Volume 6, Issue 3 pp. 290-299
Original Research

GHG emissions of forest-biomass supply chains to commercial-scale liquid-biofuel production plants in Finland

Eero Jäppinen

Corresponding Author

Eero Jäppinen

Lappeenranta University of Technology, Bioenergy Technology Research Laboratory, Sammonkatu 12, 50130 Mikkeli, Finland

Correspondence: Eero Jäppinen, tel. +358 50 584 4634,e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Olli-Jussi Korpinen

Olli-Jussi Korpinen

Lappeenranta University of Technology, Bioenergy Technology Research Laboratory, Sammonkatu 12, 50130 Mikkeli, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Tapio Ranta

Tapio Ranta

Lappeenranta University of Technology, Bioenergy Technology Research Laboratory, Sammonkatu 12, 50130 Mikkeli, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 February 2013
Citations: 20

Abstract

Commercial-scale liquid-biofuel production utilizing forest-based biomass would require feedstock supply from a large geographical area. Feedstock composition, supply chains' arrangements, and the resulting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are location dependent, and case-specific assessments are needed if one is to guarantee the fulfillment of GHG reduction requirements by a specific biofuel product. This work assessed GHG emissions derived from the feedstock supply and transportation chain to three possible commercial-scale biodiesel plant locations in Finland (Rauma, Porvoo, and Kemi) at site-specific level. The supply of 7.2 PJ yr−1 (approximately 1 million m3solid) of forest biomass (harvesting residues, stumps, and small-diameter energy wood) was assessed for each location, including four distinct scenarios for truck and railway transportation and two scenarios for biomass availability. Biomass availability and transportation-network assessments were conducted through utilization of geographical information system methods, and the GHG emissions were assessed by means of life-cycle assessment. The results showed that the GHG emissions of the supply chains can be effectively reduced through use of railway transportation from distant supply areas. Furthermore, even though the supply-chain GHG emissions differed by up to 30% between the case-study locations, the GHG emissions of the feedstock supply chain, from roadside stores of uncomminuted biomass to comminuted biomass delivered to the plants, were relatively low (2–4%) when compared with the GHG emissions of fossil diesel.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.