Volume 27, Issue 2 pp. 211-220
REVIEW ARTICLE

Outcomes for studies assessing the efficacy of hemostatic therapies in persons with congenital bleeding disorders

Camila C. Aquino

Camila C. Aquino

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria Borg Debono

Victoria Borg Debono

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Anesthesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Federico Germini

Federico Germini

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Drashti Pete

Drashti Pete

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Christine L. Kempton

Christine L. Kempton

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Hemophilia of Georgia Center for Bleeding & Clotting Disorders of Emory, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Guy Young

Guy Young

Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Sidonio

Robert Sidonio

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stacy E. Croteau

Stacy E. Croteau

Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston Hemophilia Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amy L. Dunn

Amy L. Dunn

Hemophilia Treatment Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital and The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nigel S. Key

Nigel S. Key

Division of Hematology and Blood Research Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alfonso Iorio

Corresponding Author

Alfonso Iorio

Health Information Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Correspondence

Alfonso Iorio, CRL 140, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 February 2021
Citations: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Management strategies and hemostatic treatments to achieve control of bleeding are relevant across many disease areas. Identification of primary outcomes for studies assessing hemostatic intervention was the objective of a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) sponsored multidisciplinary initiative. The aim of this report is to summarize the evidence reviewed, and the outcomes identified by the subgroup tasked to assess outcomes for inherited bleeding disorders.

Methods

The subgroup decided to focus on haemophilia, the prototypal congenital bleeding disorder and the one with the largest available body of evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO, The Cochrane Review, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for systematic and narrative reviews on outcomes used in haemophilia clinical trials. Three different clinical goals were identified as typical objectives of future research.

Results

Out of 1322 unique citations, 24 reviews published in the period 2002–2019 were included. We identified 113 outcome measures, categorized in 6 domains: health-related quality of life (HRQoL), comorbidities and mortality, overall physical functioning and participation, bleeding and hemostasis, joint health, and costs and resource use. Three different clinical goals were identified as typical objectives of future research: Episodic ‘on demand’ replacement therapy, prevention of bleeding (Prophylaxis), and long-term and overall impact of bleeding. For each of these scenarios, specific outcomes were recommended.

Conclusions

Primary outcomes for clinical trials assessing the efficacy of hemostatic treatment in achieving control, prevention and limiting long-term consequences of bleeding in inherited bleeding disorders are suggested, and their strength and limitations discussed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Some authors have conflict of interest. Please see Appendix 2.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.