Volume 21, Issue 3 pp. 330-337
Original Article

FEIBA in the treatment of acquired haemophilia A: Results from the prospective multicentre French ‘FEIBA dans l'hémophilie A acquise’ (FEIBHAC) registry

J.-Y. Borg

Corresponding Author

J.-Y. Borg

Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM CIC-CRB 0204, Rouen, France

Correspondence: Jeanne-Yvonne Borg, MD, Haematology Laboratory, CHRU Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.

Tel.: +33 (2) 32 88 02 49; fax: +33 (2) 32 88 09 51;

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
C. Négrier

C. Négrier

Haemophilia Treatment Centre, Edouard Herriot Hospital, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
I. Durieu

I. Durieu

Department of Internal Medicine, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Pierre Bénite, France

Search for more papers by this author
E. Dolimier

E. Dolimier

Baxter S.A.S., Maurepas, France

Search for more papers by this author
A.-M. Masquelier

A.-M. Masquelier

Baxter S.A.S., Maurepas, France

Search for more papers by this author
H. Lévesque

H. Lévesque

Department of Internal Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, INSERM U1096 and INSERM CIC-CRB 0204, Rouen, France

Search for more papers by this author
for the FEIBHAC Study Group
First published: 31 October 2014
Citations: 29

Summary

Factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (FEIBA) is a recommended first-line bypassing agent for bleeding episodes in patients with acquired haemophilia A (AHA). Due to the low incidence of AHA, available clinical data on FEIBA treatment are limited. The study aim was to delineate practice patterns in FEIBA treatment of AHA patients, the haemostatic efficacy of FEIBA, including criteria for its assessment, and safety. A prospective registry was established of AHA patients receiving FEIBA for bleeding episodes or prophylaxis at the time of invasive procedures. Data were collected at 16 participating centres in France. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Haemostatic efficacy, FEIBA regimen and FEIBA-related adverse events were documented. Thirty-four patients averaging 81.8 years old with standard deviation (SD) 8.1 years were included in the study: 33 for acute bleeding and one for haematoma evacuation. The mean initial dose of FEIBA for acute bleeding was 75.4 U kg−1 (SD, 7.7 U kg−1), most often administered twice daily, and the median duration of FEIBA treatment was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 2.2–8.0 days). FEIBA was effective in managing 88.0% of bleeding episodes (95% confidence interval, 75.8–94.5%). No baseline variables influencing treatment response could be identified. The sensitivity and specificity of an objective haemostatic efficacy scale in predicting sequential investigator assessments of haemostatic efficacy were 45.3% and 84.1% respectively. Four patients experienced a total of six serious adverse events possibly related to FEIBA. In the first prospective study specifically focused on FEIBA treatment of patients with AHA, 88.0% of bleeding episodes were effectively managed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.