The global system-ranking efficiency model and calculating examples with consideration of the nonhomogeneity of decision-making units
Corresponding Author
Shuhong Wang
School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Correspondence
Shuhong Wang, School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXiaoli Sun
School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shuhong Wang
School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Correspondence
Shuhong Wang, School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXiaoli Sun
School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100 China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Data envelopment analyses have been widely used to evaluate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). However, the traditional data envelopment analysis model has not considered the problem of DMUs' nonhomogeneity. If nonhomogeneous DMUs are evaluated under the same production frontier, conclusions may not be precise. For example, some DMUs' input redundancy and output deficit cannot be adjusted as per planning results, which may lead to mistakes in management. This paper loosens the assumption of DMU homogeneity and builds a global system-ranking efficiency model based on existing literature, which divides the problem of DMUs' nonhomogeneity into external nonhomogeneity and internal homogeneity. Data have been collected from 114 listed enterprises in China's solar power industry, and the analysis results indicate that this paper's model is stable and reliable and can be used as a reference for production managers.
REFERENCES
- Agrell, P. J., & Brea-Solis, H. (2017). Capturing heterogeneity in electricity distribution operations: A critical review of latent class modeling. Energy Policy, 104, 361–372.
- Atici, K. B., & Podinovski, V. V. (2015). Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical efficiency of units with different specialisations: An application to agriculture. Omega, 54, 72–83.
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 99: 1078–1092.
- Bogetoft, P., & Hougaard, J. L. (2004). Super efficiency evaluations based on potential slack. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(1), 14–21.
- Brown, R. (2006). Mismanagement or mismeasurement? Pitfalls and protocols for DEA studies in the financial services sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 1100–1116.
- Bruni, M. E., Guerriero, F., & Patitucci, V. (2010). Benchmarking sustainable development via data envelopment analysis: An Italian case study. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(1), 47–56.
- Camanho, A., Portela, M., & Vaz, C. B. (2009). Efficiency analysis accounting for internal and external non-discretionary factors. Computers & Operations Research, 36(5), 1591–1601.
- Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2001). DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 274–286.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
- Chen, Y. C., Lee, P. R., & Chiu, Y. H. (2017). The efficiency of non-homogeneity security firms in Taiwan. PANOECONOMICUS, 64(3), 353–370.
- Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous decision making units. Operations Research, 61(3), 666–676.
- Cook, W. D., Imanirad, R., & Zhu, J. (2013). Partial input to output impacts in DEA: Production considerations and resource sharing among business sub-units. Naval Research Logistics, 60(3), 190–207.
- Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., & Camanho, A. S. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259.
- Haas, D. A., & Murphy, F. H. (2003). Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3), 530–544.
- Honma, S., & Hu, J. L. (2008). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy, 36(2), 821–833.
- Hu, J. L., & Kao, C. H. (2007). Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies. Energy Policy, 35(1), 373–382.
- Izadikhah, M., & Saen, R. F. (2015). A new data envelopment analysis method for ranking decision making units: An application in industrial parks. Expert Systems, 32(5), 596–608.
- Jahanshahloo, G. R., Junior, H. V., Lotfi, F. H., & Akbarian, D. (2007). A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 331–337.
- Li, W. H., Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2016). DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations. European Journal of Operational Research, 254, 946–956.
- Lovell, C. A. K., & Rouse, A. P. B. (2003). Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(1), 101–108.
- Mohammad, T., Farzipoor, S. R., & Reza, F. G. (2015). Developing network data envelopment analysis model for supply chain performance measurement in the presence of zero data. Expert Systems, 32(3), 381–391.
- Pan, H., Zhang, H., & Zhang, X. (2013). China's provincial industrial energy efficiency and its determinants. Mathematical and Computer Modelling., 58(5), 1032–1039.
10.1016/j.mcm.2012.09.006 Google Scholar
- Saen, R. F. (2007). A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: Accounting for non-homogeneity is important. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 185(1), 84–95.
- Saen, R. F., Memariani, A., & Lotfi, F. H. (2005). Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: A case study in IROST. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 165(2), 313–328.
- Sexton, T. R., Sleeper, S., & Taggart, R. E. (1994). Improving pupil transportation in North Carolina. Interfaces, 24(1), 87–103.
- Shi, G. M., Bi, J., & Wang, J. N. (2010). Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6172–6179.
- Song, M., Zhang, L., An, Q., et al. (2013). Statistical analysis and combination forecasting of environmental efficiency and its influential factors since China entered the WTO: 2002- 2010-2012. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 42–51.
- Tone, K. (1993). Data envelopment analysis. Tokyo: JUSE Press, Ltd.
- Visbal-Cadavid, D., Matinez-Gomez, M., & Guijarro, F. (2017). Assessing the efficiency of public universities through DEA: A case study. Sustainability, 9(8), 1–20.
- Wang, K., & Wei, Y. M. (2014). China's regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Applied Energy, 130, 617–631.
- Wang, Z. H., Zeng, H. L., Wei, Y. M., & Zhang, Y. X. (2012). Regional total factor energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of industrial sector in China. Applied Energy, 97, 115–123.
- Wu, F., Fan, L. W., Zhou, P., & Zhou, D. Q. (2012). Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: A nonparametric analysis. Energy Policy, 49, 164–172.
- Xiao, M. D., & Li, C. D. (2007). Study of DEA and its application with non-homogeneity decision making units. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29(1), 57–59.
- Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., Yuan, J. H., & Gao, X. J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39(2), 644–650.