulations in western Europe that is increasing and expanding into neighbouring regions (Beja & Palma 2008), with preliminary mark-recapture and genetic data suggesting that individuals from this population are occupying forested and agricultural landscapes that would be unavailable to cliff-nesting individuals (L. Palma, P. Beja, R. Godinho & N. Ferrand unpubl. data). This population may therefore need to be regarded as a distinct management unit, although further research is required to assess the extent to which ecological divergence is actually contributing to reduce gene flow with the other, cliff-nesting, populations (Crandall et al. 2000, Fraser & Bernatchez 2001).
This study was partly supported by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT), through project PRAXIS/BIA/132/96 and a PhD grant to S.M. (SFRH/BD/3163/2000). Eagle nestlings were handled with permission from the authorities of each country. We are grateful for help with collecting Bonelli's Eagle samples from Bárbara Fráguas, Carlos de La Cruz, Ernesto Ferreiro, Juan Negro, Luis Cadahía, Savvas Iezequiel and Ursula Höfle, help with data analysis by Mário Ferreira, and critical reading of the manuscript by Joan Real, Christian Rutz, Benjamin Sacks, Hugo Rebelo, Rauri Bowie, Jérôme Fuchs and three anonymous referees.