Volume 24, Issue 2 pp. 154-164
Original Article

Waiting list management practices for home-care occupational therapy in the province of Quebec, Canada

Marie-Hélène Raymond OT M.Sc.

Corresponding Author

Marie-Hélène Raymond OT M.Sc.

School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence

Marie-Hélène Raymond

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine

Université de Montréal

C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville

Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Louise Demers OT Ph.D.

Louise Demers OT Ph.D.

School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Research Center, Institut Universitaire de gératrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Debbie E. Feldman pht Ph.D.

Debbie E. Feldman pht Ph.D.

School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Direction of Public Health of Montreal, Health Services and Population Health Team, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Greater Montreal Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 February 2015
Citations: 27

Abstract

Referral prioritisation is commonly used in home-based occupational therapy to minimise the negative impacts of waiting, but this practice is not standardised. This may lead to inequities in access to care, especially for clients considered as low priority, who tend to bear the brunt of lengthy waiting lists. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe waiting list management practices targeting low-priority clients in home-based occupational therapy in the province of Quebec, Canada, and to investigate the association between these practices and the length of the waiting list. A structured telephone interview was conducted in 2012–2013 with the person who manages the occupational therapy waiting list in 55 home care programmes across Quebec. Questions pertained to strategies aimed at servicing low-priority clients, the date of the oldest referral and the number of clients waiting. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. The median wait time for the oldest referral was 18 months (range: 2–108 months). A variety of strategies were used to service low-priority clients. Programmes that used no strategies to service low-priority clients (n = 16) had longer wait times (P < 0.0001) and a greater number of people on the waiting list (P = 0.006) compared with programmes that applied a maximum wait time target (n = 12). In conclusion, diverse strategies exist to allocate services to low-priority clients in home-based occupational therapy programmes. However, in programmes where none of these strategies are used, low-priority clients may be denied access to services indefinitely.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.