Statistical analysis based reactive power optimization using improved differential evolutionary algorithm
Lalit Kumar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Manoj Kumar Kar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Correspondence
Manoj Kumar Kar, Department of Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India,
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSanjay Kumar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Search for more papers by this authorLalit Kumar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Manoj Kumar Kar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Correspondence
Manoj Kumar Kar, Department of Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India,
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSanjay Kumar
Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study presents a novel improved differential evolutionary (IDE) algorithm for optimizing reactive power management (RPM) problems. The effectiveness of IDE algorithm is tested on different unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions. The objective function of the RPM is considered as the minimization of active power losses. Initially, the power flow analysis approach is employed to detect the optimal position of flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices. The proposed method is used to determine the optimal value of control variables such as generator's reactive power generation, transformer tap settings, and reactive power sources. Furthermore, the efficacy of the IDE approach is compared with other promising optimization methods such as variants of differential evolution algorithm, moth flame optimization (MFO), brainstorm-based optimization algorithm (BSOA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) on various IEEE standard test bus (i.e., IEEE-30, -57, -118, and -300) systems with active and reactive loading incorporating FACTS devices. A Static VAR compensator (SVC) for shunt compensation and a thyristor-controlled series compensator (TCSC) for series compensation were used as FACTS devices. The proposed IDE method significantly reduces the active power loss, that is, 55.65% in IEEE 30, 39.68% in IEEE 57, 16.32% in IEEE 118, and 8.56% in IEEE 300 bus system at nominal loading. Finally, the statistical analysis such as Wilcoxon signed-rank test (WSRT) and ANOVA test were thoroughly analysed to demonstrate the firmness and accuracy of the proposed technique.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Abou El Elaa, A. A., Abido, M. A., & Spea, S. R. (2011). Differential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 81(2), 458–464.
- Adebayo, I., Jimoh, A., & Yusuff, A. (2018). Techniques for the identification of critical nodes leading to voltage collapse in a power system. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, 19(2), 20170129.
- Attia, A., Sehiemy, R. A., & Hasanien, H. (2018). Optimal power flow solution in power systems using a novel sine-cosine algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 99(7), 331–343.
- Awad, N. H., Ali, M. Z., Mallipeddi, R., & Suganthan, P. N. (2019). An efficient differential evolution algorithm for stochastic OPF based active-reactive power dispatch problem considering renewable generators. Applied Soft Computing, 76(3), 445–458.
- Babu, R., Kumar, V., Shiva, C. K., Raj, S., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2022). Application of sine–cosine optimization algorithm for minimization of transmission loss. Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, 7(1), 1–12.
- Babu, R., Raj, S., Dey, B., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2022). Optimal reactive power planning using oppositional grey wolf optimization by considering bus vulnerability analysis. Energy Conversion and Economics, 3(1), 38–49.
10.1049/enc2.12048 Google Scholar
- Bhattacharyya, B., & Babu, R. (2016). Teaching learning-based optimization algorithm for reactive power planning. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 81(8), 248–253.
- Bhattacharyya, B., & Gupta, V. (2014). Fuzzy based evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization with FACTS devices. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 61(8), 39–47.
- Bhattacharyya, B., & Kumar, S. (2016). Approach for the solution of transmission congestion with multi-type FACTS devices. IET Generation Transmission and Distribution, 10(11), 2802–2809.
- Chen, G., Liu, L., Guo, Y., & Huang, S. (2016). Multi-objective enhanced PSO algorithm for optimizing power losses and voltage deviation in power systems. COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 35(1), 350–372.
- Dash, S. P., Subhashini, K., & Satapathy, J. K. (2020). Efficient utilization of power system network through optimal location of FACTS devices using a proposed hybrid meta-heuristic ant lion-moth flame-Salp swarm optimization algorithm. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 30, 4.
- Duan, C., Fang, W., Jiang, L., & Niu, S. (2015). FACTS devices allocation via sparse optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(2), 1308–1319.
- Duman, S., Guvenc, U., Sonmez, Y., & Yorukeren, N. (2012). Optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 59(7), 86–95.
- Effatnejad, R., Aliyari, H., & Savaghebi, M. (2017). Solving multi-objective optimal power flow using modified GA and PSO based on hybrid algorithm. Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering, 5(1), 51–60.
- Eghbal, M., Yorino, N., El-Araby, E. E., & Zoka, Y. (2008). Multi-load level reactive power planning considering slow and fast VAR devices by means of particle swarm optimization. IET Generation Transmission and Distribution, 2(5), 743–751.
- Ettappan, M., Vimala, V., Ramesh, S., & Kesavan, V. T. (2020). Optimal reactive power dispatch for real power loss minimization and voltage stability enhancement using artificial bee Colony algorithm. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 76(5), 103085.
- Gao, D., Wang, G. G., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). Solving fuzzy job-shop scheduling problem using DE algorithm improved by a selection mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28(12), 3265–3275.
- Gerbex, S., Cherkaoui, R., & Germond, A. J. (2001). Optimal location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(3), 537–544.
- Habur, K.: 2002 FACTS for cost effective and reliable transmission of electrical energy. www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/em/transmission/facts_siemens.pdf
- Hingorani, N. G., Gyugyi, L., & El-Hawary, M. (2000). “Understanding FACTS: Concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems”, 1. IEEE Press.
- Jordehi, A. R. (2015). Brainstorm optimization algorithm (BSOA): An efficient algorithm for finding optimal location and setting of FACTS devices in electric power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 69(7), 48–57.
- Kar, M.K., Kumar, L., Kumar, S., & Singh, A.K. Efficient Operation of Power System with FACTS controllers using Evolutionary Techniques, 2020 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), 2020, pp. 962–965, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN48934.2020.9070909.
10.1109/SPIN48934.2020.9070909 Google Scholar
- Kar, M. K., Kumar, S., Singh, A. K., & Panigrahi, S. (2021a). Reactive power management by using a modified differential evolution algorithm. Optimal Control Applications & Methods, 1–20.
- Kar, M. K., Kumar, S., Singh, A. K., & Panigrahi, S. (2021b). A modified sine cosine algorithm with ensemble search agent updating schemes for small signal stability analysis. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 31, e13058. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.13058
- Karmakar, N., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2020). Optimal reactive power planning in power transmission system considering FACTS devices and implementing hybrid optimisation approach. IET Generation Transmission and Distribution, 14(25), 6294–6305.
- Khan, N. H., Wang, Y., Tian, D., Jamal, R., Iqbal, S., Saif, M. A. A., & Ebeed, M. (2021). A novel modified lightning attachment procedure optimization technique for optimal allocation of the FACTS devices in power systems. IEEE Access, 9, 47976–47997.
- Kumar, L, Kar, M.K., & Kumar, S. Reactive Power Management by Optimal Positioning of FACTS Controllers using MFO Algorithm, 2021 Emerging Trends in Industry 4.0 (ETI 4.0), 2021, pp. 1–6, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETI4.051663.2021.9619433.
10.1109/ETI4.051663.2021.9619433 Google Scholar
- Kumari, S., Kar, M. K., Kumar, L., & Kumar, S. (2022). Optimal siting of facts controller using moth flame optimization technique. Control Applications in Modern Power Systems, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0193-5_7
10.1007/978-981-19-0193-5_7 Google Scholar
- Mahapatra, S., Dey, B., & Raj, S. (2021). A novel ameliorated Harris hawk optimizer for solving complex engineering optimization problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36, 7641–7681.
- Mahdad, B. (2019). Optimal reconfiguration and reactive power planning-based fractal search algorithm: A case study of the Algerian distribution electrical system. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal., 22(1), 78–101.
- Mei, R. N., Sulaiman, M., Mustaffa, Z., & Daniyal, H. (2017). Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique. Applied Soft Computing, 59(10), 210–222.
- Mouassa, S., Bouktir, T., & Salhi, A. (2017). Ant lion optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem in power systems. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20(3), 885–895.
- Naderi, E., Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., & Abdi, H. (2019). An efficient particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve optimal power flow problem integrated with FACTS devices. Applied Soft Computing, 80(7), 243–262.
- Phadke, A. R., Fozdar, M., & Niazi, K. R. (2012). A new multi-objective fuzzy-GA formulation for optimal placement and sizing of shunt FACTS controller. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 40(1), 46–53.
- Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., & Mantovani, J. R. S. (2018). Logically constrained optimal power flow: Solver-based mixed-integer nonlinear programming model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 97(4), 240–249.
- Premkumar, M., Jangir, P., Sowmya, R., & Elavarasan, R. M. (2021). Many-objective gradient-based optimizer to solve optimal power flow problems: Analysis and validations. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 106(11), 104479.
- Pulluri, H., Naresh, R., & Sharma, V. (2017). An enhanced self-adaptive differential evolution-based solution methodology for multi-objective optimal power flow. Applied Soft Computing, 54(5), 229–245.
- Raj, S., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2018a). Optimal placement of TCSC and SVC for reactive power planning using whale optimization algorithm. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 40(3), 131–143.
- Raj, S., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2018b). Reactive power planning by opposition-based grey wolf optimization method. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 28(6), e2551.
- Ramirez, J. M., Gonzalez, J. M., & Ruben, T. O. (2011). An investigation about the impact of the optimal reactive power dispatch solved by DE. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 33(2), 236–244.
- Reddy, S. S. (2019). Optimal power flow using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10(5), 1077–1091.
- Sakr, W. S., EL-Sehiemy, R. A., & Azmy, A. M. (2017). Adaptive differential evolution algorithm for efficient reactive power management. Applied Soft Computing, 53(4), 336–351.
- Sanam, J., Ganguly, S., Panda, A. K., & Hemanth, C. (2017). Optimization of energy loss cost of distribution networks with the optimal placement and sizing of DSTATCOM using differential evolution algorithm. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(7), 2851–2865.
- Shekarappa, G., Swetha, S. M., & Raj, S. (2021). Voltage constrained reactive power planning problem for reactive loading variation using hybrid Harris hawk particle swarm optimizer. Electric Power Components & Systems, 49(4–5), 421–435.
- Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution: A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous space. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359.
- Taher, M. A., Kamel, S., Jurado, F., & Ebeed, M. (2020). Optimal power flow solution incorporating a simplified UPFC model using lightning attachment procedure optimization. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 30(1), e12170.
- Yang, N., Yu., C. W., Wen, F., & Chung, C. Y. (2007). An investigation of reactive power planning based on chance constrained programming. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29(9), 650–656.
- Zou, D., Wu, J., Gao, L., & Li, S. (2013). A modified differential evolution algorithm for unconstrained optimization problems. Neurocomputing, 120, 469–481.