Volume 53, Issue 10 pp. 895-959
SPECIAL RESEARCH REPORT
Open Access

Report of the 23rd nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan (2014–2015)

Hiroko Iijima

Hiroko Iijima

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masatoshi Kudo

Corresponding Author

Masatoshi Kudo

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence

Masatoshi Kudo, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Shoji Kubo

Shoji Kubo

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masayuki Kurosaki

Masayuki Kurosaki

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Gastroenterology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Michiie Sakamoto

Michiie Sakamoto

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shuichiro Shiina

Shuichiro Shiina

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Ryosuke Tateishi

Ryosuke Tateishi

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Nakashima Osamu

Nakashima Osamu

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takumi Fukumoto

Takumi Fukumoto

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yutaka Matsuyama

Yutaka Matsuyama

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takamichi Murakami

Takamichi Murakami

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Arata Takahashi

Arata Takahashi

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

National Clinical Database, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroaki Miyata

Hiroaki Miyata

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

National Clinical Database, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Norihiro Kokudo

Norihiro Kokudo

Follow-up Survey Committee, Japan Liver Cancer Association, Osaka, Japan

National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 August 2023
Citations: 5

Abstract

For the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 20 889 newly registered patients and 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 516 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 23rd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 22nd survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, Child–Pugh grade, or albumin-bilirubin grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer in the world.

Abbreviations

  • AFP
  • α-fetoprotein
  • ALBI
  • albumin-bilirubin
  • BMI
  • body mass index
  • CR
  • complete response
  • DEB
  • drug-eluting bead
  • HAIC
  • hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy
  • HCC
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • ICC
  • intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
  • JIS
  • Japan Integrated Staging
  • OS
  • overall survival
  • PIVKA-II
  • protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II
  • PD
  • progressive disease
  • PR
  • partial response
  • RECICL
  • Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver
  • RFA
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • SD
  • stable disease
  • TACE
  • transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
  • Vp4
  • tumor invasion in the main trunk of the portal vein
  • Vv3
  • tumor invasion in the main trunk of the hepatic vein/inferior vena cava
  • INTRODUCTION

    The Japan Liver Cancer Association (formerly Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan) has worked to advance the study and treatment of liver cancer since 1969, carrying out 22 national surveys on primary liver cancer with institutional members and collaborating institutions across Japan based on its General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer,1-11 and publishing the official results of those surveys and original article using this database.12-54, 55-97, 98-107 The group also reports on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver.108-117 Recently, the Japan Liver Cancer Association also published clinical practice guidelines for intrahepatic cholangitis carcinoma.107

    This report presents the results of the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, with data obtained for 20 889 newly registered patients from 516 institutions across Japan over the 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. It also includes data obtained for 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients. Epidemiological, clinicopathological, diagnostic, and treatment-related data were compiled for newly registered patients. The median overall survival (OS) and cumulative survival rates by tumor diameter, number of tumors, histological type, background characteristics, hepatic functional reserve, and treatments were also calculated for patients previously registered in the 18th to 23rd surveys during 2004 to 2015.

    This special report is a concise version of the original full report published in Japanese.106

    PATIENTS AND METHODS

    Basic statistics

    The participants of this survey were patients who were hospitalized, underwent outpatient treatment, or underwent autopsy for primary liver cancer at 516 collaborating institutions across Japan during the 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, and who underwent treatment at institutions that had entered patient data for survey items created by the Follow-up Survey Committee of the Japan Liver Cancer Association (formerly Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan; Chair of Head Office: Masatoshi Kudo) into the National Clinical Database. A total of 20 889 patients were newly registered during this period. When imaging/clinical diagnosis, histopathological diagnosis, and histopathological diagnosis determined by autopsy were not consistent, precedence was given to the autopsy result when available and the histopathological diagnosis otherwise. The histological type was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 90.1% of patients, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in 6.9%, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and ICC) in 1.3% (Table 1). The results for patients newly registered in this survey were tabulated. Patients with missing data for a given parameter were excluded from tabulation for that parameter. The abbreviations used in the table are based on the Fifth Revised Edition of the General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer.6

    TABLE 1. Primary liver cancer diagnosed clinically and/or histopathologically.
    Men Women Total
    Histological type (n = 14 745) (n = 6108) (n = 20 853)
    Hepatocellular carcinoma 13 444 5346 18 790 (90.1%)
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 896 552 1448 (6.9%)
    Cholangiolocellular carcinoma 70 49 119 (0.6%)
    Biliary cystadenocarcinoma 7 5 12 (0.1%)
    Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma 188 75 263 (1.3%)
    Hepatoblastoma 4 2 6 (0.0%)
    Undifferentiated carcinoma 10 4 14 (0.1%)
    Other 126 75 201 (1.0%)

    OS and cumulative survival rate

    Median OS, which was defined as the period from the dates of diagnosis to any cause of death, and cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, ICC, and combined HCC and ICC by tumor characteristics, treatment, and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death (excluding lost to follow-up). Cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by treatment (hepatectomy, local ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization [TACE], hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC], and systemic therapy [molecular targeted therapy]). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups.

    These median OS and cumulative survival rate calculations were made without censoring any deaths, including those in the “Other” category.

    RESULTS

    1. Basic statistics

    Causes of death of newly enrolled patients during the survey period

    The mortality rate during the survey period for newly enrolled patients with HCC was 13.7% (2458 patients). The cause of death was cancer for 60.3%, liver failure for 13.6%, gastrointestinal hemorrhage for 1.0%, and rupture of gastro-esophageal varices for 2.0%. The surgical mortality was 0.9% (22 patients), giving a surgical mortality rate of 0.3% among the 7981 patients who underwent surgery. The mortality rate for newly enrolled patients with ICC was 31.8% (449 patients). The cause of death was cancer for 81.7% and liver failure for 3.3% (Table 2).

    TABLE 2. Prognosis.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Surviving patients 13 271 809 170
    Deaths from all causes 2458 449 65
    Liver cancer 1483 (60.3%) 367 (81.7%) 52 (80.0%)
    Liver failure 334 (13.6%) 15 (3.3%) 8 (12.3%)
    Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 25 (1.0%) 2 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%)
    Rupture of esophageal/gastric varices 49 (2.0%) 1 (0.2%) 2 (3.1%)
    Intraperitoneal hemorrhage due to tumor rupture 56 (2.3%) 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
    Surgery 22 (0.9%) 5 (1.1%) 1 (1.5%)
    Other 315 (12.8%) 25 (5.6%) 0 (0.0%)
    Unknown 174 (7.1%) 33 (7.3%) 2 (3.1%)
    Survival status unknown 2239 154 21
    Total 17 968 1412 256

    Past medical history

    The proportions of patients with a history of transfusions and a history of excessive alcohol use were 19.2% and 27.8% for HCC, and 8.4% and 16.9% for ICC, respectively. The proportion with hypertension was 50.9% for HCC and 48.4% for ICC, and the proportion with diabetes was 33.7% for HCC and 22.9% for ICC. The proportion with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 was 31.0% for HCC and 21.8% for ICC. The proportion with severe obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) was 5.6% for HCC and 3.0% for ICC.

    Clinical and imaging diagnosis

    The mean age of men and women at clinical diagnosis of primary liver cancer was 70.0 and 74.0 years for HCC, and 70.0 and 70.0 years for ICC, respectively. The ratio of male to female patients was 2.51:1 for HCC and 1.62:1 for ICC.

    The liver damage grade at diagnosis of HCC was A in 65.6%, B in 28.9%, and C in 5.5% of patients. The Child–Pugh grade was A in 76.6%, B in 19.9%, and C in 3.4% of patients. The modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI grade) was 1 in 27.4%, 2a in 23.9%, 2b in 36.8%, and 3 in 11.9% of patients. Serum albumin was measured by the bromocresol green method in 21.5%, and the modified bromocresol purple method in 78.5% of patients (Table 3).

    TABLE 3. Clinical diagnosis (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Evidence for diagnosis (multiple choices allowed) (n = 34 864) (n = 3008) (n = 538)
    CT 15 025 1269 228
    MRI 8202 643 122
    Ultrasound 5667 515 82
    Contrast ultrasound 1549 74 13
    Angiography 1542 53 22
    Pathology 879 270 39
    AngioCT 1622 50 25
    Other 378 134 7
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Evidence for diagnosis (whether dynamic study was performed) when diagnostic modality was “CT” or “MRI” (n = 15 992) (n = 1139) (n = 222)
    Performed 15 992 (100.0%) 1139 (100.0%) 222 (100.0%)
    Performance status (n = 17 192) (n = 1341) (n = 246)
    PS0 12 658 (73.6%) 886 (66.1%) 186 (75.6%)
    PS1 3000 (17.4%) 249 (18.6%) 34 (13.8%)
    PS2 905 (5.3%) 124 (9.2%) 16 (6.5%)
    PS3 461 (2.7%) 57 (4.3%) 8 (3.3%)
    PS4 168 (1.0%) 25 (1.9%) 2 (0.8%)
    Encephalopathy (n = 18 431) (n = 1403) (n = 261)
    None 18 006 (97.7%) 1394 (99.4%) 258 (98.9%)
    Mild 344 (1.9%) 7 (0.5%) 2 (0.8%)
    Moderate-to-severe 81 (0.4%) 2 (0.1%) 1 (0.4%)
    Ascites (n = 18 395) (n = 1397) (n = 261)
    None 16 335 (88.8%) 1286 (92.1%) 239 (91.6%)
    Responded to treatment 1146 (6.2%) 24 (1.7%) 9 (3.4%)
    Refractory to treatment 914 (5.0%) 87 (6.2%) 13 (5.0%)
    Serum bilirubin (mg/dL) (n = 18 610) (n = 1432) (n = 261)
    0.0∼0.9 11 608 (62.4%) 989 (69.1%) 160 (61.3%)
    1.0∼1.9 5644 (30.3%) 278 (19.4%) 79 (30.3%)
    2.0∼3.0 840 (4.5%) 43 (3.0%) 14 (5.4%)
    ≥3.1 518 (2.8%) 122 (8.5%) 8 (3.1%)
    Serum albumin (g/dL) (n = 18 559) (n = 1425) (n = 261)
    <2.8 1333 (7.2%) 92 (6.5%) 15 (5.7%)
    2.8∼2.9 780 (4.2%) 38 (2.7%) 8 (3.1%)
    3.0∼3.5 4267 (23.0%) 249 (17.5%) 51 (19.5%)
    >3.5 12 179 (65.6%) 1046 (73.4%) 187 (71.6%)
    Method of albumin measurement (n = 14 171) (n = 1087) (n = 189)
    BCG 3043 (21.5%) 232 (21.3%) 37 (19.6%)
    Modified BCP 11 128 (78.5%) 855 (78.7%) 152 (80.4%)
    ICG R15 [%] (n = 9623) (n = 811) (n = 179)
    ≤14 4880 (50.7%) 632 (77.9%) 110 (61.5%)
    15∼24 2595 (27.0%) 135 (16.6%) 38 (21.2%)
    25∼40 1452 (15.1%) 37 (4.6%) 25 (14.0%)
    >40 696 (7.2%) 7 (0.9%) 6 (3.4%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: AngioCT, computed tomography angiography; BCG, bromocresol green; BCP, bromocresol purple; CT, computed tomography; ICGR15, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PS, performance status.

    In HCC, serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) was <10 ng/mL in 44.3%, 10–199 ng/mL in 34.7%, and ≥200 ng/mL in 21.0% of patients. Lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein was <10% in 66.5%, 10%–14.9% in 5.7%, and ≥15% in 27.8% of patients. Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II was <40 mAU/mL in 37.9%, 40–99 mAU/mL in 14.4%, and ≥100 mAU/mL in 47.7% of patients. In ICC, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was <5.0 ng/mL in 58.5%, 5.0–9.9 ng/mL in 16.7%, and ≥10 ng/mL in 24.8% of patients. CA19-9 was <37 U/mL in 35.4%, 37–99 U/mL in 15.0%, and ≥ 100 U/mL in 49.6% of patients (Tables 4 and 5).

    TABLE 4. Clinical diagnosis (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Prothrombin activity (%) (n = 17 901) (n = 1331) (n = 250)
    <40 443 (2.5%) 45 (3.4%) 5 (2.0%)
    40∼49 357 (2.0%) 17 (1.3%) 3 (1.2%)
    50∼70 2981 (16.7%) 127 (9.5%) 35 (14.0%)
    71∼80 3340 (18.7%) 166 (12.5%) 52 (20.8%)
    >80 10 780 (60.2%) 976 (73.3%) 155 (62.0%)
    Prothrombin time (INR) (n = 17 872) (n = 1336) (n = 249)
    ≤1.20 14 649 (82.0%) 1181 (88.4%) 215 (86.3%)
    1.21∼1.30 1707 (9.6%) 79 (5.9%) 18 (7.2%)
    1.31∼1.50 967 (5.4%) 36 (2.7%) 11 (4.4%)
    1.51∼1.80 303 (1.7%) 25 (1.9%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥1.81 246 (1.4%) 15 (1.1%) 5 (2.0%)
    Platelets (×104/mm3) (n = 18 601) (n = 1427) (n = 261)
    <3.0 100 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    3.0∼4.9 546 (2.9%) 7 (0.5%) 6 (2.3%)
    5.0∼9.9 4280 (23.0%) 62 (4.3%) 36 (13.8%)
    10.0∼14.9 5495 (29.5%) 234 (16.4%) 65 (24.9%)
    15.0∼19.9 4202 (22.6%) 376 (26.3%) 76 (29.1%)
    20.0∼99.9 3883 (20.9%) 743 (52.1%) 77 (29.5%)
    ≥100 95 (0.5%) 5 (0.4%) 1 (0.4%)
    Serum creatinine (mg/dL) (n = 18 346) (n = 1420) (n = 257)
    <1.0 14 517 (79.1%) 1171 (82.5%) 210 (81.7%)
    ≥1.0, <2.0 3218 (17.5%) 217 (15.3%) 39 (15.2%)
    ≥2.0, <3.0 205 (1.1%) 6 (0.4%) 2 (0.8%)
    ≥3.0 406 (2.2%) 26 (1.8%) 6 (2.3%)
    Child–Pugh grade (n = 17 683) (n = 1285) (n = 248)
    A 13 550 (76.6%) 1004 (78.1%) 202 (81.5%)
    B 3526 (19.9%) 235 (18.3%) 38 (15.3%)
    C 607 (3.4%) 46 (3.6%) 8 (3.2%)
    mALBI grade (n = 18 540) (n = 1422) (n = 261)
    1 5085 (27.4%) 512 (36.0%) 90 (34.5%)
    2a 4439 (23.9%) 345 (24.3%) 64 (24.5%)
    2b 6814 (36.8%) 388 (27.3%) 85 (32.6%)
    3 2202 (11.9%) 177 (12.4%) 22 (8.4%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: INR, international normalized ratio; mALBI, modified albumin-bilirubin.
    TABLE 5. Clinical diagnosis (3).
    AFP (ng/mL) (n = 18 137) (n = 1017) (n = 243)
    <10 8035 (44.3%) 839 (82.5%) 89 (36.6%)
    ≤199 6286 (34.7%) 142 (14.0%) 78 (32.1%)
    ≤399 745 (4.1%) 7 (0.7%) 12 (4.9%)
    ≤999 823 (4.5%) 9 (0.9%) 14 (5.8%)
    ≤9999 1251 (6.9%) 17 (1.7%) 34 (14.0%)
    ≤99 999 727 (4.0%) 2 (0.2%) 15 (6.2%)
    ≥100 000 270 (1.5%) 1 (0.1%) 1 (0.4%)
    AFP-L3 (%) (n = 9144) (n = 300) (n = 122)
    <5.0 4697 (51.4%) 209 (69.7%) 36 (29.5%)
    <10.0 1382 (15.1%) 23 (7.7%) 10 (8.2%)
    ≤14.9 519 (5.7%) 6 (2.0%) 5 (4.1%)
    ≤19.9 305 (3.3%) 5 (1.7%) 7 (5.7%)
    ≥20.0 2241 (24.5%) 57 (19.0%) 64 (52.5%)
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) (n = 17 525) (n = 841) (n = 231)
    <40 6635 (37.9%) 690 (82.0%) 108 (46.8%)
    ≤99 2523 (14.4%) 55 (6.5%) 27 (11.7%)
    ≤299 2258 (12.9%) 31 (3.7%) 28 (12.1%)
    ≤499 773 (4.4%) 10 (1.2%) 10 (4.3%)
    ≤999 923 (5.3%) 14 (1.7%) 12 (5.2%)
    ≤2999 1292 (7.4%) 8 (1.0%) 18 (7.8%)
    ≤9999 1143 (6.5%) 11 (1.3%) 8 (3.5%)
    ≥10 000 1978 (11.3%) 22 (2.6%) 20 (8.7%)
    CEA (ng/mL) (n = 9831) (n = 1327) (n = 199)
    <2.5 3214 (32.7%) 361 (27.2%) 63 (31.7%)
    ≤4.9 4109 (41.8%) 415 (31.3%) 69 (34.7%)
    ≤9.9 2002 (20.4%) 222 (16.7%) 35 (17.6%)
    ≤19.9 366 (3.7%) 105 (7.9%) 16 (8.0%)
    ≤49.9 83 (0.8%) 83 (6.3%) 8 (4.0%)
    ≤99.9 21 (0.2%) 46 (3.5%) 2 (1.0%)
    ≥100 36 (0.4%) 95 (7.2%) 6 (3.0%)
    CA19-9 (U/mL) (n = 8731) (n = 1301) (n = 189)
    <37 6777 (77.6%) 461 (35.4%) 104 (55.0%)
    ≤99 1430 (16.4%) 195 (15.0%) 32 (16.9%)
    ≤299 390 (4.5%) 147 (11.3%) 19 (10.1%)
    ≤999 74 (0.8%) 147 (11.3%) 16 (8.5%)
    ≤2999 38 (0.4%) 117 (9.0%) 9 (4.8%)
    ≤9999 11 (0.1%) 98 (7.5%) 5 (2.6%)
    ≥10 000 11 (0.1%) 136 (10.5%) 4 (2.1%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein; CA 19–9, carbohydrate antigen 19–9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II.

    The hepatitis  B surface antigen-positive rate was 13.3% for HCC, 6.3% for ICC, and 21.0% for combined HCC and ICC. The hepatitis C virus antibody-positive rate was 45.6% for HCC, 13.1% for ICC, and 32.0% for combined HCC and ICC (Tables 6 and 7). The proportion of patients with hepatitis B who underwent nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy before developing HCC and achieved undetectable HBV DNA or biochemical response was 85.4%. The proportion of patients who underwent therapy for hepatitis C before developing HCC and achieved a sustained virological response (with unknown response treated as no response) was 45.3% (Table 7). Tumor diameter on imaging at diagnosis was ≤2 cm in 32.6% and 2.1–5.0 cm in 42.8% of patients with HCC. For ICC, these figures were 13.9% and 46.4%. The proportion of patients with unifocal disease was 66.0% for HCC and 79.0% for ICC. Tumor staining was observed in 93.0% and washout in 90.4% of HCC patients. Vascular invasion was observed in the portal vein in 13.1%, hepatic veins in 6.9%, and bile duct in 4.1% of HCC patients. Tumor rupture was observed in 2.6%, and F2 and larger/red color sign (+) esophageal or gastric varices were observed in 28.3% of HCC patients (Tables 8 and 9).

    TABLE 6. Hepatitis B virus-related markers and viral load.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    HBsAg (n = 17 799) (n = 1362) (n = 257)
    Negative 15 424 (86.7%) 1276 (93.7%) 203 (79.0%)
    Positive 2367 (13.3%) 86 (6.3%) 54 (21.0%)
    Equivocal (±) 8 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    HBsAb (n = 8060) (n = 545) (n = 123)
    Negative 6295 (78.1%) 413 (75.8%) 99 (80.5%)
    Positive 1741 (21.6%) 130 (23.9%) 24 (19.5%)
    Equivocal (±) 24 (0.3%) 2 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%)
    HBcAb (n = 8527) (n = 517) (n = 127)
    Negative 4534 (53.2%) 311 (60.2%) 63 (49.6%)
    Positive 3977 (46.6%) 206 (39.8%) 64 (50.4%)
    Equivocal (±) 16 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    HBeAg (n = 3893) (n = 238) (n = 82)
    Negative 3513 (90.2%) 228 (95.8%) 71 (86.6%)
    Positive 379 (9.7%) 10 (4.2%) 11 (13.4%)
    Equivocal (±) 1 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    HBeAb (n = 3750) (n = 222) (n = 79)
    Negative 2157 (57.5%) 159 (71.6%) 40 (50.6%)
    Positive 1586 (42.3%) 63 (28.4%) 39 (49.4%)
    Equivocal (±) 7 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    HBV DNA load
    TMA (n = 2442) (n = 161) (n = 53)
    Below detectable levels 2280 (93.4%) 156 (96.9%) 44 (83.0%)
    <3.7 LGE/mL 72 (2.9%) 3 (1.9%) 4 (7.5%)
    3.7–3.9 LGE/mL 9 (0.4%) 2 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%)
    4.0–4.9 LGE/mL 19 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.9%)
    5.0–5.9 LGE/mL 18 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    6.0–6.9 LGE/mL 25 (1.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (3.8%)
    7.0–7.9 LGE/mL 15 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.9%)
    8.0–8.7 LGE/mL 3 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.9%)
    >8.7 LGE/mL 1 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PCR (n = 1092) (n = 36) (n = 21)
    Below detectable levels 222 (20.3%) 7 (19.4%) 4 (19.0%)
    <2.1 Logcopies/mL 15 (1.4%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (9.5%)
    2.1–2.9 Logcopies/mL 226 (20.7%) 10 (27.8%) 8 (38.1%)
    3.0–3.9 Logcopies/mL 162 (14.8%) 12 (33.3%) 1 (4.8%)
    4.0–4.9 Logcopies/mL 98 (9.0%) 3 (8.3%) 1 (4.8%)
    5.0–5.9 Logcopies/mL 106 (9.7%) 1 (2.8%) 2 (9.5%)
    6.0–6.9 Logcopies/mL 145 (13.3%) 3 (8.3%) 2 (9.5%)
    7.0–7.9 Logcopies/mL 92 (8.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    8.0–8.8 Logcopies/mL 15 (1.4%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (4.8%)
    >8.8 Logcopies/mL 11 (1.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Antiviral therapy for hepatitis B before cancer diagnosis (n = 1000) (n = 24) (n = 19)
    Nucleos(t)ide analog 883 21 16
    Interferon 87 1 2
    Other 30 2 1
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Response to antiviral therapy for hepatitis B before cancer diagnosis (n = 836) (n = 17) (n = 18)
    Null response 108 (12.9%) 3 (17.6%) 1 (5.6%)
    Biochemical response 238 (28.5%) 4 (23.5%) 8 (44.4%)
    Relapse 17 (2.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Complete response (undetectable HBV DNA) 473 (56.6%) 10 (58.8%) 9 (50.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: HBcAb, antibody to hepatitis B core antigen; HBeAb, antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAb, antibody to hepatitisB surface antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus.
    TABLE 7. Antiviral therapy for the hepatitis B and hepatitis C.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    HCV Ab (n = 17 576) (n = 1333) (n = 253)
    Negative 9541 (54.3%) 1159 (86.9%) 172 (68.0%)
    Positive 8008 (45.6%) 174 (13.1%) 81 (32.0%)
    Equivocal (±) 27 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    HCV RNA (logIU/mL) (n = 5461) (n = 170) (n = 71)
    Below detectable level 2042 (37.4%) 126 (74.1%) 38 (53.5%)
    Positive <1.2 8 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    1.2∼2.9 61 (1.1%) 2 (1.2%) 1 (1.4%)
    3.0∼4.9 516 (9.4%) 6 (3.5%) 6 (8.5%)
    5.0∼6.9 2632 (48.2%) 33 (19.4%) 24 (33.8%)
    7.0∼ 202 (3.7%) 3 (1.8%) 2 (2.8%)
    Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C before cancer diagnosis (n = 2394) (n = 50) (n = 37)
    Interferon alone 1010 21 12
    Peginterferon alone 189 3 3
    Interferon + ribavirin 238 2 6
    Peginterferon + ribavirin 641 20 12
    Peginterferon + ribavirin + DAA 118 0 2
    DAA alone 198 4 2
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Response to antiviral therapy for hepatitis C before cancer diagnosis (n = 2091) (n = 48) (n = 30)
    Null response 750 (35.9%) 11 (22.9%) 11 (36.7%)
    Biochemical response 149 (7.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.3%)
    Relapse 244 (11.7%) 2 (4.2%) 5 (16.7%)
    Complete response (SVR) 948 (45.3%) 35 (72.9%) 13 (43.3%)
    HIV Ab (n = 5910) (n = 596) (n = 108)
    Negative 5875 (99.4%) 593 (99.5%) 107 (99.1%)
    Positive 33 (0.6%) 3 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%)
    Equivocal (±) 2 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.9%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: HCV, hepatitis C virus; SVR, sustained virologic response.
    TABLE 8. Imaging diagnosis (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Maximum tumor diameter (intrahepatic) (n = 18 177) (n = 1270) (n = 257)
    ≤1 cm 979 (5.4%) 20 (1.6%) 6 (2.3%)
    1 cm to ≤2 cm 4939 (27.2%) 156 (12.3%) 42 (16.4%)
    2 cm to ≤3 cm 4082 (22.5%) 238 (18.7%) 46 (18.0%)
    3 cm to ≤5 cm 3685 (20.3%) 352 (27.7%) 63 (24.5%)
    5 cm to ≤10 cm 3189 (17.6%) 401 (31.6%) 79 (30.7%)
    10 cm to ≤15 cm 1047 (5.8%) 88 (6.9%) 18 (7.0%)
    15 cm to ≤20 cm 229 (1.3%) 13 (1.0%) 3 (1.2%)
    20 cm to 25 cm 18 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    >25 cm 9 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    No. tumors (intrahepatic) (n = 18 163) (n = 1283) (n = 256)
    1 11 996 (66.0%) 1014 (79.0%) 164 (64.1%)
    2 2750 (15.1%) 71 (5.5%) 37 (14.5%)
    3 1202 (6.6%) 30 (2.3%) 12 (4.7%)
    4 436 (2.4%) 12 (0.9%) 7 (2.7%)
    5 268 (1.5%) 16 (1.2%) 4 (1.6%)
    6 120 (0.7%) 5 (0.4%) 4 (1.6%)
    7 65 (0.4%) 3 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
    8 40 (0.2%) 2 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
    9 10 (0.1%) 2 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥10 1276 (7.0%) 128 (10.0%) 28 (10.9%)
    Multifocal disease (n = 18 494) (n = 1365) (n = 262)
    Single lobe 14 952 (80.8%) 1162 (85.1%) 209 (79.8%)
    Both lobes 3542 (19.2%) 203 (14.9%) 53 (20.2%)
    Hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 17 574)
    Morphological classification on imaging
    Nodular 15 622 (88.9%)
    Massive 1322 (7.5%)
    Diffuse 558 (3.2%)
    Other 72 (0.4%)
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1163)
    Morphological classification on imaging
    Mass-forming type 849 (73.0%)
    Periductal infiltrating type 120 (10.3%)
    Intraductal growth type 30 (2.6%)
    Mass-forming type + periductal infiltrating type 152 (13.1%)
    Other 12 (1.0%)
    Arterial phase enhancement (n = 17 636) (n = 1200) (n = 252)
    No 1234 (7.0%) 693 (57.8%) 38 (15.1%)
    Yes 16 402 (93.0%) 507 (42.3%) 214 (84.9%)
    Venous phase washout (n = 17 153) (n = 1126) (n = 245)
    None 1645 (9.6%) 850 (75.5%) 64 (26.1%)
    Yes 15 508 (90.4%) 276 (24.5%) 181 (73.9%)
    Internal component of tumor (n = 17 318) (n = 1188) (n = 247)
    Solid 17 063 (98.5%) 1129 (95.0%) 242 (98.0%)
    Cystic 255 (1.5%) 59 (5.0%) 5 (2.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    TABLE 9. Imaging diagnosis (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Portal vein invasion by imaging (n = 17 754) (n = 1237) (n = 252)
    Image-Vp0 15 431 (86.9%) 793 (64.1%) 192 (76.2%)
    Image-Vp1 704 (4.0%) 140 (11.3%) 21 (8.3%)
    Image-Vp2 488 (2.7%) 122 (9.9%) 11 (4.4%)
    Image-Vp3 593 (3.3%) 136 (11.0%) 11 (4.4%)
    Image-Vp4 538 (3.0%) 46 (3.7%) 17 (6.7%)
    Hepatic vein invasion by imaging (n = 17 608) (n = 1213) (n = 251)
    Image-Vv0 16 390 (93.1%) 945 (77.9%) 213 (84.9%)
    Image-Vv1 546 (3.1%) 117 (9.6%) 20 (8.0%)
    Image-Vv2 390 (2.2%) 129 (10.6%) 8 (3.2%)
    Image-Vv3 282 (1.6%) 22 (1.8%) 10 (4.0%)
    Bile duct invasion by imaging (n = 17 503) (n = 1204) (n = 247)
    Image-B0 16 787 (95.9%) 665 (55.2%) 211 (85.4%)
    Image-B1 283 (1.6%) 153 (12.7%) 15 (6.1%)
    Image-B2 216 (1.2%) 145 (12.0%) 11 (4.5%)
    Image-B3 147 (0.8%) 171 (14.2%) 7 (2.8%)
    Image-B4 70 (0.4%) 70 (5.8%) 3 (1.2%)
    Tumor rupture (n = 18 304) (n = 1384) (n = 261)
    No rupture 17 686 (96.6%) 1380 (99.7%) 256 (98.1%)
    Suspected rupture 134 (0.7%) 2 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    Rupture 484 (2.6%) 2 (0.1%) 5 (1.9%)
    Extrahepatic spread (EHS) (n = 988) (n = 479) (n = 59)
    Lung 313 93 13
    Bone 209 47 6
    Adrenal gland 62 10 4
    Lymph node 295 244 31
    Brain 6 6 0
    Peritoneum 63 61 2
    Other 40 18 3
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Esophageal/gastric varices (n = 3393) (n = 41) (n = 35)
    ≤F1 or RC(−) 2220 (65.4%) 31 (75.6%) 27 (77.1%)
    ≥F2 and RC(+) 955 (28.1%) 8 (19.5%) 6 (17.1%)
    Rupture 218 (6.4%) 2 (4.9%) 2 (5.7%)
    TNM stage by LCSGJ (n = 16 864) (n = 918) (n = 129)
    Stage I 4018 (23.8%) 79 (8.6%) 24 (18.6%)
    Stage II 7154 (42.4%) 348 (37.9%) 55 (42.6%)
    Stage III 3850 (22.8%) 231 (25.2%) 34 (26.4%)
    Stage IVA 1419 (8.4%) 52 (5.7%) 12 (9.3%)
    Stage IVB 423 (2.5%) 208 (22.7%) 4 (3.1%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: B0, absence of invasion of the bile ducts; B1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the third order or more peripheral branches of the bile duct, but not of second order branches; B2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the second order branches of the bile duct; B3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the first order branches of the bile duct; B4, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the common hepatic duct; F1, small varices; F2, moderate varices; RC, red color sign; Vp0, absence of invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the portal vein; Vp1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) distal to the second order branches of the portal vein, but not of the second order branches; Vp2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) second order branches of the portal vein; Vp3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) first order branches of the portal vein; Vp4, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the main trunk of the portal vein and/or contra-lateral portal vein branch to the primarily involved lobe; Vv0, absence of invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the hepatic vein; Vv1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) peripheral branches of the hepatic vein; Vv2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the right, middle, or left hepatic vein, the inferior right hepatic vein, or the short hepatic vein; Vv3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the inferior vena cava.

    Initial treatment selection

    The initial treatment modality for HCC was surgical intervention (resection or transplantation) in 41.8%, local ablation therapy in 19.4%, TACE in 25.4%, HAIC in 3.1%, and systemic chemotherapy in 1.2% of patients. For ICC, these figures were 56.3% for surgery (resection only) and 18.7% for systemic chemotherapy; for combined HCC and ICC, these figures were 71.1% for surgery (resection only), 8.0% for TACE, 2.7% for HAIC, and 7.6% for systemic chemotherapy (Table 10).

    TABLE 10. Initial treatment method.
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Initial treatment method (summary) (n = 18 786) (n = 1448) (n = 263)
    Hepatectomy or liver transplantation 7860 (41.8%) 815 (56.3%) 187 (71.1%)
    Local ablation therapy (percutaneous ethanol injection, microwave coagulation, or radiofrequency ablation) 3643 (19.4%) 7 (0.5%) 5 (1.9%)
    Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization 4775 (25.4%) 21 (1.5%) 21 (8.0%)
    Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy 589 (3.1%) 7 (0.5%) 7 (2.7%)
    Systemic chemotherapy (oral or intravenous) 217 (1.2%) 271 (18.7%) 20 (7.6%)
    Other therapy 184 (1.0%) 22 (1.5%) 2 (0.8%)
    No therapy 1518 (8.1%) 305 (21.1%) 21 (8.0%)

    The distribution of Child–Pugh grades (A/B/C) by treatment in patients with HCC was 91.4%/8.2%/0.5% for those who underwent surgery, 77.8%/20.9%/1.2% for those who underwent local ablation therapy, 67.2%/29.5%/3.3% for those who underwent TACE, 54.7%/38.9%/6.4% for those who underwent HAIC, and 71.3%/27.0%/1.6% for those who underwent systemic chemotherapy. The proportion with a Child–Pugh grade A was highest for surgery, and lower for local ablation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, TACE, and HAIC in that order (Table 11).

    TABLE 11. Most commonly used hepatocellular carcinoma therapies by Child–Pugh and modified albumin-bilirubin grades (calculated from reported parameters).
    Surgery Local ablation therapy TACE HAIC Systemic chemotherapy Other therapy No therapy
    Child–Pugh grade n = 8610 n = 3543 n = 4578 n = 579 n = 492 n = 193 n = 1560
    A 7867 (91.4%) 2758 (77.8%) 3077 (67.2%) 317 (54.7%) 351 (71.3%) 137 (71.0%) 521 (33.4%)
    B 703 (8.2%) 742 (20.9%) 1352 (29.5%) 225 (38.9%) 133 (27.0%) 41 (21.2%) 663 (42.5%)
    C 40 (0.5%) 43 (1.2%) 149 (3.3%) 37 (6.4%) 8 (1.6%) 15 (7.8%) 376 (24.1%)
    mALBI grade n = 8943 n = 3675 n = 4790 n = 599 n = 535 n = 207 n = 1844
    1 3763 (42.1%) 886 (24.1%) 792 (16.5%) 62 (10.4%) 114 (21.3%) 46 (22.2%) 157 (8.5%)
    2a 2542 (28.4%) 905 (24.6%) 1020 (21.3%) 106 (17.7%) 129 (24.1%) 41 (19.8%) 200 (10.8%)
    2b 2386 (26.7%) 1545 (42.0%) 2222 (46.4%) 283 (47.2%) 232 (43.4%) 77 (37.2%) 647 (35.1%)
    3 252 (2.8%) 339 (9.2%) 756 (15.8%) 148 (24.7%) 60 (11.2%) 43 (20.8%) 840 (45.6%)
    • Abbreviations: HAIC, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy; mALBI, modified albumin-bilirubin; TACE, transcatheterarterial chemoembolization.

    Surgery

    A total of 7981 patients with HCC underwent hepatectomy (including 541 laparoscopic-assisted and 1203 laparoscopic surgeries), and 41 underwent liver transplantation (Table 12). The macroscopic classification of resected specimens for HCC was simple nodular type for 60.6%, simple nodular type with extranodular growth for 17.5%, and confluent multinodular type for 18.9% of patients. Small nodular type with indistinct margin, a pathological early HCC, was observed in 2.1% of patients. For ICC, the most common classification was mass-forming type at 72.3%, followed by periductal infiltrating type at 8.7% and intraductal growth type at 4.4% (Table 12). Table 13 summarizes macroscopic findings in resected specimens and operative findings.

    TABLE 12. Hepatectomy or liver transplantation (1).
    Resected hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Surgery (n = 7981) (n = 823) (n = 189)
    Hepatectomy (open) 6196 (77.6%) 743 (90.3%) 148 (78.3%)
    Hepatectomy (laparoscopic-assisted) 541 (6.8%) 32 (3.9%) 12 (6.3%)
    Hepatectomy (laparoscopic) 1203 (15.1%) 48 (5.8%) 28 (14.8%)
    Liver transplantation 41 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.5%)
    Macroscopic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5861)
    Small nodular type with indistinct margin 124 (2.1%)
    Simple nodular type 3554 (60.6%)
    Simple nodular type with extranodular growth 1028 (17.5%)
    Confluent multinodular type 1105 (18.9%)
    Infiltrative type 50 (0.9%)
    Macroscopic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma (Eggel's classification) (n = 1682)
    Nodular 1513 (90.0%)
    Massive 129 (7.7%)
    Diffuse 29 (1.7%)
    Other 11 (0.7%)
    Macroscopic classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 721)
    Mass-forming type 521 (72.3%)
    Periductal infiltrating type 62 (8.6%)
    Intraductal growth type 32 (4.4%)
    Mix of mass-forming type and periductal infiltrating type 78 (10.8%)
    Mix of periductal infiltrating type and intraductal growth type 6 (0.8%)
    Mix of mass-forming type and intraductal growth type 10 (1.4%)
    Other 12 (1.7%)
    Maximum diameter of resected primary tumor (n = 7749) (n = 770) (n = 183)
    ≤1 cm 263 (3.4%) 9 (1.2%) 3 (1.6%)
    >1 cm to ≤2 cm 1615 (20.8%) 108 (14.0%) 28 (15.3%)
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 1864 (24.1%) 172 (22.3%) 40 (21.9%)
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 1929 (24.9%) 238 (30.9%) 56 (30.6%)
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 1511 (19.5%) 210 (27.3%) 47 (25.7%)
    >10 cm to ≤15 cm 434 (5.6%) 27 (3.5%) 8 (4.4%)
    >15 cm to ≤20 cm 112 (1.4%) 5 (0.6%) 1 (0.5%)
    >20 cm to ≤25 cm 16 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    >25 cm 5 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    No. tumors resected (n = 7791) (n = 788) (n = 185)
    1 6214 (79.8%) 697 (88.5%) 134 (72.4%)
    2 1032 (13.2%) 48 (6.1%) 32 (17.3%)
    3 289 (3.7%) 13 (1.6%) 10 (5.4%)
    4 88 (1.1%) 5 (0.6%) 3 (1.6%)
    5 44 (0.6%) 4 (0.5%) 1 (0.5%)
    6 13 (0.2%) 2 (0.3%) 3 (1.6%)
    7 10 (0.1%) 2 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%)
    8 4 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    9 2 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥10 95 (1.2%) 17 (2.2%) 2 (1.1%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    TABLE 13. Hepatectomy and liver transplantation (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Tumor distribution (1) (n = 7648) (n = 775) (n = 180)
    Hs 3169 (41.4%) 148 (19.1%) 59 (32.8%)
    H1 2392 (31.3%) 280 (36.1%) 52 (28.9%)
    H2 1784 (23.3%) 300 (38.7%) 60 (33.3%)
    H3 223 (2.9%) 42 (5.4%) 6 (3.3%)
    H4 80 (1.0%) 5 (0.6%) 3 (1.7%)
    Tumor distribution (2) (n = 7684) (n = 783) (n = 185)
    Localized to one lobe 6842 (89.0%) 702 (89.7%) 153 (82.7%)
    Both lobes 842 (11.0%) 81 (10.3%) 32 (17.3%)
    Growth pattern (n = 7611) (n = 760) (n = 183)
    Eg 7090 (93.2%) 383 (50.4%) 138 (75.4%)
    Ig 521 (6.8%) 377 (49.6%) 45 (24.6%)
    Extent of hepatectomy (n = 7563) (n = 783) (n = 187)
    Hr0 2401 (31.7%) 75 (9.6%) 55 (29.4%)
    HrS 1671 (22.1%) 73 (9.3%) 35 (18.7%)
    Hr1 1883 (24.9%) 141 (18.0%) 43 (23.0%)
    Hr2 1490 (19.7%) 431 (55.0%) 47 (25.1%)
    Hr3 118 (1.6%) 62 (7.9%) 7 (3.7%)
    Total hepatectomy 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    Bile duct resection (n = 7516) (n = 775) (n = 185)
    No 7354 (97.8%) 566 (73.0%) 174 (94.1%)
    Yes 162 (2.2%) 209 (27.0%) 11 (5.9%)
    Lymph node dissection (n = 7494) (n = 790) (n = 186)
    D (−) 7388 (98.6%) 422 (53.4%) 167 (89.8%)
    D (+) 106 (1.4%) 368 (46.6%) 19 (10.2%)
    Lymph nodes dissected (n = 7442) (n = 779) (n = 184)
    No 7341 (98.6%) 397 (51.0%) 162 (88.0%)
    Perihepatic only (up to #8a, 12abchp, 13a) 81 (1.1%) 319 (40.9%) 15 (8.2%)
    Outside of portal area 20 (0.3%) 63 (8.1%) 7 (3.8%)
    Residual cancer (n = 7716) (n = 791) (n = 185)
    No 7471 (96.8%) 740 (93.6%) 176 (95.1%)
    Yes 245 (3.2%) 51 (6.4%) 9 (4.9%)
    Extrahepatic metastasis (n = 7757) (n = 799) (n = 188)
    M0 7688 (99.1%) 775 (97.0%) 186 (98.9%)
    M1 69 (0.9%) 24 (3.0%) 2 (1.1%)
    TNM stage by LCSGJ (n = 7028) (n = 496) (n = 116)
    Stage I 1323 (18.8%) 50 (10.1%) 15 (12.9%)
    Stage II 3557 (50.6%) 137 (27.6%) 44 (37.9%)
    Stage III 1625 (23.1%) 181 (36.5%) 44 (37.9%)
    Stage IVA 464 (6.6%) 43 (8.7%) 10 (8.6%)
    Stage IVB 59 (0.8%) 85 (17.1%) 3 (2.6%)
    Curability: Hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 7433)
    A1 2468 (33.2%)
    A2 2876 (38.7%)
    B 1723 (23.2%)
    C 366 (4.9%)
    Curability: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 683)
    A 291 (42.6%)
    B 328 (48.0%)
    C 64 (9.4%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: D (−), dissection not performed; D (+), dissection performed; Eg, expansive growth, well demarcated border; Ig, infiltrative growth poorly demarcated border; F0, no fibrosis; F1, fibrous expansion of portal tract; F2, fibrous septa formation, usually incomplete; F3, bridging fibrosis formation accompanying lobular distinction; F4, cirrhosis; Hr0, resection of less than one subsegment (Couinaud's segment); Hs, cancer limited to one subsegment, H1, cancer limited to one segment; H2, cancer limited to two segments; H3, cancer limited to three segments; H4, cancer involving more than three segments; HrS, resection of one subsegment (Couinaud's segment); Hr1, resection of one segment (anterior, posterior, medial, or left lateral segmentectomy); Hr2, resection of two segments (right or left bisegmentectomy or central bisegmentectomy); Hr3, resection of three segments (right or left trisegmentectomy); lc, liver cirrhosis; nl, normal liver; TNM, tumor–node–metastasis.
    • Curability: Hepatocellular carcinoma; A1, stage I and no cancer invasion at the surgical margin (SM); A2, stage II and SM (−); B, no residual cancer, but not met of criteria for A1 and A2; C, definite residual cancer.
    • Curability: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; A, complete resection of stage I or II cancer without residual cancer; B, complete resection of stage III or stage IV cancer without residual cancer; C, incomplete resection with residual cancer.

    Tumor diameter among patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC was ≤2 cm in 24.2%, 2–5 cm in 49.0%, and 5–10 cm in 19.5%. The percentage with unifocal disease was 79.8% (Table 12). The type of surgery was Hr0 (limited resection) in 31.7%, HrS (1 subsegmentectomy) in 22.1%, Hr1 (1 segmentectomy) in 24.9%, Hr2 (2 segmentectomy) in 19.7%, and Hr3 (3 segmentectomy) in 1.6% of patients (Table 13). The stage of HCC was I in 18.8%, II in 50.6%, III in 23.1%, IVA in 6.6%, and IVB in 0.8% of patients (Table 13).

    Among patients with ICC, tumor diameter was ≤2 cm in 15.2%, 2–5 cm in 53.1%, and 5–10 cm in 27.3% of patients, and 88.5% had unifocal disease (Table 12).

    Local ablation therapy

    Local ablation therapy was carried out in 4438 patients with HCC. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy was performed in 3.8%, percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy in 3.8%, and radiofrequency ablation in 92.5% of patients. The treatment route was percutaneous in 89.6% of patients. The procedure was performed laparoscopically or thoracoscopically in 4.0%, and by laparotomy or thoracotomy in 5.7% of patients. The percentage with unifocal disease was 79.7%. Tumor diameter was ≤2 cm in 66.8%, 2–3 cm in 25.8%, and >3 cm in 7.4% of patients. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of treatment was complete response (CR) in 83.5%, partial response (PR) in 68.7%, stable disease (SD) in 3.5%, and progressive disease (PD) in 6.1% of patients (Table 14).

    TABLE 14. Radiofrequency ablation (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Treatment (n = 4438) (n = 15) (n = 11)
    Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy 106 (2.4%) 2 (13.3%) 0 (0.0%)
    Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy 167 (3.8%) 2 (13.3%) 2 (18.2%)
    Radiofrequency ablation 4105 (92.5%) 9 (60.0%) 7 (63.6%)
    Other 60 (1.4%) 2 (13.3%) 2 (18.2%)
    Purpose of treatment (n = 4436) (n = 15) (n = 11)
    Curative 4286 (96.6%) 12 (80.0%) 7 (63.6%)
    Palliative 150 (3.4%) 3 (20.0%) 4 (36.4%)
    Treatment route (n = 4422) (n = 15) (n = 11)
    Percutaneous 3960 (89.6%) 11 (73.3%) 7 (63.6%)
    Laparoscopic or thoracoscopic 176 (4.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (9.1%)
    Laparotomy or thoracotomy 253 (5.7%) 3 (20.0%) 1 (9.1%)
    Combination of percutaneous and laparotomy 12 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Other 21 (0.5%) 1 (6.7%) 2 (18.2%)
    Combination with other treatment (n = 1379) (n = 3) (n = 5)
    Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization 1278 (92.7%) 2 (66.7%) 2 (40.0%)
    Other 101 (7.3%) 1 (33.3%) 3 (60.0%)
    Complications (multiple choices allowed) (n = 80) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    Hemorrhage (hemobilia or hematoma) 29 0 0
    Gastrointestinal perforation or penetration 0 0 0
    Bile duct injury 3 0 0
    Abscess 4 0 0
    Extrahepatic dissemination 1 0 0
    Hepatic infarction 8 0 0
    Liver failure 3 0 0
    Other 32 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    No. tumors treated (n = 4329) (n = 14) (n = 11)
    1 3451 (79.7%) 12 (85.7%) 7 (63.6%)
    2 658 (15.2%) 1 (7.1%) 2 (18.2%)
    3 155 (3.6%) 1 (7.1%) 1 (9.1%)
    4 39 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (9.1%)
    5 17 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    6 5 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    7 2 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    8 1 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    9 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥10 1 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Maximum diameter of treated tumors (n = 4224) (n = 12) (n = 10)
    ≤1 cm 570 (13.5%) 2 (16.7%) 2 (20.0%)
    >1 cm to ≤2 cm 2251 (53.3%) 5 (41.7%) 5 (50.0%)
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 1091 (25.8%) 4 (33.3%) 1 (10.0%)
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 272 (6.4%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (20.0%)
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 28 (0.7%) 1 (8.3%) 0 (0.0%)
    >10 cm to ≤15 cm 7 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    >15 cm to ≤20 cm 5 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    >20 cm to ≤25 cm 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    >25 cm 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Direct response assessment (n = 3969) (n = 11) (n = 9)
    TE4a 3067 (77.3%) 6 (54.5%) 6 (66.7%)
    TE4b 614 (15.5%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (11.1%)
    TE3 173 (4.4%) 3 (27.3%) 2 (22.2%)
    TE2 85 (2.1%) 1 (9.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE1 30 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    AFP value before therapy (ng/mL) (n = 4342) (n = 12) (n = 11)
    <10 2146 (49.4%) 9 (75.0%) 5 (45.5%)
    ≤199 1813 (41.8%) 2 (16.7%) 3 (27.3%)
    ≤399 147 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤999 104 (2.4%) 1 (8.3%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤9999 110 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (9.1%)
    ≤99 999 21 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (18.2%)
    ≥100 000 1 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Overall response at 1–3 months (n = 3492) (n = 12) (n = 8)
    CR 2917 (83.5%) 5 (41.7%) 5 (62.5%)
    PR 239 (6.8%) 5 (41.7%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 122 (3.5%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (12.5%)
    PD 214 (6.1%) 1 (8.3%) 2 (25.0%)
    Overall response at 6 months (n = 3384) (n = 10) (n = 8)
    CR 2715 (80.2%) 4 (40.0%) 3 (37.5%)
    PR 192 (5.7%) 2 (20.0%) 1 (12.5%)
    SD 102 (3.0%) 3 (30.0%) 1 (12.5%)
    PD 375 (11.1%) 1 (10.0%) 3 (37.5%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TE1, treatment effect in target lesion (progressive disease); TE2, treatment effect in target lesion (stable disease), TE3, treatment effect in target lesion (partial response); TE4a; treatment effect in target lesion (complete response with ablative margin); TE4b, treatment effect in target lesion (complete response without ablative margin).

    TACE

    TACE was carried out in 6117 patients with HCC. Lipiodol alone was used in 12.8%, gelatin sponge alone in 6.9%, lipiodol plus gelatin sponge particles in 69.6%, and drug-eluting bead in 10.7% of patients. The area of embolization was less than one segment in 37.4%, at least one segment but less than one lobe in 39.2%, one lobe or more in 17.7%, and the entire liver in 5.7% of patients. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of treatment was CR in 36.0%, PR in 21.1%, SD in 17.8%, and PD in 25.0% of patients. TACE was carried out in 28 patients with ICC (Tables 15 and 16).

    TABLE 15. Transcatheterarterial chemoembolization /transarterial embolization (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Transarterial therapy (n = 17 049) (n = 1131) (n = 237)
    Not performed 10 294 (60.4%) 1096 (96.9%) 198 (83.5%)
    Performed 6755 (39.6%) 35 (3.1%) 39 (16.5%)
    Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (if transarterial therapy was performed) (n = 6745) (n = 35) (n = 39)
    Not performed 628 (9.3%) 7 (20.0%) 11 (28.2%)
    Performed (TACE) 6117 (90.7%) 28 (80.0%) 28 (71.8%)
    Embolic agent (n = 5919) (n = 25) (n = 26)
    Lipiodol alone 758 (12.8%) 2 (8.0%) 2 (7.7%)
    Gelatin sponge alone 407 (6.9%) 2 (8.0%) 3 (11.5%)
    Lipiodol + gelatin sponge particles 4118 (69.6%) 17 (68.0%) 17 (65.4%)
    Beads 636 (10.7%) 4 (16.0%) 4 (15.4%)
    Combination with chemotherapy agents (multiple choices allowed) (n = 7418) (n = 42) (n = 39)
    Doxorubicin 170 0 0
    Epirubicin 3293 14 15
    Mitomycin 820 3 3
    Cisplatin 1366 15 12
    SMANCS 1 0 0
    Miriplatin 1369 3 6
    5FU 309 4 2
    Interferon 14 1 0
    Other 76 2 1
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Area of embolization (enter treated area if embolization was not performed) (n = 6353) (n = 30) (n = 37)
    <1 segment 2375 (37.4%) 7 (23.3%) 11 (29.7%)
    ≥1 segment to <1 lobe 2492 (39.2%) 15 (50.0%) 11 (29.7%)
    ≥1 lobe to <entire liver 1123 (17.7%) 5 (16.7%) 5 (13.5%)
    Entire liver 363 (5.7%) 3 (10.0%) 10 (27.0%)
    Transarterial therapy Complications (n = 166) (n = 1) (n = 0)
    Acute cholecystitis 8 0 0
    Biloma 9 0 0
    Hepatic abscess 23 1 0
    Hepatic infarction 5 0 0
    Liver failure 16 0 0
    Tumor rupture 7 0 0
    Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 6 0 0
    Pulmonary infarction 1 0 0
    Spinal cord injury 0 0 0
    Other 91 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Direct response assessment (n = 5530) (n = 27) (n = 31)
    TE4a 822 (14.9%) 2 (7.4%) 2 (6.5%)
    TE4b 1352 (24.4%) 4 (14.8%) 4 (12.9%)
    TE3 1547 (28.0%) 8 (29.6%) 7 (22.6%)
    TE2 1370 (24.8%) 9 (33.3%) 13 (41.9%)
    TE1 439 (7.9%) 4 (14.8%) 5 (16.1%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; SMANCS, styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin; TACE, transcatheterarterial chemoembolization; TE1, treatment effect in target lesion (progressive disease); TE2, treatment effect in target lesion (stable disease), TE3, treatment effect in target lesion (partial response); TE4a; treatment effect in target lesion (complete response with ablative margin); TE4b, treatment effect in target lesion (complete response without ablative margin).
    TABLE 16. Transcatheterarterial chemoembolization /transarterial embolization (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    AFP value before therapy(ng/mL) (n = 6554) (n = 30) (n = 38)
    <10 2490 (38.0%) 21 (70.0%) 9 (23.7%)
    ≤199 2463 (37.6%) 6 (20.0%) 15 (39.5%)
    ≤399 308 (4.7%) 1 (3.3%) 1 (2.6%)
    ≤999 349 (5.3%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (7.9%)
    ≤9999 540 (8.2%) 2 (6.7%) 7 (18.4%)
    ≤99 999 289 (4.4%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (7.9%)
    ≥100 000 115 (1.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    First AFP value after therapy (ng/mL) (n = 5423) (n = 20) (n = 32)
    <10 2630 (48.5%) 13 (65.0%) 13 (40.6%)
    ≤199 1845 (34.0%) 3 (15.0%) 8 (25.0%)
    ≤399 203 (3.7%) 3 (15.0%) 3 (9.4%)
    ≤999 193 (3.6%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (3.1%)
    ≤9999 306 (5.6%) 1 (5.0%) 5 (15.6%)
    ≤99 999 173 (3.2%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (6.3%)
    ≥100 000 73 (1.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    AFP-L3 fraction before therapy (%) (n = 3451) (n = 15) (n = 24)
    <5.0 1514 (43.9%) 6 (40.0%) 8 (33.3%)
    <10.0 567 (16.4%) 1 (6.7%) 3 (12.5%)
    ≤14.9 230 (6.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤19.9 140 (4.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (4.2%)
    ≥20.0 1000 (29.0%) 8 (53.3%) 12 (50.0%)
    Overall response at 1–3 months (n = 4727) (n = 21) (n = 26)
    CR 1704 (36.0%) 5 (23.8%) 7 (26.9%)
    PR 997 (21.1%) 6 (28.6%) 2 (7.7%)
    SD 843 (17.8%) 1 (4.8%) 5 (19.2%)
    PD 1183 (25.0%) 9 (42.9%) 12 (46.2%)
    Overall response at 6 months (n = 4167) (n = 20) (n = 21)
    CR 1531 (36.7%) 5 (25.0%) 4 (19.0%)
    PR 658 (15.8%) 5 (25.0%) 4 (19.0%)
    SD 526 (12.6%) 1 (5.0%) 2 (9.5%)
    PD 1452 (34.8%) 9 (45.0%) 11 (52.4%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein; CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

    HAIC

    1. One-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

      One-shot HAIC was carried out in 207 patients. The area of treatment was less than one segment in 15.3%, at least one segment but less than one lobe in 26.0%, one lobe or more in 30.5%, and the entire liver in 28.2% of patients. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of treatment was CR in 9.2%, PR in 9.2%, SD in 29.2%, and PD in 52.3% of patients (Tables 17 and 18).

    2. Continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir (implanted port system)

    TABLE 17. One-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    One-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (n = 207) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    Performed 207 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    Combination with chemotherapy agents (multiple choices allowed) (n = 265) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    Doxorubicin 4 0 0
    Epirubicin 37 0 0
    Mitomycin 34 0 0
    Cisplatin 141 0 1
    SMANCS 0 0 0
    Miriplatin 21 0 0
    5FU 19 0 0
    Interferon 0 0 0
    Other 9 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Area of treatment (n = 177) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    <1 segment 27 (15.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥1 segment to <1 lobe 46 (26.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥1 lobe to <entire liver 54 (30.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Entire liver 50 (28.2%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    One-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy Complications (n = 7) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    Acute cholecystitis 0 0 0
    Biloma 0 0 0
    Hepatic abscess 0 0 0
    Hepatic infarction 0 0 0
    Liver failure 1 0 0
    Tumor rupture 1 0 0
    Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 0 0 0
    Pulmonary infarction 0 0 0
    Spinal cord injury 0 0 0
    Other 5 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Direct response assessment (n = 147) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    TE4a 5 (3.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE4b 8 (5.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE3 10 (6.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE2 77 (52.4%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    TE1 47 (32.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; SMANCS, styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin; TACE, transcatheterarterial chemoembolization; TE1, treatment effect in target lesion (progressive disease); TE2, treatment effect in target lesion (stable disease), TE3, treatment effect in target lesion (partial response); TE4a; treatment effect in target lesion (complete response with ablative margin); TE4b, treatment effect in target lesion (complete response without ablative margin).
    TABLE 18. One-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    AFP value before therapy (ng/mL) (n = 197) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    <10 38 (19.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤199 60 (30.5%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    ≤399 5 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤999 15 (7.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤9999 29 (14.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤99 999 34 (17.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥100 000 16 (8.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    First AFP value after therapy (ng/mL) (n = 162) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    <10 34 (21.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤199 41 (25.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    ≤399 14 (8.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤999 13 (8.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤9999 20 (12.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤99 999 22 (13.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥100 000 18 (11.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    AFP-L3 fraction before therapy (%) (n = 112) (n = 0) (n = 1)
    <5.0 26 (23.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    <10.0 8 (7.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤14.9 7 (6.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤19.9 4 (3.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥20.0 67 (59.8%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)
    Overall response at 1–3 months (n = 130) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    CR 12 (9.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PR 12 (9.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 38 (29.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PD 68 (52.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Overall response at 6 months (n = 99) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    CR 11 (11.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PR 7 (7.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 16 (16.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PD 65 (65.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein; CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

    Continuous HAIC was performed via a catheter in 221 patients. The area of treatment was less than one segment in 11.9%, at least one segment but less than one lobe in 17.9%, one lobe or more in 20.9%, and the entire liver in 49.3% of patients. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of treatment was CR in 3.7%, PR in 23.8%, SD in 28.7%, and PD in 43.9% of patients (Tables 19 and 20).

    TABLE 19. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir: Continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir (n = 221) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    Performed 221 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Combination with chemotherapy agents (multiple choices allowed) (n = 403) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    Doxorubicin 0 0 0
    Epirubicin 3 0 0
    Mitomycin 2 0 0
    Cisplatin 195 0 0
    SMANCS 0 0 0
    Miriplatin 4 0 0
    5FU 183 0 0
    Interferon 11 0 0
    Other 5 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Treated area (n = 134) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    <1 segment 16 (11.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥1 segment to <1 lobe 24 (17.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥1 lobe to <entire liver 28 (20.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Entire liver 66 (49.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir Complications (n = 21) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    Acute cholecystitis 1 0 0
    Biloma 0 0 0
    Hepatic abscess 0 0 0
    Hepatic infarction 1 0 0
    Liver failure 3 0 0
    Tumor rupture 1 0 0
    Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1 0 0
    Pulmonary infarction 0 0 0
    Spinal cord injury 0 0 0
    Other 14 0 0
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    Direct response assessment (n = 168) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    TE4a 1 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE4b 5 (3.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE3 27 (16.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE2 97 (57.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    TE1 38 (22.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; SMANCS, styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin; TACE, transcatheterarterial chemoembolization; TE1, treatment effect in target lesion (progressive disease); TE2, treatment effect in target lesion (stable disease), TE3, treatment effect in target lesion (partial response); TE4a; treatment effect in target lesion (complete response with ablative margin); TE4b, treatment effect in target lesion (complete response without ablative margin).
    TABLE 20. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir: Continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (2).
    AFP value before therapy (ng/ml) (n = 215) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    <10 28 (13.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤199 60 (27.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤399 21 (9.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤999 14 (6.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤9999 37 (17.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤99 999 36 (16.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥100 000 19 (8.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    First AFP value after therapy (ng/mL) (n = 185) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    <10 22 (11.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤199 69 (37.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤399 14 (7.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤999 9 (4.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤9999 34 (18.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤99 999 24 (13.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥100 000 13 (7.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    AFP-L3 fraction before therapy (%) (n = 134) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    <5.0 22 (16.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    <10.0 13 (9.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤14.9 7 (5.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≤19.9 10 (7.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    ≥20.0 82 (61.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Overall response at 1–3 months (n = 164) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    CR 6 (3.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PR 39 (23.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 47 (28.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PD 72 (43.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    Overall response at 6 months (n = 122) (n = 0) (n = 0)
    CR 8 (6.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PR 28 (23.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 26 (21.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    PD 60 (49.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein; CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

    Systemic chemotherapy (molecular targeted therapy)

    The proportion of patients who underwent chemotherapy was higher in the 19th and earlier surveys, because HAIC was included under the category of chemotherapy at that time. Starting in the 20th survey, HAIC was placed in its own category separate from systemic chemotherapy and also divided into subcategories by whether or not a reservoir was used. Systemic chemotherapy was carried out in 423 patients with HCC. The route of administration was intravenous in 9.7% and oral in 90.3% of patients. Sorafenib was approved in Japan in May 2009, and the number of patients treated with sorafenib (354 patients) was the highest in this 23rd survey (2014–2015) than in any previous survey. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of systemic chemotherapy was CR in 6.4%, PR in 9.9%, SD in 27.1%, and PD in 56.7% of patients. The response assessed at 6 months was CR in 7.0%, PR in 9.3%, SD in 19.0%, and PD in 64.7% of patients. Systemic chemotherapy was carried out in 363 patients with ICC. The route of administration was intravenous in 79.9% and oral in 20.1% of patients. The response assessed at 3 months after initiation of treatment was CR in 8.8%, PR in 11.3%, SD in 29.6%, and PD in 50.4% of patients. The response assessed at 6 months was CR in 10.0%, PR in 5.0%, SD in 25.0%, and PD in 60.0% of patients (Table 21).

    TABLE 21. Systemic chemotherapy (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Systemic chemotherapy route of administration (n = 423) (n = 363) (n = 32)
    Intravenous 41 (9.7%) 290 (79.9%) 9 (28.1%)
    Oral 382 (90.3%) 73 (20.1%) 23 (71.9%)
    Chemotherapy agent (n = 461) (n = 587) (n = 38)
    Doxorubicin 1 0 0
    Epirubicin 4 0 0
    Mitomycin 2 0 0
    Cisplatin 27 199 6
    5FU 26 18 2
    Interferon 1 0 0
    Sorafenib 354 6 15
    Gemcitabine 5 271 8
    Lenvatinib 0 0 0
    Regorafenib 0 0 0
    Other 41 93 7
    Percentages not calculated as multiple choices were allowed
    AFP value before therapy (ng/mL) (n = 423) (n = 260) (n = 31)
    <10 97 (22.9%) 203 (78.1%) 8 (25.8%)
    ≤199 121 (28.6%) 44 (16.9%) 9 (29.0%)
    ≤399 21 (5.0%) 5 (1.9%) 1 (3.2%)
    ≤999 40 (9.5%) 2 (0.8%) 2 (6.5%)
    ≤9999 63 (14.9%) 5 (1.9%) 9 (29.0%)
    ≤99 999 56 (13.2%) 1 (0.4%) 2 (6.5%)
    ≥100 000 25 (5.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    First AFP value after therapy (ng/mL) (n = 344) (n = 55) (n = 22)
    <10 93 (27.0%) 29 (52.7%) 6 (27.3%)
    ≤199 98 (28.5%) 19 (34.5%) 7 (31.8%)
    ≤399 17 (4.9%) 3 (5.5%) 3 (13.6%)
    ≤999 26 (7.6%) 1 (1.8%) 2 (9.1%)
    ≤9999 52 (15.1%) 3 (5.5%) 2 (9.1%)
    ≤99 999 38 (11.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (9.1%)
    ≥100 000 20 (5.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    AFP-L3 fraction before therapy (%) (n = 214) (n = 54) (n = 16)
    <5.0 54 (25.2%) 29 (53.7%) 2 (12.5%)
    <10.0 16 (7.5%) 6 (11.1%) 1 (6.3%)
    ≤14.9 17 (7.9%) 2 (3.7%) 1 (6.3%)
    ≤19.9 9 (4.2%) 3 (5.6%) 1 (6.3%)
    ≥20.0 118 (55.1%) 14 (25.9%) 11 (68.8%)
    Overall response at 1–3 months (n = 314) (n = 274) (n = 24)
    CR 20 (6.4%) 24 (8.8%) 2 (8.3%)
    PR 31 (9.9%) 31 (11.3%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 85 (27.1%) 81 (29.6%) 6 (25.0%)
    PD 178 (56.7%) 138 (50.4%) 16 (66.7%)
    Overall response at 6 months (n = 258) (n = 220) (n = 21)
    CR 18 (7.0%) 22 (10.0%) 1 (4.8%)
    PR 24 (9.3%) 11 (5.0%) 0 (0.0%)
    SD 49 (19.0%) 55 (25.0%) 2 (9.5%)
    PD 167 (64.7%) 132 (60.0%) 18 (85.7%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lectin-reactive α-fetoprotein; CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SMANCS, styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin; TACE, transcatheterarterial chemoembolization.

    Pathology

    A pathological diagnosis was obtained for 9156 patients with HCC (48.7%). Of these, 13.4% were made from a biopsy alone, 86.0% from a resected specimen alone, and 0.6% from cytology. In addition, 52.3% of patients had no pathological diagnosis. The histological grade of HCC was well differentiated in 25.3%, moderately differentiated in 63.2%, poorly differentiated in 11.0%, and undifferentiated in 0.3% of patients. The histological grade of ICC was well differentiated in 22.5%, moderately differentiated in 53.3%, and poorly differentiated in 21.0% of patients. The non-cancerous liver parenchyma in patients with HCC was normal in 13.4%, showed chronic hepatitis in 55.1%, and showed cirrhosis in 31.5%. In patients with ICC, it was normal in 51.5%, showed chronic hepatitis in 40.3%, and showed cirrhosis in 8.1% (Tables 22 and 23).

    TABLE 22. Pathology (1).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Pathological diagnosis (n = 9156) (n = 1107) (n = 228)
    Resected specimen 7876 (86.0%) 817 (73.8%) 188 (82.5%)
    Biopsy 1225 (13.4%) 248 (22.4%) 35 (15.4%)
    Cytology 55 (0.6%) 42 (3.8%) 5 (2.2%)
    Histopathological classification (n = 8522)
    Well-differentiated type 2158 (25.3%)
    Moderately differentiated type 5390 (63.2%)
    Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma 939 (11.0%)
    Undifferentiated type 24 (0.3%)
    Fibrolamellar carcinoma 5 (0.1%)
    Sarcomatous type 6 (0.1%)
    Histopathological type of HCC (n = 7442)
    Trabecular type 5773 (77.6%)
    Pseudoglandular type 761 (10.2%)
    Compact type 855 (11.5%)
    Scirrhous type 53 (0.7%)
    Histopathological classification (n = 865)
    Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma 195 (22.5%)
    Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma 461 (53.3%)
    Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma 182 (21.0%)
    Special type 27 (3.1%)
    Capsule formation (n = 7599) (n = 739) (n = 184)
    fc(−) 2157 (28.4%) 698 (94.5%) 113 (61.4%)
    fc(+) 5442 (71.6%) 41 (5.5%) 71 (38.6%)
    Capsule invasion (n = 5382) (n = 39) (n = 71)
    fc-inf(−) 1653 (30.7%) 9 (23.1%) 17 (23.9%)
    fc-inf(+) 3729 (69.3%) 30 (76.9%) 54 (76.1%)
    Septum formation (n = 7527) (n = 730) (n = 177)
    sf(−) 2576 (34.2%) 681 (93.3%) 89 (50.3%)
    sf(+) 4951 (65.8%) 49 (6.7%) 88 (49.7%)
    Serosal invasion (n = 7520) (n = 757) (n = 179)
    s0 6821 (90.7%) 550 (72.7%) 144 (80.4%)
    s1 550 (7.3%) 175 (23.1%) 32 (17.9%)
    s2 62 (0.8%) 31 (4.1%) 1 (0.6%)
    s3 (rupture) 87 (1.2%) 1 (0.1%) 2 (1.1%)
    Lymph node metastasis (n = 6883) (n = 730) (n = 165)
    n0 6834 (99.3%) 561 (76.8%) 153 (92.7%)
    n1 49 (0.7%) 169 (23.2%) 12 (7.3%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: fc (−), absence of capsule formation; fc (+), presence of capsule formation; fc-Inf (−), absence of cancerous infiltration of the tumor capsule; fc-Inf (+), presence of cancerous infiltration into the tumor capsule; s0, absence of tumor invasion of the serosa; s1, tumor invasion of the serosa; s2, tumor invasion of adjacent organs; s3, tumor rupture with intraperitoneal bleeding; sf (−), absence of formation of a fibrous septum within the tumor; sf (+), presence of fibrous septum within the tumor.
    TABLE 23. Pathology (2).
    Hepatocellular carcinoma Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma
    Vascular invasion: Portal vein (n = 7596) (n = 762) (n = 182)
    vp0 5612 (73.9%) 362 (47.5%) 97 (53.3%)
    vp1 1621 (21.3%) 282 (37.0%) 70 (38.5%)
    vp2 175 (2.3%) 57 (7.5%) 5 (2.7%)
    vp3 134 (1.8%) 49 (6.4%) 4 (2.2%)
    vp4 54 (0.7%) 12 (1.6%) 6 (3.3%)
    Vascular invasion: Hepatic vein (n = 7584) (n = 765) (n = 182)
    vv0 6600 (87.0%) 523 (68.4%) 133 (73.1%)
    vv1 841 (11.1%) 192 (25.1%) 45 (24.7%)
    vv2 106 (1.4%) 40 (5.2%) 1 (0.5%)
    vv3 37 (0.5%) 10 (1.3%) 3 (1.6%)
    Vascular invasion: Hepatic artery (n = 7553) (n = 755) (n = 179)
    va0 7447 (98.6%) 717 (95.0%) 172 (96.1%)
    va1 96 (1.3%) 27 (3.6%) 6 (3.4%)
    va2 8 (0.1%) 7 (0.9%) 1 (0.6%)
    va3 2 (0.0%) 4 (0.5%) 0 (0.0%)
    Bile duct invasion (n = 7571) (n = 739) (n = 181)
    b0 7359 (97.2%) 386 (52.2%) 160 (88.4%)
    b1 124 (1.6%) 174 (23.5%) 12 (6.6%)
    b2 40 (0.5%) 81 (11.0%) 2 (1.1%)
    b3 29 (0.4%) 72 (9.7%) 3 (1.7%)
    b4 19 (0.3%) 26 (3.5%) 4 (2.2%)
    Peritoneal metastasis (n = 7549) (n = 756) (n = 185)
    P0 7524 (99.7%) 747 (98.8%) 184 (99.5%)
    P1 20 (0.3%) 8 (1.1%) 1 (0.5%)
    P2 5 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
    Intrahepatic metastasis (n = 7269) (n = 734) (n = 177)
    Im (−) 6422 (88.3%) 631 (86.0%) 141 (79.7%)
    Im (+) 847 (11.7%) 103 (14.0%) 36 (20.3%)
    Invasion of surgical margin (n = 7422) (n = 767) (n = 177)
    Sm (+) with tumor exposure 516 (7.0%) 144 (18.8%) 23 (13.0%)
    Sm (−) distance unknown 2930 (39.5%) 330 (43.0%) 69 (39.0%)
    Sm (−) 0 mm 548 (7.4%) 42 (5.5%) 16 (9.0%)
    Sm (−) ≤5 mm 2027 (27.3%) 130 (16.9%) 38 (21.5%)
    Sm (−) ≤10 mm 793 (10.7%) 50 (6.5%) 17 (9.6%)
    Sm (−) >10 mm 608 (8.2%) 71 (9.3%) 14 (7.9%)
    Findings in non-cancerous liver parenchyma: Fibrosis (n = 6335) (n = 493) (n = 144)
    f0 (nl) 847 (13.4%) 254 (51.5%) 23 (16.0%)
    f1 1164 (18.4%) 117 (23.7%) 23 (16.0%)
    f2 1170 (18.5%) 49 (9.9%) 26 (18.1%)
    f3 1158 (18.3%) 33 (6.7%) 30 (20.8%)
    f4 (lc) 1996 (31.5%) 40 (8.1%) 42 (29.2%)
    Findings in non-cancerous liver parenchyma: Activity (n = 4188) (n = 352) (n = 104)
    a0 852 (20.3%) 190 (54.0%) 27 (26.0%)
    a1 2004 (47.9%) 97 (27.6%) 49 (47.1%)
    a2 1202 (28.7%) 59 (16.8%) 24 (23.1%)
    a3 130 (3.1%) 6 (1.7%) 4 (3.8%)
    • Note: For all parameters, n is the total number of patients, excluding those in the “unknown” category, and (%) is the percentage of n.
    • Abbreviations: b0, absence of invasion of the bile ducts; b1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the third order or more peripheral branches of the bile duct, but not of second order branches; b2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the second order branches of the bile duct; b3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the first order branches of the bile duct; b4, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the common hepatic duct; vp0, absence of invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the portal vein; vp1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) distal to the second order branches of the portal vein, but not of the second order branches; vp2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) second order branches of the portal vein; vp3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) first order branches of the portal vein; vp4, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the main trunk of the portal vein and/or contra-lateral portal vein branch to the primarily involved lobe; vv0, absence of invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the hepatic vein; vv1, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) peripheral branches of the hepatic vein; vv2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the right, middle, or left hepatic vein, the inferior right hepatic vein, or the short hepatic vein; vv3, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) the inferior vena cava; va0, absence of invasion of the hepatic artery; va1, invasion distal to the second order branches of the hepatic artery, but not of the second order branches; va2, invasion to the second order branches of the hepatic artery; va3, invasion to the left or right hepatic artery, or the proper hepatic artery; im (−), absence of intrahepatic metastasis; im (+), presence of intrahepatic metastasis; P0, absence of dissemination to the peritoneum; P1, presence of dissemination to the adjacent peritoneum (cranial to transverse colon, greater omentum to be included); P2, dissemination to the remote peritoneum detected.

    Recurrence

    Recurrence during the survey period (within 2 years of diagnosis) was reported in 7606 patients with HCC (51.8%). The most frequently performed treatment for intrahepatic recurrence was TACE in 36.3%, followed by local ablation therapy in 26.2% and HAIC in 513.%. The most common sites of extrahepatic recurrence were the lungs, bone, lymph nodes, peritoneum, adrenal glands, and brain, in that order. The most frequently performed treatments for extrahepatic recurrence were molecular targeted therapy, radiation therapy, and resection, in that order.

    Autopsy

    Autopsies were carried out for 63 patients, and HCC was found in 45 patients. The most common sites of distant metastasis were lymph node, lung, peritoneal organs, bone, and adrenal glands, in that order.
    • II.

      OS and cumulative survival rates

    OS and cumulative survival rates from the 18th to 23rd surveys (2004–2015)

    OS and cumulative survival rates were calculated for patients with HCC, ICC, and combined HCC who were newly registered in the surveys from 2004 to 2015, and whose final outcome was survival or death (excluding unknown).

    OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC in all cases

    Table 24 shows median OS and cumulative survival rates among the 94 289 patients with HCC registered between 2004 and 2015. The median OS was 67.22 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 53.6% and 27.8% (Table 24, Supplementary Figure S1).

    TABLE 24. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Survival rate (%) (year)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (months) 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Suppl Figure S1 All patients 94 289 67.22 83.8 74.3 66.5 59.7 53.6 47.4 41.3 36.1 32.0 27.8
    Figure 1 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 65 570 80.36 90.0 81.9 74.6 67.9 61.5 54.7 47.9 41.9 37.3 32.3
    Child–Pugh B 16 822 30.39 70.6 56.0 45.4 37.4 31.8 26.4 21.7 18.4 15.2 12.8
    Child–Pugh C 3244 4.63 35.6 23.4 17.8 15.5 14.0 12.5 11.4 9.9 9.3 8.6
    Figure 2 TNM stage Stage I 13 611 156.45 96.1 90.7 85.9 80.8 74.8 68.4 61.4 52.9 52.9 52.9
    Stage II 22 957 90.22 92.2 85.2 78.2 72.5 66.7 60.2 52.7 48.5 41.6 41.6
    Stage III 12 747 50.04 81.1 67.5 57.7 51.0 45.3 39.3 33.6 28.7 28.7 19.1
    Stage IV A 4485 10.64 47.6 32.2 25.9 22.6 20.1 17.8 16.3 13.5 13.5 13.5
    Stage IV B 1563 4.63 27.2 15.7 10.9 8.7 7.7 6.3 3.0 - - -
    Figure 3 mALBI grade 1 3541 102.87 92.9 86.4 81.1 75.9 70.8 65.1 58.3 52.8 48.1 42.8
    2a 21 266 71.43 88.3 79.8 71.7 64.3 56.9 49.4 42.9 35.8 31.1 26.3
    2b 29 364 39.49 77.1 63.7 52.8 43.7 36.9 30.5 24.8 20.6 17.3 14.2
    3 6180 10.41 47.5 33.3 24.7 20.1 17.2 14.3 12.5 10.6 9.7 8.9
    Figure 4 Combination of Child–Pugh grade and TNM stage (JIS score) 0 10 443 156.45 97.8 94.0 90.2 85.9 80.8 74.1 67.4 57.8 57.8 57.8
    1 20 379 97.58 94.2 87.8 81.2 75.7 69.5 62.7 54.7 50.3 43.1 43.1
    2 12 804 58.87 85.3 72.9 62.8 55.4 49.6 43.1 36.8 31.8 31.8 15.9
    3 5167 19.68 63.9 45.1 35.0 29.8 26.3 23.1 19.3 18.8 18.8 -
    4 2411 6.93 35.5 21.1 16.2 13.4 11.5 8.9 6.7 - - -
    5 908 2.20 13.0 7.0 4.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    6 162 0.95 7.1 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 - - - -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    TABLE 25. Cumulative survival rates for resected hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (month) 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Suppl Figure S2 All patients 35 125 99.78 91.7 85.2 79.4 74.2 69.1 62.8 56.8 51.5 47.4 42.5
    Age at admission (years) 0∼39 416 - 89.1 79.3 73.5 70.5 67.9 63.3 61.0 58.4 53.1 53.1
    40∼59 5000 140.62 91.4 85.0 80.2 75.9 72.7 68.2 65.1 61.5 58.7 53.8
    60∼79 23 208 94.03 91.8 85.3 79.3 73.9 68.6 62.1 55.0 49.4 44.6 38.5
    ≥80 2670 72.25 89.7 80.2 71.4 65.9 57.1 50.1 41.2 32.7 22.7 17.0
    Gender Male 26 937 97.25 91.5 85.0 79.1 73.9 68.8 62.2 55.9 50.5 46.3 41.5
    Female 8188 111.41 92.2 85.8 80.4 75.2 70.4 64.9 59.8 55.0 51.2 45.8
    Figure 5 Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 7415 119.20 96.8 93.6 89.6 84.9 80.0 73.3 66.6 59.6 55.2 49.7
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 8416 112.43 95.5 90.9 85.7 80.5 75.2 68.1 61.4 56.4 52.3 46.1
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 9257 96.92 92.8 85.9 80.0 74.2 69.0 61.9 56.1 50.7 45.4 41.3
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 6678 80.03 86.5 77.0 70.0 64.0 58.7 53.7 47.9 44.2 41.7 37.2
    >10 cm 2585 38.57 74.5 60.5 51.7 48.0 45.4 41.7 38.4 33.4 32.4 31.3
    Figure 6 No. tumors 1 26 703 112.03 93.4 87.9 82.9 78.3 73.3 67.2 61.1 55.6 51.6 46.3
    2 4779 81.74 90.2 82.0 74.9 68.0 62.2 54.8 48.7 44.4 39.5 35.3
    ≥3 3002 46.92 80.4 67.8 57.6 49.4 45.3 39.2 33.7 29.5 26.8 24.5
    Figure 7 Portal vein invasion Vp0 28 710 106.97 94.3 89.0 83.4 78.1 72.9 66.1 59.5 53.8 49.6 44.4
    Vp1 3507 80.56 85.2 73.4 66.5 61.0 56.9 52.6 49.0 45.3 42.0 38.5
    Vp2 926 36.96 71.1 55.7 50.4 46.8 42.9 41.0 38.9 36.9 34.2 28.3
    Vp3 687 24.84 64.2 50.4 42.0 35.6 33.1 29.6 25.7 23.7 21.0 21.0
    Vp4 347 14.09 54.4 32.5 23.3 22.0 19.2 15.8 15.8 15.8 8.8 8.8
    Capsular invasion Fc-Inf (−) 12 831 106.02 94.2 89.0 84.0 78.8 73.0 65.9 59.8 54.1 49.8 44.0
    Fc-Inf (+) 12 229 93.83 90.1 82.1 75.5 69.9 65.2 59.6 53.6 49.0 45.0 41.1
    Figure 8 AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 16 423 113.35 95.7 91.3 86.5 81.7 76.5 70.1 62.9 57.6 52.6 47.2
    >10 to ≤200 10 142 88.41 92.1 84.8 78.4 72.4 66.6 59.4 52.7 45.9 41.8 37.8
    >200 to ≤400 1457 88.34 89.4 81.8 75.3 68.4 62.9 57.7 52.8 47.5 45.4 36.7
    >400 to ≤1000 1642 80.95 86.3 76.6 68.1 64.0 59.2 53.4 49.4 45.1 42.9 36.6
    >1000 to ≤10000 2644 80.95 82.0 71.7 64.2 59.3 56.1 51.8 49.2 46.2 43.9 41.5
    >10 000 1108 42.74 73.7 59.5 52.7 46.6 44.6 41.3 39.7 36.2 32.9 30.2
    Figure 9 AFP-L3 fraction (%) <10 10 702 111.93 95.4 90.6 85.4 80.4 75.0 68.8 61.6 56.3 51.4 47.1
    ≥10 5505 82.66 84.9 74.3 67.6 62.6 58.7 53.9 49.5 45.4 43.4 38.5
    Figure 10 PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <40 11 775 117.16 96.3 92.4 88.2 83.9 79.0 72.0 65.3 59.2 54.6 49.4
    ≥40 to <300 4492 96.92 92.9 86.3 80.5 74.7 69.1 61.4 56.0 50.5 46.8 43.5
    ≥300 to <500 1719 82.23 90.9 83.8 77.3 70.3 64.9 58.9 48.9 43.8 41.6 35.9
    ≥500 to <1000 2015 90.84 90.3 82.3 75.2 68.0 63.0 59.0 51.9 48.4 38.1 36.3
    ≥1000 8132 71.16 83.4 72.1 64.1 58.5 53.9 49.5 44.9 41.6 38.9 32.9
    HBsAg, HCV-Ab HBsAg (−) HCV-Ab (−) 12 019 102.93 91.7 85.1 79.2 74.6 70.2 63.5 57.0 52.3 48.2 44.3
    HBsAg (−) HCV-Ab (+) 15 044 85.82 91.6 84.8 78.6 72.3 65.9 58.7 51.0 44.4 39.9 34.9
    HBsAg (+) HCV-Ab (−) 5690 216.54 91.6 85.6 80.6 76.8 74.1 70.0 67.1 64.6 61.6 57.0
    HBsAg (+) HCV-Ab (+) 492 115.02 89.7 85.4 81.1 77.2 70.1 64.9 61.4 55.8 53.9 46.7
    Non-cancerous tissue finding nl 1484 111.93 92.5 84.0 77.1 73.7 68.5 63.1 58.2 55.0 51.5 48.8
    ch, lf 7496 106.64 92.3 85.3 79.5 73.7 68.3 62.7 57.4 53.2 49.4 44.7
    lc 6009 71.85 89.4 81.8 73.9 64.9 57.8 49.9 44.0 38.4 34.5 30.8
    Procedure Extended lobectomy 680 46.39 73.7 60.2 55.4 48.6 43.9 42.7 40.3 36.6 34.4 32.9
    Lobectomy 7090 84.04 84.2 74.6 67.5 63.2 59.4 54.4 50.1 46.3 42.5 38.6
    Segmentectomy 8105 112.43 92.6 86.5 81.2 76.7 71.6 65.3 59.7 55.7 51.4 44.9
    Sub-segmentectomy 7776 113.12 95.1 89.8 84.8 80.1 74.8 69.0 62.4 55.8 52.2 47.5
    Partial resection 10 228 95.41 94.7 89.3 83.4 76.7 71.1 63.2 56.0 49.9 45.3 40.2
    Curability Curability A or B 29 128 107.99 93.9 88.1 82.6 77.4 72.4 65.9 59.3 54.0 49.9 44.7
    Curability C 2933 29.24 69.6 54.2 45.7 39.3 35.3 31.7 29.1 25.2 23.1 20.3
    Figure 11 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 29 867 104.48 92.4 86.2 80.6 75.6 70.6 64.4 58.3 52.9 48.7 43.6
    Child–Pugh B 2625 66.04 83.2 73.2 65.7 58.3 53.6 45.7 39.8 35.5 31.2 26.5
    Child–Pugh C 36 23.03 65.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4
    Figure 12 mALBI grade 1 19 360 123.10 94.4 89.1 84.7 80.6 76.6 71.5 65.0 59.9 56.2 51.0
    2a 8561 90.15 91.3 84.9 78.1 72.4 66.5 59.1 53.5 47.8 42.6 37.1
    2b 6316 62.23 85.0 74.7 66.1 58.1 51.5 43.7 38.1 33.2 29.8 26.2
    3 332 45.37 68.8 59.3 52.6 49.0 43.8 33.4 26.3 24.1 21.4 21.4
    Figure 13 TNM stage I 4028 123.47 97.7 95.0 91.8 87.8 83.9 76.9 70.3 63.3 58.3 51.6
    II 17 030 114.30 95.4 90.7 85.6 81.1 75.8 69.6 62.8 56.9 52.9 47.5
    III 8033 77.57 88.0 78.6 71.3 64.5 59.6 52.9 47.3 43.0 39.5 35.7
    IV A 2369 34.43 74.5 58.3 49.7 44.0 39.9 35.5 33.0 29.7 26.2 23.7
    IV B 334 17.64 60.2 46.1 37.8 33.5 32.3 30.5 21.0 21.0 12.6 12.6
    Suppl Figure S3
    • ≤3 tumors,

    • tumor diameter ≤3 cm

    • Child–Pugh grade

    All patients 14 499 114.04 96.3 92.3 87.7 82.9 78.0 71.2 64.3 58.1 54.0 47.5
    Child–Pugh A 13 363 117.16 96.7 93.1 88.6 84.1 79.2 72.5 65.6 59.6 55.6 48.7
    Child–-Pugh B 1123 79.31 91.5 83.7 76.9 67.8 63.0 55.4 48.6 40.4 35.2 32.3
    Child–Pugh C 13 - 83.9 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7 64.7
    • Abbreviations: AFP, α-fetoprotein; OS, overall survival; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II; Vp0, absence of invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) the portal vein; Vp1, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) distal to the second order branches of the portal vein, but not of the second order branches; Vp2, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) second order branches of the portal vein; Vp3, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) first order branches of the portal vein; Vp4, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) the main trunk of the portal vein and/or contra-lateral portal vein branch to the primarily involved lobe.
    Median OS, and 5- and 10-year survival rates among the 94 289 patients with HCC registered between 2004 and 2015 according to Child–Pugh grade (Figure 1), TNM stage (Figure 2), mALBI grade (Figure 3),118-120 and Japan Integrated Staging score121, 122 (Figure 4) were created (Table 24, Figures 2-4).
    • (1)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for resected HCC (Table 25)

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for all hepatocellular carcinoma patients by Child–Pugh grade.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for all hepatocellular carcinoma patients by TNM stage.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for all hepatocellular carcinoma patients by modified albumin-bilirubin grade.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for all hepatocellular carcinoma patients by combining Child–Pugh grade and TNM stage (Japan Integrated Staging score).

    The median OS, and 5- and 10 year- survival rates in all resected patients (n = 35 125) were 99.78 months, and 69.1% and 42.5%, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2). The median OS and survival curves were created for patients with resected HCC grouped by maximum tumor diameter (Figure 5), number of tumors (Figure 6), extent of portal vein invasion (Figure 7), AFP level (Figure 8), AFP-L3 faction (Figure 9), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II level (Figure 10), hepatic functional reserve based on Child–Pugh grade (Figure 11), mALBI grade (Figure 12), and TNM stage (Figure 13; Table 25). Median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent resection was 104.48 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 70.6% and 43.6% (Table 25, Figure 11). TNM stage was well correlated with survival (Table 25, Figure 13). Maximum tumor diameter, number of tumors, extent of portal vein invasion, AFP, AFP-L3, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II, and TNM stage were also well correlated with survival (Table 25). The median OS for Child–Pugh grade A patients with up to three tumors with a maximum diameter ≤3 cm who underwent resection was 117.16 months (approximately 9.8 years), and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 78.0% and 47.5%, respectively (Table 25, Supplementary Figure S3). The median OS for patients with HCC was not reached (Supplementary Figure S4). The median OS for patients with HCC within the Milan criteria who underwent liver transplantation was not reached, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 76.9% and 70.5% (Table 26, Figure 14).
    • (2)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC treated with radiofrequency ablation therapy (Table 27)

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by maximum tumor diameter.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by number of tumors.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients by the extent of portal vein invasion.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by α-fetoprotein level (ng/mL).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by α-fetoprotein L3 fraction (%).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II level (m AU/mL).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by Child–Pugh grade. The median overall survival for Child–Pugh grade A patients who underwent resection was 104.48 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 70.6% and 43.6%.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by modified albumin-bilirubin grade.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected hepatocellular carcinoma patients by TNM stage.

    TABLE 26. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with liver transplantation.
    Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Suppl Figure 4 All patients 371 - 88.1 82.9 80.9 79.1 77.0 74.9 72.3 70.3 67.5 65.5
    Figure 14 Milan criteria ≤3 tumors ≤3 cm in diameter, or 1 tumor ≤5 cm in diameter 230 - 86.7 82.9 81.6 79.4 76.9 74.7 72.1 70.5 70.5 70.5
    Outside the criteria 104 - 90.8 82.1 78.0 78.0 76.0 73.4 70.4 67.2 57.3 57.3
    TABLE 27. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation therapy.
    Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Suppl Figure S5 All patients 20 578 80.30 95.8 89.0 81.8 73.3 65.0 56.2 47.5 40.5 34.4 28.3
    Figure 15 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 14 884 87.92 97.4 92.4 86.3 78.6 70.6 61.6 52.6 45.1 39.3 32.5
    Child–Pugh B 3869 53.72 90.9 77.3 65.5 54.6 45.0 36.7 29.8 25.1 19.0 14.6
    Child–Pugh C 248 26.94 77.6 54.9 42.1 32.3 19.7 15.5 10.6 - - -
    mALBI grade 1 7226 113.71 98.4 94.8 91.0 85.5 79.4 72.0 65.1 58.8 52.2 43.9
    2a 5024 82.33 97.2 92.6 86.1 78.0 68.0 58.4 48.6 39.0 34.3 28.2
    2b 7245 61.08 93.4 83.1 72.3 60.7 51.1 41.4 31.7 26.2 19.3 14.9
    3 779 34.96 85.8 62.9 49.3 35.6 28.3 23.0 19.7 14.1 14.1 12.3
    Figure 16 No. tumors 1 15 625 84.50 96.1 89.5 82.9 75.1 67.3 59.0 50.3 43.3 37.5 30.4
    2 3306 73.36 95.2 87.6 79.5 69.9 60.2 50.5 42.3 35.0 27.7 23.6
    3 948 63.47 94.0 86.0 75.5 62.9 52.2 42.3 33.9 28.1 21.3 20.3
    4 225 66.17 95.0 85.1 76.1 65.9 54.9 39.9 29.1 18.1 14.5 14.5
    ≥5 138 52.11 96.6 86.8 70.0 55.0 46.6 28.1 17.3 17.3 17.3 13.9
    Figure 17 Maximum tumor diameter ≤1 cm 1596 105.30 96.9 92.3 86.6 82.1 75.8 69.0 59.3 51.8 47.1 36.3
    >1 cm to ≤2 cm 8915 86.21 96.6 91.0 84.7 77.4 70.3 61.7 51.2 44.0 36.8 31.4
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 4379 75.43 95.3 87.7 79.2 70.2 62.1 52.6 44.8 36.4 30.4 24.2
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 1208 61.47 92.5 80.6 71.4 60.7 51.1 43.1 38.3 32.9 29.9 23.8
    >5 cm 162 62.92 86.9 74.1 70.0 62.1 50.9 46.6 36.2 30.7 27.6 18.4
    AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 9511 92.16 96.9 91.5 85.7 78.4 71.1 62.9 54.9 47.5 42.0 34.9
    >10 to ≤200 8498 73.30 95.5 88.3 80.1 71.0 61.7 51.2 41.5 35.0 28.4 23.6
    >200 to ≤400 785 74.64 94.5 83.6 74.5 63.6 57.1 51.4 40.3 26.4 21.2 16.9
    >400 to ≤1000 612 67.78 92.8 83.0 74.8 62.9 53.8 47.6 37.8 36.5 22.8 16.3
    >1000 to ≤10000 452 50.37 88.9 71.9 59.6 51.8 41.6 37.7 33.9 31.0 29.1 19.6
    >10000 36 52.11 84.5 69.5 69.5 52.5 43.0 43.0 28.7 28.7 28.7 28.7
    AFP-L3fraction (%) <10 9702 81.77 96.8 90.9 84.3 76.3 67.9 57.6 48.5 41.6 36.1 30.0
    ≥10 2221 67.52 92.6 81.3 71.3 62.0 54.9 46.9 37.9 30.0 22.2 16.7
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <100 12 132 87.95 97.3 92.4 86.5 79.4 71.5 62.7 53.1 45.7 39.1 32.2
    ≥100 to <300 2031 65.38 93.4 82.9 73.7 64.1 53.7 46.4 38.9 33.1 28.0 24.1
    ≥300 to <500 487 52.11 92.6 78.4 65.8 54.1 43.9 37.6 31.5 24.0 17.6 9.4
    ≥500 to <1000 416 60.12 90.9 78.9 66.4 54.6 51.0 42.8 35.6 31.9 31.9 31.9
    ≥1000 704 55.06 89.4 74.4 63.8 53.2 48.0 44.6 39.9 32.8 29.3 24.8
    Suppl Figure S6 ≤3 tumors, tumor diameter ≤3 cm Child–Pugh grade All patients 13 734 85.91 96.3 90.2 83.4 76.1 68.9 60.7 51.1 43.4 36.7 30.3
    Child–Pugh A 10 738 91.56 97.7 93.3 87.7 81.0 74.3 66.2 56.3 47.7 41.2 34.0
    Child–Pugh B 2822 58.09 91.6 79.3 67.9 58.1 49.1 40.5 32.3 28.3 21.1 17.4
    Child–Pugh C 174 29.34 77.7 56.2 47.8 35.0 19.2 15.4 10.3 - - -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    TABLE 28. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
    Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Suppl Figure S7 All patients 19 353 39.23 82.4 65.9 52.8 42.8 34.9 29.1 22.9 17.8 14.0 12.1
    Figure 18 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 12 292 47.44 87.0 72.4 59.9 49.3 40.6 33.7 26.8 20.6 15.8 13.9
    Child–Pugh B 4853 26.81 74.0 53.5 38.6 28.9 23.1 18.1 13.3 10.2 8.1 7.6
    Child–Pugh C 540 13.73 54.1 31.6 21.4 16.3 14.6 13.6 11.9 11.9 11.9 8.9
    Figure 19 mALBI grade 1 5346 60.55 90.0 77.4 68.0 58.7 50.4 43.7 35.3 29.5 23.0 21.6
    2a 4391 43.76 85.4 70.8 57.7 47.3 38.8 32.1 25.1 16.4 11.3 8.8
    2b 7984 30.59 79.1 59.5 43.4 32.2 24.6 19.2 14.5 11.2 9.7 7.9
    3 1371 17.58 62.3 40.1 26.2 19.5 15.1 12.0 9.5 8.1 7.2 6.3
    Figure 20 No. tumors 1 8288 52.11 86.9 73.8 62.7 52.8 45.4 39.2 31.5 24.5 19.3 17.2
    2 3736 41.23 86.1 70.5 55.3 44.9 34.9 28.1 21.5 16.3 11.4 11.4
    3 2123 35.78 84.8 66.0 49.6 38.5 30.4 22.3 15.0 10.1 7.7 7.7
    4 1077 33.05 86.5 66.5 47.4 33.5 25.8 21.4 17.8 16.6 12.9 7.7
    >5 3620 20.50 68.2 44.7 31.9 23.4 16.7 13.3 11.1 8.9 7.8 5.3
    Figure 21 Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 5074 57.10 92.9 81.9 67.9 57.3 47.8 40.8 34.0 26.8 20.4 19.0
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 4434 46.36 90.2 74.0 59.9 48.6 38.9 32.3 25.0 19.2 15.7 13.7
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 4783 34.99 83.0 62.8 49.5 38.2 30.7 25.1 18.9 15.0 11.6 9.2
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 3421 22.18 67.9 47.8 35.6 28.3 23.3 18.9 14.0 10.9 8.5 6.7
    >10 cm 1070 12.06 50.7 33.4 25.3 19.6 15.6 12.3 10.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
    Figure 22 Portal vein invasion Image-Vp0 16 591 42.74 86.4 70.5 56.6 45.8 37.5 31.2 24.5 19.1 15.2 13.4
    Image-Vp1 576 19.06 67.1 42.1 28.7 21.4 14.5 11.6 9.9 6.6 - -
    Image-Vp2 548 11.24 48.2 22.4 16.6 11.1 6.8 3.6 3.6 - - -
    Image-Vp3 480 6.67 33.6 15.5 11.2 10.6 9.3 5.2 5.2 - - -
    Image-Vp4 195 5.98 26.1 11.5 8.5 4.7 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
    Figure 23 AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 6613 52.90 90.3 77.7 65.0 54.2 45.8 37.9 29.7 23.4 17.1 15.7
    >10 to ≤200 7090 39.36 86.5 68.5 53.4 42.2 33.6 28.0 21.0 16.0 13.4 11.1
    >200 to ≤400 1098 31.05 79.5 57.7 44.4 33.1 25.1 20.8 17.9 12.7 8.1 6.1
    >400 to ≤1000 1094 27.30 71.8 54.2 40.8 31.9 24.9 21.9 18.0 14.1 11.3 9.4
    >1000 to ≤10000 1653 18.89 63.8 43.2 32.4 25.9 20.9 18.2 16.3 12.6 10.9 9.4
    >10000 677 11.50 48.4 26.1 19.1 15.6 11.0 7.3 6.4 3.7 3.7 3.7
    AFP-L3fraction (%) <10 5104 45.67 88.6 74.0 59.4 48.5 38.8 31.8 24.6 20.0 15.8 13.5
    ≥10 3356 24.44 71.5 50.3 37.7 30.0 23.0 18.5 15.0 11.5 9.6 8.8
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <40 5581 59.01 92.6 81.2 68.8 59.2 49.4 41.9 35.2 28.7 23.0 20.9
    ≥40 to <300 2511 37.72 86.6 67.0 51.5 40.8 30.7 23.5 15.8 10.8 9.1 7.7
    ≥300 to <500 964 33.31 83.1 62.9 46.8 34.5 26.0 19.5 15.8 9.8 8.1 8.1
    ≥500 to <1000 1114 28.75 80.4 57.4 43.7 34.5 28.7 20.0 15.4 12.1 9.7 8.5
    ≥1000 4504 19.06 63.9 43.6 32.4 24.4 20.5 17.3 13.9 11.1 8.2 6.6
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    TABLE 29. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma with one-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.
    Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (months) 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    All patients 1116 7.23 39.4 27.4 21.9 17.3 15.1 11.0 7.0 1.9 1.9 -
    Suppl Figure S8 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 518 11.40 48.8 36.4 29.3 22.2 18.1 12.7 7.6 2.5 2.5 -
    Child–Pugh B 411 4.90 28.8 16.7 13.9 11.6 11.6 8.1 8.1 - - -
    Child–Pugh C 98 4.30 32.5 21.7 14.7 14.7 12.2 12.2 6.1 - - -
    mALBI grade 1 181 19.98 58.8 48.4 41.4 35.4 29.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 -
    2a 186 10.41 45.1 29.7 25.0 19.3 16.6 12.4 8.3 - - -
    2b 552 5.95 35.3 23.3 18.6 13.9 12.9 11.3 3.8 - - -
    3 178 4.60 28.2 19.7 12.2 10.7 9.1 6.1 6.1 - - -
    No. tumors 1 280 11.96 49.8 40.7 38.5 29.6 25.2 16.8 8.4 - - -
    2 108 13.40 53.0 38.9 31.2 23.6 18.9 12.6 - - - -
    3 74 21.09 62.7 42.8 29.8 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 -
    4 29 7.39 43.0 23.9 15.9 8.0 - - - - - -
    >5 531 4.93 28.6 16.9 11.5 9.5 7.8 6.3 4.7 - - -
    Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 150 38.93 76.8 61.7 51.8 44.4 36.6 24.4 - - - -
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 115 20.93 62.9 41.7 30.5 22.9 22.9 - - - - -
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 169 12.91 51.8 35.2 26.3 20.5 17.5 8.8 8.8 - - -
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 302 5.32 27.1 17.8 14.6 9.7 8.5 6.4 6.4 2.1 2.1 -
    >10 cm 219 3.78 13.1 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 - - - -
    Figure 24 Portal vein invasion Image-Vp0 454 19.09 59.3 43.1 34.3 28.6 24.8 20.2 5.1 - - -
    Image-Vp1 44 7.46 36.1 20.6 15.5 - - - - - - -
    Image-Vp2 82 6.70 30.2 17.0 14.9 - - - - - - -
    Image-Vp3 210 3.94 21.4 13.1 11.4 8.2 8.2 4.1 - - - -
    Image-Vp4 262 3.52 18.9 12.2 9.8 6.8 5.7 4.3 4.3 1.4 1.4 -
    Figure 25 Hepatic vein invasion Image-Vv0 726 10.09 44.7 31.4 24.6 19.8 17.5 10.4 5.6 2.8 2.8 -
    Image-Vv1 40 5.06 18.1 18.1 18.1 - - - - - - -
    Image-Vv2 77 3.32 15.0 10.0 10.0 - - - - - - -
    Image-Vv3 91 3.68 21.3 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 - - -
    Extrahepatic spread Present 99 3.45 15.9 9.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 - - - - -
    Absent 566 6.90 38.8 26.4 21.4 18.0 16.6 8.9 - - - -
    AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 228 17.28 59.3 40.6 34.5 27.7 22.3 17.0 4.2 - - -
    >10 to ≤200 292 12.02 50.3 35.1 26.8 20.4 15.5 - - - - -
    >200 to ≤400 44 6.80 39.1 34.7 27.8 27.8 27.8 - - - - -
    >400 to ≤1000 68 6.41 32.9 22.2 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 - - -
    >1000 to ≤10000 179 6.05 31.1 19.7 19.7 13.9 13.9 11.1 11.1 3.7 3.7 -
    >10000 168 3.38 14.3 9.9 8.2 - - - - - - -
    AFP-L3 fraction (%) <10 182 14.98 53.9 38.6 32.1 27.8 23.5 17.1 - - - -
    ≥10 325 4.67 27.7 16.6 13.5 9.3 8.2 5.4 5.4 - - -
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <40 108 35.35 73.6 55.0 48.5 42.9 38.6 - - - - -
    ≥40 to <300 101 15.24 54.3 37.4 27.7 24.2 24.2 18.1 - - - -
    ≥300 to <500 39 11.27 47.8 31.9 25.5 12.7 6.4 - - - - -
    ≥500 to <1000 58 10.81 43.4 24.0 21.0 16.8 11.2 - - - - -
    ≥1000 629 4.70 25.3 16.0 12.0 6.8 6.8 5.5 5.5 1.8 1.8 -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    TABLE 30. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir.
    Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (months) 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    All patients 1436 8.11 40.1 20.6 14.4 10.7 8.2 6.1 5.3 3.5 2.8 2.8
    Figure 26 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 774 12.25 50.4 26.4 18.0 13.6 10.3 6.5 5.7 4.3 4.3 4.3
    Child–Pugh B 479 5.42 28.0 13.4 9.1 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 2.5 2.5
    Child–Pugh C 76 3.12 14.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 - - -
    mALBI grade 1 280 13.86 55.4 28.8 22.3 20.0 17.3 13.5 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2
    2a 296 11.33 47.1 25.1 16.7 9.3 8.3 4.2 4.2 - - -
    2b 668 6.80 34.2 17.4 12.6 8.9 5.2 4.5 4.5 3.4 2.2 2.2
    3 165 4.07 25.9 13.0 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 - - -
    No. tumors 1 283 11.30 47.7 22.8 16.1 13.9 9.4 8.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
    2 121 8.57 42.6 26.0 19.6 11.4 11.4 5.7 - - - -
    3 69 15.18 55.6 37.8 30.4 20.2 20.2 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5
    4 33 11.76 47.8 32.4 32.4 32.4 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.2 16.2
    >5 779 6.97 37.6 18.0 11.4 9.2 7.4 6.1 5.4 2.7 1.3 1.3
    Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 59 21.62 65.2 49.2 45.4 37.8 33.6 22.4 - - - -
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 74 18.37 63.9 38.3 35.4 22.1 14.7 14.7 14.7 - - -
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 212 14.85 57.0 31.8 23.5 19.7 13.8 9.2 9.2 9.2 6.1 6.1
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 502 8.51 40.0 18.9 12.1 7.9 5.8 4.6 4.6 2.3 2.3 2.3
    >10 cm 370 6.08 27.8 12.1 5.5 5.5 3.9 3.0 - - - -
    Figure 27 Portal vein invasion Image-Vp0 326 14.23 55.6 32.7 22.8 15.8 14.9 8.8 7.3 7.3 4.9 4.9
    Image-Vp1 58 10.45 46.4 24.7 14.1 9.4 9.4 - - - - -
    Image-Vp2 144 12.06 50.1 28.3 15.9 13.9 7.4 7.4 3.7 - - -
    Image-Vp3 379 6.87 35.7 18.7 13.7 10.5 6.8 6.8 6.8 4.5 4.5 4.5
    Image-Vp4 478 5.72 28.1 10.5 8.1 4.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 - - -
    Figure 28 Hepatic vein invasion Image-Vv0 944 9.86 44.6 22.4 15.5 11.3 9.0 5.9 4.6 4.6 3.5 3.5
    Image-Vv1 56 7.79 40.1 25.6 15.4 5.1 5.1 5.1 - - - -
    Image-Vv2 123 4.93 26.6 14.3 8.0 6.4 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
    Image-Vv3 139 6.74 31.1 15.6 10.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 - - -
    extrahepatic spread Present 125 4.53 21.0 14.2 5.5 - - - - - - -
    Absent 634 9.13 43.3 19.7 12.7 12.0 10.2 6.6 6.6 - - -
    AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 199 14.78 59.1 32.4 25.2 17.8 15.8 7.9 5.9 4.0 4.0 4.0
    >10 to ≤200 336 12.62 50.3 27.6 17.1 12.8 9.1 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
    >200 to ≤400 93 7.49 36.7 14.4 10.8 5.4 5.4 - - - - -
    >400 to ≤1000 100 6.83 34.7 19.4 13.6 9.3 7.0 7.0 7.0 - - -
    >1000 to ≤10000 277 7.82 39.9 19.1 15.4 10.0 7.2 4.8 2.4 2.4 - -
    >10 000 223 5.39 25.9 13.3 8.9 8.9 7.5 7.5 7.5 5.0 5.0 5.0
    AFP-L3 fraction (%) <10 242 15.21 56.3 33.7 24.9 15.9 11.8 11.8 8.9 4.4 4.4 4.4
    ≥10 571 6.60 32.4 15.4 9.7 8.3 5.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 2.9 2.9
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <40 96 20.47 64.3 42.9 32.1 29.6 24.7 13.2 13.2 13.2 6.6 6.6
    ≥40 to <300 91 11.04 48.5 30.5 30.5 24.6 13.7 13.7 6.8 - - -
    ≥300 to <500 54 13.77 55.0 35.7 29.1 18.2 10.9 7.3 - - - -
    ≥500 to <1000 89 8.38 41.0 23.6 15.0 11.2 7.5 - - - - -
    ≥1000 933 7.00 35.0 15.0 8.9 6.2 4.9 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 3.0
    • Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; Vp0, absence of invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) the portal vein; Vp1,invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) distal to the second order branches of the portal vein, but not of the second order branches; Vp2, invasion of (or tumor thrombus in) second order branches of the portal vein; Vp3, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) first order branches of the portal vein; Vp4, invasion of(or tumor thrombus in) the main trunk of the portal vein and/or contra-lateral portal vein branch to the primarily involved lobe.
    TABLE 31. Cumulative survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy (molecular targeted therapy).
    Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    All patients 1171 10.09 45.7 29.7 20.1 17.9 17.3 5.2 - - - -
    Figure 29 Child–Pugh grade Child–Pugh A 815 12.35 50.4 32.9 22.3 20.7 19.9 5.8 - - - -
    Child–Pugh B 271 6.31 33.6 21.0 13.1 9.2 9.2 - - - - -
    Child–Pugh C 17 3.48 23.5 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 - - - - -
    mALBI grade 1 410 14.78 57.2 38.3 26.6 25.0 23.5 6.7 - - - -
    2a 268 10.74 47.4 28.7 19.1 14.7 - - - - - -
    2b 438 7.39 36.0 23.7 15.6 13.7 13.7 - - - - -
    3 45 4.93 24.1 13.8 6.9 6.9 6.9 - - - - -
    No. tumors 1 328 14.06 54.8 36.0 28.8 26.1 26.1 26.1 - - - -
    2 118 18.46 56.2 42.4 34.5 21.6 16.2 - - - - -
    3 77 18.89 56.2 45.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 - - - - -
    4 42 22.21 58.4 48.9 20.0 20.0 - - - - - -
    >5 500 7.95 35.7 19.8 10.5 9.9 9.9 - - - - -
    Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 80 29.40 71.0 57.1 48.2 38.1 38.1 - - - - -
    >2 cm to ≤3 cm 93 23.52 60.7 48.2 39.8 39.8 39.8 - - - - -
    >3 cm to ≤5 cm 188 20.04 65.5 48.0 26.5 22.0 22.0 - - - - -
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 399 9.10 41.9 22.3 11.2 10.6 9.3 4.6 - - - -
    >10 cm 289 6.97 30.8 19.7 16.9 13.9 13.9 - - - - -
    Figure 30 Portal vein invasion Image-Vp0 580 16.36 58.2 40.1 25.8 22.9 21.3 10.6 - - - -
    Image-Vp1 70 16.23 64.1 39.5 33.7 33.7 33.7 - - - - -
    Image-Vp2 117 7.75 29.4 17.9 11.6 8.7 8.7 - - - - -
    Image-Vp3 182 6.08 33.8 15.8 11.1 8.0 8.0 - - - - -
    Image-Vp4 167 5.19 20.7 14.3 10.4 10.4 - - - - - -
    Suppl Figure S9 Hepatic vein invasion Image-Vv0 824 12.29 50.3 34.6 23.6 20.8 19.7 6.6 - - - -
    Image-Vv1 61 11.07 48.0 26.9 17.3 17.3 - - - - - -
    Image-Vv2 108 5.95 27.1 17.7 7.6 7.6 - - - - - -
    Image-Vv3 104 6.83 35.1 16.1 13.8 10.4 - - - - - -
    Suppl Figure S10 Extrahepatic spread Absent 668 14.49 56.1 36.7 24.5 22.3 21.0 7.0 - - - -
    Present 440 6.57 31.1 19.4 13.9 13.2 13.2 - - - - -
    Figure 31 Vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread Absent 322 25.92 72.5 51.6 32.2 28.3 25.5 12.7 - - - -
    Present 795 7.52 34.6 20.8 15.4 14.1 14.1 - - - - -
    • Vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread

    • Absent (Child–Pugh grade)

    All patients 309 25.79 73.1 51.4 32.0 28.0 25.2 12.6 - - - -
    Child–Pugh A 251 25.92 75.0 51.9 31.8 29.2 26.3 13.1 - - - -
    Child–Pugh B 57 24.97 66.1 50.1 34.7 17.4 - - - - - -
    Child–Pugh C 1 0.89 - - - - - - - - - -
    • Vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread Present

    • (by Child–Pugh grade)

    All patients 756 7.59 34.6 20.8 15.4 14.1 14.1 - - - - -
    Child–Pugh A 535 8.90 38.5 23.9 18.1 16.9 16.9 - - - - -
    Child–Pugh B 206 5.19 25.5 13.0 8.1 6.1 6.1 - - - - -
    Child–Pugh C 15 3.48 20.0 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 - - - - -
    AFP (ng/mL) ≤10 202 21.85 61.9 44.5 30.3 26.3 26.3 - - - - -
    >10 to ≤200 322 13.80 54.2 36.8 23.1 20.0 20.0 - - - - -
    >200 to ≤400 75 13.04 50.3 33.3 22.2 16.6 16.6 - - - - -
    >400 to ≤1000 92 13.70 52.6 40.1 31.9 31.9 23.9 23.9 - - - -
    >1000 to ≤10000 200 7.39 35.0 19.3 10.1 8.7 8.7 - - - - -
    >10000 160 5.19 24.6 12.8 9.2 - - - - - - -
    AFP-L3fraction (%) <10 206 15.21 57.5 41.1 29.5 23.6 23.6 23.6 - - - -
    ≥10 407 8.18 39.9 26.1 17.6 15.7 15.7 - - - - -
    PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) <40 122 19.65 61.3 43.3 35.0 30.0 - - - - - -
    ≥40 to <300 101 15.77 61.7 35.5 21.4 21.4 14.3 - - - - -
    ≥300 to <500 42 11.40 45.7 34.1 34.1 34.1 - - - - - -
    ≥500 to <1000 72 25.92 67.4 53.2 29.3 24.4 24.4 - - - - -
    ≥1000 716 7.75 36.5 22.0 14.4 13.1 13.1 - - - - -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves of liver transplantation patients within or outside the Milan criteria.

    The median OS for all patients who received radiofrequency ablation (n = 20 578) was 80.30 months (Supplementary Figure S5). The median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent radiofrequency ablation was 87.92 months (approximately 7.3 years), and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 70.6% and 32.5% (Figure 15). The number of tumors and tumor diameter were well correlated with cumulative survival rate (Table 27, Figures 16 and 17). The median OS for Child–Pugh grade A patients with up to three tumors with a maximum diameter ≤3 cm who underwent radiofrequency ablation therapy was 91.56 months (approximately 7.6 years), and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 74.3% and 34.0% (Table 27, Supplementary Figure S6).
    • (3)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC treated with TACE (Table 28)

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiofrequency ablation by Child–Pugh grade. The median overall survival for Child–Pugh grade A patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation therapy was 87.92 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 70.6% and 32.5%.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiofrequency ablation therapy by number of tumors.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiofrequency ablation therapy by maximum tumor diameter.

    The median OS for all patients who received TACE (n = 19 353) was 39.23 months (Supplementary Figure S7). The median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent TACE was 47.44 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 40.6% and 13.9% (Table 28; Figure 18). The mALBI grade, number of tumors, tumor size, degree of portal invasion, and serum AFP level were well correlated with survival outcome after TACE (Table 28, Figures 19-23).
    • (4)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC treated with one-shot HAIC (Table 29).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by Child–Pugh grade. The median overall survival for Child–Pugh grade A patients who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was 47.44 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 40.6% and 13.9%.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by modified albumin-bilirubin grade.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by number of tumors.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by maximum tumor diameter.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by portal vein invasion.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization by α-fetoprotein level.

    The median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent one-shot HAIC was 11.40 months, and 5-year survival rates were 18.1% (Supplementary Figure S8). The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the portal vein (Vp4) was 3.52 months (Figure 24). The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the hepatic vein/inferior vena cava (Vv3) was 3.68 months (Figure 25).
    • (5)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC treated with continuous HAIC using a reservoir (Table 30)

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with one-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy by the extent of portal vein invasion.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with one-shot hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy by the extent of hepatic vein invasion.

    The median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent HAIC using a reservoir was 12.25 months, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were 10.3% and 4.9% (Figure 26). The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the portal vein (Vp4) was 5.19 months (Figure 27). The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the hepatic vein/inferior vena cava (Vv3) was 6.74 months (Figure 28).
    • (6)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC treated with systemic chemotherapy (molecular targeted therapy; Table 31)

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir (implanted port system) by Child–Pugh grade.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir (implanted port system) by the extent of portal vein invasion.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a reservoir (implanted port system) by the extent of hepatic vein invasion.

    The median OS for patients with a Child–Pugh grade A who underwent systemic chemotherapy (molecular targeted therapy) was 12.35 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 19.9% (Figure 29).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with systemic therapy by Child–Pugh grade. The median overall survival for Child–Pugh grade A patients treated by systemic therapy was 12.35 months, and 5-year survival was 19.9%.

    The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the portal vein (Vp4) was 5.19 months (Figure 30). The median OS for patients with a tumor invasion in the main trunk of the hepatic vein/inferior vena cava was 6.83 months (Supplementary Figure S9). The median OS for patients with extrahepatic spread was 6.57 months (Supplementary Figure S10), and that for patients with vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread was 7.52 months (Figure 31).
    • (7)

      Median OS and cumulative survival rates for ICC and combined HCC

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with systemic therapy by the extent of portal vein invasion.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with systemic therapy by the presence or absence of vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread.

    Tables 32 and 33 show median OS and cumulative survival rates for patients with ICC (all patients and by patient factors) and patients with combined HCC and ICC (all patients). The median OS, 5-year and 10 year-survival rates for ICC who received resection was 56.34 months, and 48.3% and 26.5% (Supplementary Figure S11). The tumor diameter, the number of tumors, and CA 19-9 level were correlated with survival in ICC (Figures 32-35). The median OS, 5 year- and 10 year-survival rates for combined HCC and ICC treated by resection (n = 655) was 65.12 months, 53.4% and 33.7% (Figure 35).

    TABLE 32. Cumulative survival rates for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (months) 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    All patients 5748 21.45 62.5 47.7 40.4 36.6 33.0 29.2 25.8 22.2 19.9 17.9
    Suppl Figure S11 Resection Yes 3406 56.34 82.9 67.2 58.7 53.3 48.3 43.5 38.6 32.9 29.7 26.5
    No 171 45.31 74.6 59.9 51.8 48.2 41.8 36.2 33.2 29.9 19.9 19.9
    Figure 32 Resected: Maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm 446 94.49 92.7 82.6 74.2 69.2 65.6 61.0 57.2 49.8 46.0 46.0
    >2 cm to ≤5 cm 1736 67.42 86.8 71.4 62.2 56.4 52.3 46.3 40.9 35.8 30.8 28.1
    >5 cm to ≤10 cm 898 32.00 74.3 56.0 48.3 43.7 36.8 33.4 30.4 23.0 21.4 17.3
    >10 cm 158 19.78 63.1 39.9 31.8 30.1 18.8 15.1 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
    Figure 33 Resected: No. tumors 1 2869 65.48 85.2 70.5 62.5 57.1 52.1 47.3 42.7 37.1 33.2 29.3
    2 192 44.98 84.2 64.7 52.0 47.1 43.2 34.1 27.3 11.7 11.7 11.7
    ≥3 250 16.95 62.3 37.8 28.3 21.8 18.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 -
    Resection curability Curability A or B 380 71.79 87.7 76.6 68.6 66.0 57.9 48.6 45.5 33.6 29.4 22.1
    Curability C 597 25.03 69.1 50.6 39.0 34.8 31.5 28.6 28.6 23.8 13.0 13.0
    Resection metastasis N0 2499 74.74 87.9 74.9 66.2 61.0 56.1 50.6 46.1 39.5 35.0 31.2
    N1 732 18.60 65.8 40.4 33.2 26.8 23.1 20.4 16.5 15.4 15.4 15.4
    CEA (ng/ml) ≦9.9 2638 65.28 85.5 70.7 61.7 56.3 51.2 46.3 41.1 35.3 31.2 27.2
    ≦9.9 186 25.20 72.9 50.9 36.6 30.8 21.2 15.9 15.9 - - -
    ≦49.9 121 18.60 62.9 45.2 39.3 34.8 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.3
    ≦99.9 58 16.85 71.1 35.3 30.2 30.2 30.2 30.2 - - - -
    ≧100 98 11.24 47.9 26.7 22.4 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6
    Figure 34 CA19-9 (U/ml) <37 1370 83.88 89.7 77.8 70.4 66.1 59.6 54.0 49.7 43.8 40.7 39.1
    ≦99 515 67.09 86.8 74.3 64.6 56.1 51.9 48.5 41.5 35.6 33.2 25.8
    ≦299 372 40.44 81.0 64.4 54.4 45.9 43.6 36.6 25.1 25.1 - -
    ≦999 291 27.40 78.0 52.7 40.1 33.1 29.4 26.4 23.1 19.8 16.5 8.8
    ≦2999 224 21.13 70.5 43.3 31.7 28.9 25.3 23.0 18.4 15.3 10.2 -
    ≦9999 139 14.65 58.6 32.1 25.4 23.4 18.6 14.9 14.9 - - -
    ≧10 000 149 12.62 51.3 23.2 13.1 13.1 6.5 6.5 - - - -
    TABLE 33. Cumulative survival rates for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma.
    Fig. No. Title Category name n Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Figure 35 All patients 980 29.70 65.3 53.0 46.7 43.2 40.0 36.2 32.9 30.8 28.0 26.0
    Hepatic resection Resection (+) 655 65.12 81.4 67.3 60.3 56.3 53.4 47.9 43.3 40.3 36.3 33.7
    Resection (−) 117 15.64 58.2 43.3 29.0 22.6 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients by maximum tumor diameter.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by number of tumors.

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by CA19-9 level (ng/mL).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Survival curves for patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by receiving resection or no resection.

    Changes in survival outcome over time

    1. Changes in survival outcome for HCC

      Cumulative survival rates were calculated by registration date for previously registered patients with HCC whose final outcome was survival or death (excluding unknown; Table 34). Patients were grouped into five time period groups by 8-year periods (with the exception of period 5, which is a 6-year period). Period 1 consisted of those registered in the fifth to eighth surveys (1978–1985), period 2 of those registered in the ninth to 12th surveys (1986–1993), period 3 of those registered in the 13th to 16th surveys (1994–2001), period 4 of those registered in the 17th to 20th surveys (2002–2009). and period 5 of those registered in the 21st to 23rd surveys (2010–2015). The median OS and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated for each of these groups (Table 34, Figure 36). The median OS and cumulative survival rates (5-year/10-year) were 5.03 months and 12.3%/5.2% for period 1 (1978–1985, n = 5570), 25.59 months and 25.5%/10.1% for period 2 (1986–1993, n = 32 720), 41.40 months and 38.3%/19.3% for period 3 (1994–2001, n = 63 862), 59.27 months and 49.6%/25.8% for period 4 (2002–2009, n = 65 862), and the 5-year survival rate was 63.4% for period 5 (2010–2015, n = 44 542). The number of new registrations has been increasing over time, and the prognosis of HCC is improving dramatically (Table 34, Figure 36).

    2. Changes in survival outcome for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

    TABLE 34. Cumulative survival rates from the 5th to 23rd surveys (1978–2015).
    Median OS (month) Survival rate, % (years)
    Fig. No. Title Category name n 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years 10 years
    Figure 36
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma:

    • All patients

    Registered in 5th to 8th surveys (1978–1985) 5570 5.03 34.2 23.7 18.6 15.3 12.3 10.0 8.6 7.3 6.0 5.2
    Registered in 9th to 12th surveys (1986–1993) 32,720 25.59 66.9 51.7 40.5 31.9 25.5 20.5 16.9 14.1 11.7 10.1
    Registered in 13th to 16th surveys (1994–2001) 63,232 41.40 78.3 65.0 54.2 45.4 38.3 32.9 28.4 24.7 21.7 19.3
    Registered in 17th to 20st surveys (2002–2009) 65,862 59.27 84.4 73.8 64.8 56.6 49.6 43.4 37.9 33.0 29.1 25.8
    Registered in 21st to 23rd surveys (2010–2015) 44,542 - 82.9 74.9 69.0 65.7 63.4 61.3 61.3 61.3 - -
    Figure 37
    • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma:

    • All patients

    Registered in 5th to 8th surveys (1978–1985) 340 3.71 21.3 15.0 12.0 12.0 11.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5
    Registered in 9th to 12th surveys (1986–1993) 1057 7.56 38.3 25.6 20.6 16.8 14.2 11.7 10.4 9.6 8.0 7.7
    Registered in 13th to 16th surveys (1994–2001) 2215 11.93 49.9 33.5 27.7 23.8 20.9 18.9 17.9 16.3 14.7 13.9
    Registered in 17th to 20st surveys (2002–2009) 3187 21.22 62.9 47.1 39.8 35.5 31.0 27.7 24.3 20.7 18.3 16.8
    Registered in 21st to 23rd surveys (2010–2015) 3263 20.14 61.1 47.1 40.3 37.2 36.1 - - - - -
    Figure 38
    • Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma:

    • All patients

    Registered in 5th to 8th surveys (1978–1985) 69 2.86 15.5 7.7 7.7 6.2 6.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
    Registered in 9th to 12th surveys (1986–1993) 126 19.55 61.9 35.8 29.0 23.7 22.6 21.4 18.7 17.3 17.3 17.3
    Registered in 13th to 16th surveys (1994–2001) 341 14.49 53.1 36.6 27.8 23.3 21.0 19.5 16.7 15.5 14.2 12.1
    Registered in 17th to 20st surveys (2002–2009) 502 24.11 65.8 50.4 42.5 38.7 34.5 31.5 28.8 26.1 23.4 22.2
    Registered in 21st to 23rd surveys (2010–2015) 588 36.17 64.0 54.0 50.0 48.6 47.3 - - - - -
    • Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
    Details are in the caption following the image

    Changes in survival over time for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cumulative overall survivals among patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 (n = 211 926) were compared by dividing them into five groups by registration date. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates (5-year/10-year) was 5.03 months and 12.3%/5.2% for period 1 (1978–1985, n = 5570), 25.59 months and 25.5%/10.1% for period 2 (1986–1993, n = 32 720), 41.40 months and 38.3%/19.3% for period 3 (1994–2001, n = 63 232), and 59.37 months, 49.1%/25.6% for period 4 (2002–2019, n = 65 862); median overall survival was not reached, and 5-year survival rate was 63.4% for period 5 (2010–2015, n = 44 542).

    The median OS and cumulative survival rates were calculated to determine how survival has changed over time in ICC. The median OS and survival rates (5-year/10-year) were 3.71 months and 11.4%/8.5% for period 1 (n = 340), 7.56 months and 14.2%/7.7% for period 2 (n = 1057), 11.93 months and 20.9%/13.9% for period 3 (n = 2215), 21.22 months and 31.0%/16.8 for period 4 (n = 3263), and the median OS was 20.14 months for period 5 (n = 3263). Survival in ICC has gradually improved over the years (Table 34, Figure 37).
    • 3.

      Changes in survival outcome for combined HCC and ICC

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Changes in survival over time for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 10 062 patients were registered between 1978 and 2015. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates (5-year/10-year) was 3.71 months and 11.4%/8.5% for period 1 (n = 340), 7.56 months and 14.2%/7.7% for period 2 (n = 1057), 11.93 months and 20.9%/13.9% for period 3 (n = 2215), 21.22 months and 31.3%/17.8% for period 4 (n = 31,87), and 28.94 months for period 5 (n = 3263).

    The median OS and cumulative survival rates were calculated to determine how survival has changed over time in combined HCC and ICC. Median OS and survival rates (5-year/10-year) were 2.86 months and 6.2%/3.1% for period 1 (n = 69), 19.55 months and 22.6%/17.3% for period 2 (n = 126), and 14.49 months and 21.0%/12.1% for period 3 (n = 341), 24.11 months and 34.5%/22.3% for period 4 (n = 502), and 36.17 months and 47.3% (5-year survival rate) for period 5 (n = 588; Table 34, Figure 38).

    Details are in the caption following the image

    Changes in survival over time for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 1626 patients were registered between 1978 and 2015. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates (5-year/10-year) were 2.86 months and 6.2%/3.1% for period 1 (n = 69), 19.55 months and 22.6%/17.3% for period 2 (n = 126), 14.49 months and 21.0%/12.1% for period 3 (n = 341), 24.11 months and 35.1%/22.3% for period 4 (n = 502), the median OS and 5-year survival were not available for period 5 (n = 369).

    CONCLUSION

    Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in Japan after lung cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The number of deaths from HCC peaked at 34 637 in 2002, and has continued to decrease gradually every year since. Nevertheless, it is reported that >24 000 people still die of HCC each year.122 Approximately 50% of the patients with primary liver cancer in Japan were newly registered in the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer.

    Compared with the 22nd survey, the population of patients with HCC in this survey was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, was less frequently positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus antibody, had smaller tumor diameters, and was more frequently treated with resection and with radiofrequency ablation as local ablation therapy. Calculation of the median OS and cumulative survival rates for patients newly registered in five time periods between 1978 and 2013 revealed marked improvement in survival outcome for HCC, which can be attributed to establishment of a nationwide surveillance system and advances in early diagnosis and treatment.122-124

    We believe that this large set of data from registered patients analyzed in this follow-up survey will advance research on and treatment outcomes of primary liver cancer in the world.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors express sincere gratitude to all the doctors at collaborating institutions across Japan who contributed to this Nationwide Follow-up Survey Study by the Japan Association of Liver Cancer (Formerly Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan).

      CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

      Dr Shoji Kudo, Dr Ryosuke Tateishi, and Dr Takamichi Murakami are Editorial Board members of Hepatology Research and coauthors of this article. To minimize bias, they were excluded from all editorial decision-making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. Dr Masayuki Kurosaki is Editor-in-Chief of the journal and a coauthor of this article. He was excluded from the peer-review process and all editorial decisions related to the acceptance and publication of this article. Peer-review was handled independently by Yoshiyuki Ueno of this manuscript to minimize bias. Dr Michiie Sakamoto is a former member of Hepatology Research Editorial Board and coauthor of this article.

      ETHICS STATEMENT

      Approval of the research protocol: Kindai University Ethics Committee 19-069.

      Informed Consent: Not necessary, as this was an observational study.

      Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.

      Animal Studies: N/A.

      Research involving recombinant DNA: N/A.

      DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

      The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

        The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.