Volume 60, Issue 3 pp. 571-580
FULL-LENGTH ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Risk analysis of hemorrhage in stereo-electroencephalography procedures

Robert A. McGovern

Robert A. McGovern

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Ruggieri

Paul Ruggieri

Department of Neuroradiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Juan Bulacio

Juan Bulacio

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Imad Najm

Imad Najm

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
William E. Bingaman

William E. Bingaman

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Jorge A. Gonzalez-Martinez

Corresponding Author

Jorge A. Gonzalez-Martinez

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

Correspondence

Jorge A. Gonzalez-Martinez, Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2019
Citations: 81

Summary

Objective

To examine the true incidence of hemorrhage related to stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) procedures. To analyze risk factors associated with the presence of different types of hemorrhage in SEEG procedures.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center observational study examining every SEEG implantation performed at our center from 2009 to 2017. This consisted of 549 consecutive SEEG implantations using a variety of stereotactic and imaging techniques. A hemorrhage grading system was applied by a blinded neuroradiologist to every postimplant and postexplant computed tomography (CT) scan. Hemorrhages were classified as asymptomatic or symptomatic based on neurologic deficit seen on examination. Statistical analysis included multivariate regression using relevant preoperative variables to predict the presence of hemorrhage.

Results

One hundred five implantations (19.1%) had any type of hemorrhage seen on postimplant CT. Of these, 93 (16.9%) were asymptomatic and 12 (2.2%) were symptomatic, with 3 implantations (0.6%) resulting in either a permanent deficit (2, 0.4%) or death (1, 0.2%). Male sex, increased number of electrodes, and increasing age were associated with increased risk of postimplant hemorrhage on multivariate analysis. Increasing score in the grading system was related to a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of a symptomatic hemorrhage.

Significance

Detailed examination of every postimplant CT reveals that the total hemorrhage rate appears higher than previously reported. Most of these hemorrhages are small and asymptomatic. Our grading system may be useful to risk stratify these hemorrhages and awaits prospective validation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me