Volume 17, Issue 10 pp. 1463-1469
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLINICAL PRACTICE AND HEALTH

Mobility, balance and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: What is the best 1-year predictor of falls?

Anna Mulasso

Anna Mulasso

Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Mattia Roppolo

Corresponding Author

Mattia Roppolo

Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Correspondence: Dr Mattia Roppolo PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Via Verdi, 10, 10124 – Torino, Italy. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Robbert J Gobbens

Robbert J Gobbens

Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Zonnehuisgroep Amstelland, Amstelveen, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Emanuela Rabaglietti

Emanuela Rabaglietti

Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2016
Citations: 20

Abstract

Aim

The present study aimed, first, to compare the ability to predict falls over 12 months for three measures – mobility, balance and frailty. Second, among the three domains of frailty – physical, psychological and social – we investigated what is the strongest predictor of falls.

Methods

A total of 192 community-dwelling older adults (age 73.0 ± 6.2 years; 62% women) were involved in this longitudinal study. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, One Leg Standing (OLS) test and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) were respectively used to measure mobility, balance and frailty. The TFI is a questionnaire based on a multidimensional conceptualization of frailty consisting of 15 items in three domains (physical, psychological and social). Falls were self-reported during the 12-month follow up. Logistic regression models, adjusted for interesting variables, were carried out to predict the risk of falls.

Results

History of falls and chronic conditions were the indicators more strongly related with falls over 12 months. The TFI resulted as a stronger predictor of falls when compared with the TUG and OLS tests. The explained variance of the three models was 31.2%, 22.4% and 22.2%, respectively. The TFI was significantly associated with falls (P < 0.001), whereas the TUG and the OLS were not (P > 0.05). Among the three frailty domains, physical (P < 0.001) and psychological (P = 0.041) domains were significant predictors of falls.

Conclusions

The findings showed that the TFI might be an effective tool for predicting falls at 12 months in aged populations, probably because it is able to capture the multifactorial facets that can lead to falls. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1463–1469.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.