Volume 58, Issue S4 pp. 53-67
Harmonization in Preclinical Epilepsy Research

Standards for data acquisition and software-based analysis of in vivo electroencephalography recordings from animals. A TASK1-WG5 report of the AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE

Jason T. Moyer

Corresponding Author

Jason T. Moyer

Department of Neurology, Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Address correspondence to Jason T. Moyer, University of Pennsylvania, 3320 Smith Walk, 301 Hayden Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]

and

Aristea Galanopoulou, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Parkway South, Kennedy Center Rm 306, Bronx, NY 10461, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Vadym Gnatkovsky

Vadym Gnatkovsky

IRCCS Foundation, Epileptology and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Tomonori Ono

Tomonori Ono

Department of Neurosurgery, National Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Jakub Otáhal

Jakub Otáhal

Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Joost Wagenaar

Joost Wagenaar

Department of Neurology, Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
William C. Stacey

William C. Stacey

Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Noebels

Jeffrey Noebels

Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Akio Ikeda

Akio Ikeda

Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Staley

Kevin Staley

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Marco de Curtis

Marco de Curtis

IRCCS Foundation, Epileptology and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Litt

Brian Litt

Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Bioengineering, Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Aristea S. Galanopoulou

Corresponding Author

Aristea S. Galanopoulou

Laboratory of Developmental Epilepsy, Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A

Address correspondence to Jason T. Moyer, University of Pennsylvania, 3320 Smith Walk, 301 Hayden Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]

and

Aristea Galanopoulou, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Parkway South, Kennedy Center Rm 306, Bronx, NY 10461, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 November 2017
Citations: 27

Summary

Electroencephalography (EEG)—the direct recording of the electrical activity of populations of neurons—is a tremendously important tool for diagnosing, treating, and researching epilepsy. Although standard procedures for recording and analyzing human EEG exist and are broadly accepted, there are no such standards for research in animal models of seizures and epilepsy—recording montages, acquisition systems, and processing algorithms may differ substantially among investigators and laboratories. The lack of standard procedures for acquiring and analyzing EEG from animal models of epilepsy hinders the interpretation of experimental results and reduces the ability of the scientific community to efficiently translate new experimental findings into clinical practice. Accordingly, the intention of this report is twofold: (1) to review current techniques for the collection and software-based analysis of neural field recordings in animal models of epilepsy, and (2) to offer pertinent standards and reporting guidelines for this research. Specifically, we review current techniques for signal acquisition, signal conditioning, signal processing, data storage, and data sharing, and include applicable recommendations to standardize collection and reporting. We close with a discussion of challenges and future opportunities, and include a supplemental report of currently available acquisition systems and analysis tools. This work represents a collaboration on behalf of the American Epilepsy Society/International League Against Epilepsy (AES/ILAE) Translational Task Force (TASK1-Workgroup 5), and is part of a larger effort to harmonize video-EEG interpretation and analysis methods across studies using in vivo and in vitro seizure and epilepsy models.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me