Non-invasive brain stimulation for dystonia: therapeutic implications
Corresponding Author
R. Erro
Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), Department of Medicine, Neuroscience Section, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Correspondence: R. Erro, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorM. Tinazzi
Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorF. Morgante
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorK. P. Bhatia
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
R. Erro
Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), Department of Medicine, Neuroscience Section, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Correspondence: R. Erro, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL, 33 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorM. Tinazzi
Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorF. Morgante
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorK. P. Bhatia
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Dystonia is characterized by excessive muscle contractions giving rise to abnormal posture and involuntary twisting movements. Although dystonia syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders, certain pathophysiological mechanisms have been consistently identified across different forms. These pathophysiological mechanisms have subsequently been exploited for the development of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques able to modulate neural activity in one or more nodes of the putative network that is altered in dystonia, and the therapeutic role of NIBS has hence been suggested. Here all studies that applied such techniques as a therapeutic intervention in any forms of dystonia, including the few works performed in children, are reviewed and emerging concepts and pitfalls of NIBS are discussed.
References
- 1Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 863–873.
- 2Morgante F, Klein C. Dystonia. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19: 1225–1241.
- 3Thompson V, Jinnah HA, Hess E. Convergent mechanisms in etiologically-diverse dystonias. Expert Opin Ther Targers 2011; 15: 1387–1403.
- 4Quartarone A, Hallett M. Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 958–967.
- 5Niethammer M, Carbon M, Argyelan M, Eidelberg D. Hereditary dystonia as a neurodevelopmental circuit disorder: evidence from neuroimaging. Neurobiol Dis 2011; 42: 202–209.
- 6Picillo M, Lozano AM, Kou N, Munhoz RP, Fasano A. Programming deep brain stimulation for tremor and dystonia: the Toronto Western Hospital algorithms. Brain Stimul 2016; 9: 438–452.
- 7Wagle Shukla A, Vaillancourt DE. Treatment and physiology in Parkinson's disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2014; 14: 449.
- 8Cho HJ, Hallett M. Non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of focal hand dystonia: update and future direction. J Mov Disord 2016; 9: 55–62.
- 9Quartarone A, Rizzo V, Terranova C, et al. Sensory abnormalities in focal hand dystonia and non-invasive brain stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 956.
- 10Fox MD, Alterman RL. Brain stimulation for torsion dystonia. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72: 713–719.
- 11Tyvaert L, Houdayer E, Devanne H, Monaca C, Cassim F, Derambure P. The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dystonia: a clinical and pathophysiological approach. Neurophysiol Clin 2006; 36: 135–143.
- 12Wu AD, Fregni F, Simon DK, Deblieck C, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease and dystonia. Neurotherapeutics 2008; 5: 345–361.
- 13Davis NJ, van Koningsbruggen MG. ‘Non-invasive’ brain stimulation is not non-invasive. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 76.
- 14Tinazzi M, Zarattini S, Valeriani M, et al. Long-lasting modulation of human motor cortex following prolonged transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of forearm muscles: evidence of reciprocal inhibition and facilitation. Exp Brain Res 2005; 161: 457–464.
- 15Brasil-Neto JP, Cohen LG, Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth BJ, Hallett M. Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 9: 132–136.
- 16Malenka R, Bear M. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 2004; 44: 5–21.
- 17Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005; 45: 201–206.
- 18Peinemann A, Reimer B, Loer C, et al. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1519–1526.
- 19Touge T, Gerschlager W, Brown P, Rothwell JC. Are the aftereffects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 2138–2145.
- 20Fitzgerald PB, Brown TL, Daskalakis ZJ, Chen R, Kulkarni J. Intensity-dependent effects of 1 Hz rTMS on human corticospinal excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 1136–1141.
- 21Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A. Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 2000; 133: 425–430.
- 22Kleim JA, Chan S, Pringle E, et al. BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 735–737.
- 23Miranda PC. Physics of effects of transcranial brain stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 116: 353–366.
- 24Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 317.
- 25Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, et al. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 1031–1048.
- 26Chaieb L, Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011; 29: 167–175.
- 27Moliadze V, Atalay D, Antal A, Paulus W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul 2012; 5: 505–511.
- 28Neuling T, Rach S, Wagner S, Wolters CH, Herrmann CS. Good vibrations: oscillatory phase shapes perception. NeuroImage 2012; 63: 771–778.
- 29Antal A, Boros K, Poreisz C, Chaieb L, Terney D, Paulus W. Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimul 2008; 1: 97–105.
- 30Zaghi S, de Freitas Rezende L, de Oliveira LM, et al. Inhibition of motor cortex excitability with 15 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Neurosci Lett 2010; 479: 211–214.
- 31Feurra M, Paulus W, Walsh V, Kanai R. Frequency specific modulation of human somatosensory cortex. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 13.
- 32Calford MB, Tweedale R. Immediate and chronic changes in response of somatorysensor cortex in adult flying-fox after digit amputation. Nature 1998; 332: 446–448.
- 33Recanzone GH, Allard TT, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Receptive-field changes induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in SI of adult cats. J Neurophysiol 1990; 63: 1213–1225.
- 34Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 785–807.
- 35Young SJ, Bertucco M, Sheehan-Stross R, Sanger TD. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in children with dystonia: a pilot open-label trial. J Child Neurol 2013; 28: 1238–1244.
- 36Young SJ, Bertucco M, Sanger TD. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in children with dystonia: a sham-controlled study. J Child Neurol 2014; 29: 232–239.
- 37Bhanpuri NH, Bertucco M, Young SJ, Lee AA, Sanger TD. Multiday transcranial direct current stimulation causes clinically insignificant changes in childhood dystonia: a pilot study. J Child Neurol 2015; 30: 1604–1615.
- 38Palm U, Segmiller FM, Epple AN, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2016; 123: 1219–1234.
- 39Siebner HR, Tormos JM, Ceballos-Baumann AO, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer's cramp. Neurology 1999; 52: 529–537.
- 40Siebner HR, Filipovic SR, Rowe JB, et al. Patients with focal arm dystonia have increased sensitivity to slow-frequency repetitive TMS of the dorsal premotor cortex. Brain 2003; 126: 2710–2725.
- 41Murase N, Rothwell JC, Kaji R, et al. Subthreshold low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the premotor cortex modulates writer's cramp. Brain 2005; 128(Pt 1): 104–115.
- 42Borich M, Arora S, Kimberley TJ. Lasting effects of repeated rTMS application in focal hand dystonia. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27: 55–65.
- 43Havrankova P, Jech R, Walker ND, et al. Repetitive TMS of the somatosensory cortex improves writer's cramp and enhances cortical activity. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2010; 31: 73–86.
- 44Huang YZ, Lu CS, Rothwell JC, et al. Modulation of the disturbed motor network in dystonia by multisession suppression of premotor cortex. PLoS One 2012; 7: e47574.
- 45Kimberley TJ, Borich MR, Arora S, Siebner HR. Multiple sessions of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in focal hand dystonia: clinical and physiological effects. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31: 533–542.
- 46Kimberley TJ, Schmidt RL, Chen M, Dykstra DD, Buetefisch CM. Mixed effectiveness of rTMS and retraining in the treatment of focal hand dystonia. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 385.
- 47Buttkus F, Weidenmüller M, Schneider S, et al. Failure of cathodal direct current stimulation to improve fine motor control in musician's dystonia. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 389–394.
- 48Buttkus F, Baur V, Jabusch HC, et al. Single-session tDCS-supported retraining does not improve fine motor control in musician's dystonia. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011; 29: 85–90.
- 49Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, Pal N, Luckenbaugh DA, Hallett M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of focal hand dystonia. Mov Disord 2011; 26: 1698–1702.
- 50Furuya S, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Altenmüller E. Surmounting retraining limits in musicians’ dystonia by transcranial stimulation. Ann Neurol 2014; 75: 700–707.
- 51Sadnicka A, Hamada M, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC, Edwards MJ. Cerebellar stimulation fails to modulate motor cortex plasticity in writing dystonia. Mov Disord 2014; 29: 1304–1307.
- 52Rosset-Llobet J, Fàbregas-Molas S, Pascual-Leone Á. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on neurorehabilitation of task-specific dystonia: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Med Probl Perform Art 2015; 30: 178–184.
- 53Bradnam LV, Graetz LJ, McDonnell MN, Ridding MC. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum improves handwriting and cyclic drawing kinematics in focal hand dystonia. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 286.
- 54Tinazzi M, Farina S, Bhatia K, et al. TENS for the treatment of writer's cramp dystonia: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 2005; 64: 1946–1948.
- 55Tinazzi M, Zarattini S, Valeriani M, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on motor cortex excitability in writer's cramp: neurophysiological and clinical correlations. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 1908–1913.
- 56Koch G, Porcacchia P, Ponzo V, et al. Effects of two weeks of cerebellar theta burst stimulation in cervical dystonia patients. Brain Stimul 2014; 7: 564–572.
- 57Pirio Richardson S, Tinaz S, Chen R. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cervical dystonia: effect of site and repetition in a randomized pilot trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0124937.
- 58Zittel S, Helmich RC, Demiralay C, Münchau A, Bäumer T. Normalization of sensorimotor integration by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cervical dystonia. J Neurol 2015; 262: 1883–1889.
- 59Kranz G, Shamim EA, Lin PT, Kranz GS, Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation modulates blepharospasm: a randomized controlled study. Neurology 2010; 75: 1465–1471.
- 60Angelakis E, Liouta E, Andreadis N, et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation reduces symptoms in intractable idiopathic cervical dystonia: a case study. Neurosci Lett 2013; 533: 39–43.
- 61Bradnam LV, Frasca J, Kimberley TJ. Direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex and cerebellum and botulinum toxin A injections in a person with cervical dystonia. Brain Stimul 2014; 7: 909–911.
- 62Monte-Silva K, Kuo MF, Liebetanz D, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). J Neurophysiol 2010; 103: 1735–1740.
- 63Hosono Y, Urushihara R, Harada M, et al. Comparison of monophasic versus biphasic stimulation in rTMS over premotor cortex: SEP and SPECT studies. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2538–2545.
- 64Antonini A, Morgante F. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of dystonia. In: M Stacy, ed. Handbook of dystonia. London: Informa Healthcare, 2012: 501–511.
10.3109/9781841848525.033 Google Scholar
- 65Tyvaert L, Cassim C, Devanne H, et al. Subthreshold low frequency rTMS over the premotor cortex and sensorimotor integration in patients with writer's cramp. Neurology 2006; 66: A179.
- 66Bäumer T, Demiralay C, Hidding U, et al. Abnormal plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex to slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with writer's cramp. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 81–90.
- 67Comella CL, Fox SH, Bhatia KP, et al. Development of the comprehensive cervical dystonia rating scale: methodology. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2015; 2: 135–141.
- 68Nitsche MA, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Paulus W, Ziemann U. The pharmacology of neuroplasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation: building models for the clinical use of CNS active drugs. J Physiol 2012; 590: 4641–4662.
- 69Erro R, Rocchi L, Antelmi E, et al. High frequency repetitive sensory stimulation improves temporal discrimination in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 817–820.
- 70Rocchi L, Erro R, Antelmi E, et al. High frequency somatosensory stimulation increases sensorimotor inhibition and leads to perceptual improvement in healthy subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 1015–1025.