Volume 65, Issue 1 pp. 45-50
Original Article

Margin status of the vas deferens in radical prostatectomy specimens: relevant or waste of time?

Matthias Saar

Corresponding Author

Matthias Saar

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Both authors contributed equally to the study.

Address for correspondence: M Saar, MD, Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jörn Kamradt

Jörn Kamradt

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Sauer

Christian Sauer

Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Stöckle

Michael Stöckle

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Rainer Grobholz

Rainer Grobholz

Department of Pathology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany

Department of Pathology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland

Both authors contributed equally to the study.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 January 2014
Citations: 2

Abstract

Aims

Positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy are of great interest, but investigation of the vas deferens (VD) is not recommended. This study examined the VD margins in radical prostatectomy patients to report the incidence of PSM and their clinical staging.

Methods and results

A total of 2701 consecutive specimens (1995–2009) were reviewed for tumour infiltration of the VD margin and correlated with clinicopathological data. Forty-one of 2701 cases (1.5%) had a positive VD margin. Thirteen cases had bilateral infiltration. All tumours were locally advanced [pT3a (= 1), pT3b (= 34), pT4 (= 6)]; 15 (37%) had lymph node metastases. While Gleason scores ranged from 7 to 9, mean PSA was 22.3 ng/ml (1.68–127 ng/ml). In all cases with seminal vesicle infiltration (40 of 41) the PSM of the VD was seen ipsilaterally. In 11 of 15 patients (73%) with pN1 status, seminal vesicle infiltration and PSM of the VD were seen on the same side. In 16 cases (39%) the VD was the only PSM.

Conclusions

A PSM of the VD is an infrequent finding, but might appear as the only PSM. Histological evaluation of the VD therefore seems reasonable, especially as biochemical recurrence has been reported with positive VD margins, and awareness of them might assist in making clinical decisions for adjuvant therapy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.