Volume 29, Issue 10 pp. 945-952
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

In vivo confocal microscopy: The role of comparative approach in patients with multiple atypical nevi

Sabrina Longhitano

Sabrina Longhitano

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Riccardo Pampena

Corresponding Author

Riccardo Pampena

Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Correspondence

Riccardo Pampena, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale – IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica-Dermatologia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Stefania Guida

Stefania Guida

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara De Pace

Barbara De Pace

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Silvana Ciardo

Silvana Ciardo

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Johanna Chester

Johanna Chester

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Caterina Longo

Caterina Longo

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Centro Oncologico ad Alta Tecnologia Diagnostica, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francesca Farnetani

Francesca Farnetani

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Pellacani

Giovanni Pellacani

Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 August 2020
Citations: 6

IRB approval: protocol number NET-2011-02347213

Funding information

This research was kindly supported by Italian Ministry of Health (Project Code: NET-2011-02347213).

Abstract

Background

In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) increases diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis when combined with dermoscopy. In patients with multiple atypical nevi, a comparative dermoscopic approach improves melanoma recognition and saves unnecessary excision. The performance of a comparative approach combining dermoscopy and RCM has not been yet investigated.

Objective

To validate a comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach according to melanoma diagnostic accuracy in patients with multiple atypical nevi.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing RCM examination for ≥3 atypical melanocytic lesions, assessed with a dermoscopic + RCM comparative approach in a real-life setting, from July 2012 to April 2018 at a single centre, were enrolled. Dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM morphologic approaches were retrospectively applied by evaluating revisited 7-point checklist, RCM and Delphi scores for each enrolled lesion. Comparative dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM approaches were subsequently used. For each approach, lesions were classified as non-suspicious (long-term follow-up) or suspicious (short-term follow-up or excision) and diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis was assessed.

Results

Diagnostic accuracy progressively increased comparing morphologic to comparative approaches, and comparing dermoscopic to dermoscopic + RCM approaches. The retrospective comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach revealed the largest area under the curve (0.84; 95%CI:0.79-0.89; P < .001) and the lowest number needed to excise (5.7). Furthermore, this approach had the highest specificity (67.6%) and sensitivity (100%) levels, which were similar to those verified in the real-life setting. The main study limitations are the retrospective design and high-risk patient inclusion only.

Conclusions

Comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach increases melanoma diagnostic accuracy, reducing unnecessary excision without missing melanomas.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.